Due Process Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What are the types of Due Process?

A

Procedural - what the government has to do before they can do it, what process you deserve.

Substantive - whether the government can actually do what they are doing (the Reason)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What factors must be weighed when looking at Due Process?

A

• The individual’s interest (often in liberty)
• The government’s interest and burden on affording more process
○ enemy combatants do not return to the battlefield
○ Burden - e.g. transportation or on the military mission
• Risk of error and probable value of additional safeguards.
○ What is the chance that the current process can err over the reason for detention?
- In this instance, no chance for Hamdi to rebut his detention, or to review the evidence (or lack thereof).
○ What is the chance that if you give the person more process, you will get to the right result?
- More process would allow a neutral judge to examine the evidence that was just taken as fact by the military commission.
(Matthews v. Eldridge)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Hamdi v. Rumsfeld

A

A combatant being detained as an enemy combatant must receive notice of the factual basis for his classification and a fair opportunity to rebut the governments factual assertions before a neutral decision maker.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Are non citizens entitled to process?

A

Right to habeas extends to enemy combatants held at Guantanamo Bay.

Congress cannot block access to courts unless it validly suspends writ or creates an adequate substitute procedure.
Military Commission Ace does not provide adequate procedure. (Boumediene v. Bush)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the Privileges and Immunities clause?

A

no state shall make any law which shall abridge the privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States.

Cases under the 14th amendment found that the right to work was protected under P&I Clause.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What did the Court find the Privileges and Immunities clause protected under the 14th Amendment with regards to the States?

A

○ Making claims on government seats
○ Transacting business with government
○ Seeking government protection
○ Free access to seaports, subtreasuries, land offices, and courts.
• Severely restricted the privileges and immunity clause of the 14th Amendment (essentially made this clause dormant). Followed for 126 years.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Saenz v. Roe

A

Right to Travel between the States.

Law restricting welfare payments impeded on the right to travel.
• Distinguished welfare payments by saying they were not “portable” - would be spent in the state and cannot take those benefits with you to another state.
• Education and divorce could be used in any state and thus are portable, and allowed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the difference between Procedural and Substantive Due Process?

A

• Procedural - was the procedure in compliance with applicable laws?
• Substantive - The reason the government is taking your life, liberty, or property, and is that reason sufficient.
○ If a fundamental right - Necessary to achieve a compelling standard (strict scrutiny)
- Economic rights are not fundamental

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How can the state use its police power to regulate?

A

the act must have a direct relation to the safety, health, and general welfare:
• A means to an end
• The end itself must be appropriate and legitimate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Lochner v. New York

A

Law put restrictions on working hours for bakers.

Court says that bakers are equal in intelligence and capacity to men in other trades.
• State cannot take away their rights to contract as they want.
• Not wards of the state that need the protecting arm of the state to interfere with their judgment and actions.

This ruling made even though the state had legitimate reasons to regulate working hours.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was the concern about the Court’s ruling in Lochner?

A

Judicial overreach, Court had no true constitutional basis for their ruling.

Epitome of Judicial Activism. Court put forward its own view and maneuvered the Constitution to suit their needs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was the significance of West Point Hotel v. Parrish?

A

Minimum wage law for women allowed (overruled Adkins)
• Health of women and protection from unscrupulous employers is necessary for the public welfare.
• Public had to support the women making low wages through taxes, better if the company that was using their work had to pay instead of the public

Begins a turning point towards deference towards state law.
• Roosevelt had just announced his court packing plan, and Justice Roberts changed his vote, which had previously struck down several New Deal laws.
• End of the Lochner Era

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the rational review standard for Due Process?

A

A law that is rationally related to a legitimate government purpose does not violate due process

Rational review requires only a conceivable rational relationship between the means and the law’s purpose. (Williams v. Lee Optical Co.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What case set the stage for equal protection and the tiers of review?

A

U.S. v. Carolene Products.

minorities may need a higher level protection of the courts because they cannot pass laws not wanted by the majority (shut out of the political process)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the analysis for fundamental rights?

A

Use for all Due Process Questions
must conduct an analysis of each question (argue both sides):
1. Is it a fundamental right?
a. Not always clear. Can argue that something should be a fundamental right, even if the court has not ruled on it.
b. If yes, strict scrutiny. If no, rational review.
2. Is the right infringed?
3. Is there significant justification?
a. Must justify the act (Substantive)
b. Must provide adequate procedures (Procedural)
4. Are the means sufficiently related to the ends?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Griswold v. Connecticut

A

Law prohibited use of a contraceptive device.

Right of privacy, although not specifically enumerated in the Constitution, emanates from several Amendments, and is applicable to the states under the 14th Amendment. Law violates the most intimate expectation of privacy, that of the intimate relationship between husband and wife, and the physician’s role in that relationship.

Strict scrutiny

17
Q

Roe v. Wade

A

Texas law made it a crime to “procure an abortion.”

Court decides the right to privacy includes the decision about terminating pregnancy so the state cannot intrude until viability.
• State can place restrictions on abortions after the fetus is determined to be viable (possible to survive outside the womb with current medical technology).
○ Determined to be after the first trimester.
○ General restrictions can be put in place with the exception of preservation of the life and health of the mother.
• Balancing the state’s interest with the mother’s privacy.
State laws regulating abortion must pass strict scrutiny (now overruled).

18
Q

What is the current standard of Review for abortion regulations?

A

Undue burden test - where a due process fundamental right only applies to abortion at this time. (could argue to apply this standard to a new fundamental right)

A law that has the purpose or effect of placing a substantial obstacle in the path of a woman’s choice to have an abortion before viability violates due process.

(Planned Parenthood of SE PA v. Casey)

19
Q

Is Marriage a fundamental right?

A

Marriage is considered a fundamental right and will generally get strict scrutiny.

Dispute because fundamental rights, in a strict reading, are enumerated in the Constitution, and marriage is not.

20
Q

Loving v. Virginia

A

Court overruled Virginia restriction on interracial marriage. Violated both equal protection and due process.

21
Q

Zablocki v. Redhail

A

Court determined that a law requiring men who owed child support payments to get court approval before getting married. Equal protection (unfairly burdened men, especially poor men (although poor is not a protected class) and substantive due process (right to marry is of fundamental importance, other ways the state can enforce child support payments)

22
Q

Lawrence v. Texas

A

Right to privacy for consenting adults in the bedroom. Court does not say this is a fundamental right, it is an extension of other rights.
• No long-standing history of laws against gay conduct.

Sexuality is not a protected category - rational review.
Gender is a partially protected category - intermediate review.

Main Points to take away:
• How the court is observing history
• How the decision draws upon the ideas of due process but without going through the process.
- Not a very sound decision

23
Q

Windsor

A

defined marriage as between a man and a woman for federal law and recognition.
• Some state laws allowed same sex marriages.
• States have always had power over family issues and marriage.

Court says this law violated due process and equal protection.
	• Purpose was to harm a class of people that New York wants to protect.

Rational Review for same-sex couples.