Duck's Phase Model of Relationship Breakdown Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Name the 4 stages of Duck’s model.

A

Intra Psychic Phase
Dyadic Phase
Social Phase
Grave Dressing Phase

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why is it called the ‘intra psychic phase’?

A

The unhappy partner internalises their feelings and the other partner does not know how they feel.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How may a person in the intra psychic phase hint to their partner that they are unhappy without directly telling them?

A

They might become withdrawn and show a lack of interest in the relationship.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What might a partner consider about rewards and costs in the intra psychic stage?

A

They consider whether they are making a profit in terms of rewards. If profit is not being made, they may feel dissatisfied.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What does the unhappy partner do in the dyadic phase?

A

They confront their partner, review commitment and reassess goals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Why might the relationship be terminated at the dyadic phase?

A

Rewards and costs have not been renegotiated.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What do unhappy partners do in the social phase?

A

They alert people in their close social network about issues in the relationship.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Why might the relationship be terminated in the social phase?

A

Opinions of friends and family may influence the person’s decision whether to save or terminate the relationship.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What happens to the relationship in the grave dressing phase?

A

The relationship is mostly dead and cannot be saved, therefore it is terminated.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What might partners do when discussing the end of the relationship to other people?

A

They may give different versions of the story to others in order to gain their sympathy and not seem like the ‘bad’ person.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How do partners in the grave dressing phase prevent their initial decision to form the relationship from seeming illogical?

A

They present themselves in a positive light and reinterpret their partners characteristics and qualities in a negative way.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Why might partners imply they are happy that the relationship has ended even though they may not be?

A

To prevent themselves from looking foolish after originally choosing to form the relationship in the first place.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Explain the strength of the model suggesting ways that breakdown can be reversed.
What did Duck suggest that people in the intra psychic phase do instead of focusing on the negative aspects of their partner?
What should people do in the Dyadic phase when trying to save their relationships?
Overall, how is the model useful in relationship counselling?

A

The model is useful because it recognizes that different repair strategies are more effective at some points of breakdown than others. For example, Duck recommended that people in the intra-psychic stage could be encouraged to focus their worrying on the positive aspects of their partner instead. Also, a feature of the dyadic phase is communication, and any attempt to improve this and wider social skills could be beneficial in fostering greater stability in the relationship. These insights can be used in relationship counselling to help couples through difficult times

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Explain the limitation of cultural issues with Duck’s model.
The model is based of couples in which type of culture?
Moghaddam said that relationships in individualist cultures are v_________. How are relationships ended in this culture?
Why are relationships in collectivist cultures harder to end?
Therefore, the model does not apply to all…

A

The model is based on research into relationship breakdown in individualist cultures, especially in the US. According to Moghaddam, relationships in individualist cultures are generally voluntary and frequently come to an end, such as through divorce. But in collectivist cultures, relationships are less easy to end as whole families can become involved. The entire concept of romantic relationships differs completely between cultures. This means that the model’s application is not useful for all cultures.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Explain the limitation of methodological and ethical issues surrounding the model.
Research into Duck’s model is retrospective - what does this mean?
Why might research into relationships have social desirability bias?
This means that findings from research may not be r_________.
Why are researchers often reluctant to study breakdown?

A

Most of research relating to Duck’s model is retrospective. PPTs generally give their experiences of the breakdown process some time after the relationship has ended. PPTs may also give different stories of their breakdown to researchers to make themselves look better. Therefore, their recall may not always be accurate or reliable. Researchers are often reluctant to study breakdown as well because their involvement could make things worse and destroy a relationship that could have been resurrected. Therefore, researchers must be careful with how they study breakdown.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Explain the limitation of Duck’s model being simplistic.
Name the 5th phase that was later added onto the model. Explain what this phase is.
In contrast, what does Felmlee’s Fatal Attraction Hypothesis explain that Duck’s model does not?
Why would a 5th stage benefit Duck’s model?

A

A 5th phase, ‘resurrection’, was later added to the model, where experience from the recently ended relationship is applied when forming a new one. Also, the model is a description, not an explanation. In contrast, Felmlee’s Fatal Attraction Hypothesis does explain traits that lead to breakdown. The model does not account for the complexity of breakdown: a 5th stage and a combination of the how and the why offers a more complete explanation.