Drugs, Mental Health & Alcohol Flashcards
Describe 3 grounds for a warrantless search-section 20 SASA 2012?
Impractical to get a warrant, RGB Illegal drugs and offences against MODA, RGS offence, RGB EM will be CADD.
What does section 21 SASA 2012 give police the power to do?
Warrantless search of a person and MAY be searched who was in a place or vehicle.
What is section 22 SASA 2012 refer to?
If a constable has RGB that a person is in possession of a specified controlled drug of scheduled in the 1st, 2nd and third of the act.
What constitues an internal search?
Is an internal examination of a persons body using an x ray or similar device or the oral examination of a body orifice wheather with or without a device and must not insert any instrument
What is not an internal search?
Visual inspection of the mouth, ears, nose. A medical examiner may conduct an internal search under the direction of a constable.
What was found in R v Hoete?
Police had grounds to conduct a warrantless search and a search located a memory stick which led them to a P Lab and the defendant argued the the evidence was improperly obtained. The probative value of the evidence outweighed the improprierty of the improperly obtained evidence and the search was reasonable.
On what grounds was evidence admissable in R v Merret?
Exclusion of evidence would be disproportinate to breach of rights involved, appeal dismissed. This involved a search without warrant and M was charged with Manufacturing Meth.
What was found in Hill v Attorney General
First is Police must believe it is a drug, secondly the drugs must be on the schedule, this case relates to H having his taxt searched and the Sgt did not know what the drug was.
Collins v Police refers to what appeal?
Collins was searched by two constables on the grounds of observation and demenour, the court held that while this is strong suspicion, it does not amount to belief.
What was held in R v T?
The court ruled no internal search was conducted and ruled the search lawful. A demand to spiT the drugs out did not amount to an internal search pursuant to section 124 SASA 2012.
What was held in R v Roulston?
R removed drugs from his underwear and placed into his mouth, police held his nostril and head back and the drugs were ejected onto the floor. This did not amount to an internal search and staff were justified s41 CA 1961 to prevent 1X.
Sneller v Police was appealed successfully on what grounds?
A constable can search a persons mouth with consent of that person pursuant to s124 SASA 2012. The search in this case became unlawful when staff sprayed the defendant and tried to pry open his mouth.
Describe 4 qualities of a hazardous substance
- Explosive
- Flammable
- Oxidies
- Corrosive
- Toxic
- Eco toxic
Who can declare a civil emergency and what are the acts that give them powers to do so?
A constable, Fire Chief Officer or acting Fire Chief Officer. Section 136 HAZNO Act gives power to declare, section 137 allows RED DUST (remove, enter, demand, destroy, use, secure, twenty four hours…
Describe four examples of irresponsible promotion of alcohol that would warrant police action
- Promoting inappropriate consumption of alcohol
- Advertising heard or seen 25% discount promo
- Giving away for free
- Giving away for exchange of entering comp
- Advertising for minors
PAGGA