Drugs Baybee Flashcards
What must the crown prove for charges under section 12A(1)?
- That the defendant has supplied, produced, or manufactured equipment, material or precursors
-that those items are capable of being used in The production or manufacturing of controlled drugs, or the cultivation prohibited plants. - that the defendant knows those items are to be used for such an offence by another person,
what activities does the term “supplying drug” cover?
- Distribute - supplying to multiple people
- give - involves handing over or in some way transferring an item to another person
- sell - a sale occurs when a quantity or share in drug is exchanged for some valuable
Consideration
What are the two elements that the prosecution has to prove in relation to the offence of offering to supply?
- The communicating of an offer to supply or administer a controlled drug (actus reus)
- an intention that the other person believes the offer to be genuine (mens rea)
What difference does age make to the offences involving class c controlled drug?
- under 18 years old 6(1)(d) involves supplying, administer, offers to supply or administer to person under the age of 18
-over 18 s6(1)(e) only involves selling or offering to sell a class c substance to a person over the age of 18.
What four things do you have to prove for possession of a drug
Knowledge that the drug exists
Knowledge that is is a controlled drug
Actual physical control or some degree of control over it
An intention to possess it
Produce/manufacture any controlled drug
Misuse of Drugs Act 1975, Section 6(1)(b)
Imprisonment: A=life|B=14|Any other=8
Elements:
- Produce (or) manufacture
- Any controlled drug
Produce:
Definition: bring something into existence from its raw materials - eg cannabis oil
The offence of producing is complete once the prohibited substance is created, whether it is in a usable form or not.
Manufacture:
Process of synthesis - Combining raw materials to create a new substance
E.g cooking meth
R v rua - the words “produce” and “manufacture” broadly cover the creation of drugs by some form of process which changes the original substances into a particular controlled drug
R v rua - offence is complete once the prohibited substance is created, whether or not in usable form.
Any Controlled Drug:
SPAM + CDA in s2 MODA 75
Substance, Preparation, article specified, mixture + controlled drug analogue
Guilty knowledge -
Knew it was a controlled drug
Knew it was an offence
Intended to commit offence
R v Strawbridge - knowledge will be presumed if there is no evidence to the contrary. The accused need to prove they acted innocently and had no knowledge to be acquitted.
Usable quantity -
R v emerali - possession doesn’t extend to some minute or useless residue.
R v Strawbridge
Guilty knowledge:
Knowledge will be presumed if there is no evidence to the contrary. The accused need to prove they acted innocently and had no knowledge to be acquitted.
R v emerali
Usable quantity:
Possession does not extend to some minute or useless residue.
Supplying any class A or B Controlled drug
Misuse of Drugs Act 1975, Section 6(1)(c)
Imprisonment: A=life|B=14
Elements:
- Supplies | administer | offer to supply | offer to administer | or otherwise deal in
- any class A (or) class B controlled drug
- To any person
Supply:
Includes - distribute, sell, give
Distribute - supply to multiple
Sell - exchange for an valuable consideration
Give - hand over to enable use
R v Maginnis - more than transfer of physical control - it includes enabling the recipient to apply the thing
Administer:
Cause drug to be taken into system
Offer to supply/offer to administer:
R v during - ready of request to supply the drug
R v brown - offence of supply exists when offer is made with intention tat it should be understood as genuine.
Any class A or B controlled drug:
SPAM + CDA
Substance, preparation, Article specified, mixture - s2 MODA controlled drug analogue
Guilty knowledge:
KKI
Knew it was a controlled drug, knew of the offence, intended to commit offence.
R v Strawbridge - knowledge will be presumed if there is no evidence to the contrary. Accused need to prove they acted innocently and had no knowledge to be acquitted.
R v Emerali - possession does not extend to some minute or useless residue.
To any person:
Must be supplied to some person - ID not required
Proven by judicial notes/circumstantial evidence.
Top tips - administer would be injecting someone - supply is distribute, sell, give
Supplying class C controlled drug to person under 18
MODA 75, Section 6(1)(d)
Imprisonment: 8 Years
Elements:
- supply | administer | offer to supply/administer
- any class C controlled drug
- to any person under the age of 18
Supply:
Includes - distribute, give, sell
Distribute: supply to multiple
Give: hand over to enable use
Sell: exchange for valuable consideration
R v Maginnis - more than transfer of physical control, enable recipient to apply for thing
Administer:
Cause drug to be taken into system.
Offer to supply/administer:
R v during - ready on request to supply the drug
R v brown - offence of supply exists when offer is made with the intention that it should be understood as genuine
Any class C controlled drug:
SPAM + CDA s2 MODA 25 (schedule 3)
Substance, preparation, article specified, mixture
Guilty knowledge:
KKI - knew it was a controlled drug, knew about offence, intent to commit offence
R v strawbridge - knowledge will be presumed if there is no evidence to the contrary. The accused must prove they acted innocently and had no knowledge to be acquitted.
R v emerali - possession does not extend to some minute or useless residue.
To any person under the age of 18:
R v forest and forest: best evidence possible adduced regarding age (birth certificate and ID of that person named on certificate.
Top tip: key note that person is under the age of 18. If a 25 year old gives another 25 year old class c controlled drug with no exchange of medium it is not an offence against this section. It would be straight possession under s7.
Sell/offer to sell class c controlled drug to person over 18 years old
MODA 75, Section 6(1)(e)
Imprisonment 8 years
Elements:
- sell | offer to sell
- class C controlled drug
- to any person over the age of 18
Sell:
Exchange for valuable consideration
Offer to sell:
R v during: ready on request to supply drug
R v Brown: offence of supply exists when offer is made with the intention that it should be understood as genuine
Any class c controlled drug:
SPAM + CDA
Substance, preparation, article specified, mixture Schedule 3, s2 MODA 75
guilty knowledge:
KKI - knew it was a controlled drug, knew about offence, intended to commit offence
R v Strawbridge: knowledge will be presumed unless there is evidence to the contrary. The accused must prove that they acted innocently and that they had no knowledge to be acquitted.
R v emerali: possession does not extend to some minute or useless residue.
To any person over the age of 18:
JN/CE
Over age of 18
R v forest and forest: best possible evidence adduced from prosecution (birth certificate and ID of that person named on certificate)
Top tips for young players - a medium of exchange is not limited to cash - could include trading a PlayStation or bodily services for weed.
Possession of controlled drug for supply
MODA 75, Section 6(1)(f)
Imprisonment: A=life | B=14 | any other drug =8
Elements:
- have in their possession
- any controlled drug
- for any purpose set out in paragraphs (c),(d),(e)
Have in their possession:
R v cox - 2 elements - mental and physical - physical custody/control, mental knowledge/intent to possess that item.
Any controlled drug:
SPAM + CDA s2 MODA
Substance, preparation, article specified, mixture
Class A/b/c +schedule 1/2/3
Guilty knowledge:
KKI - knew about offence, knew was controlled drug, intent to commit offence
r v Strawbridge: knowledge will be presumed unless there is evidence to the contrary. Accused must prove they acted innocently and had no knowledge to be acquitted.
R v emerali : possession does not extend to some minute or useless residue.
Supply quantities?
For any purpose set out in (c)(D)(e):
Intent - there must be an intent to commit the act and get a specific result
Mike has been charged with possession of 5 grams of methamphetamine. List four things you have to prove in relation to mikes possession
KKI
- knowledge the drug existed.
- knowledge it was a controlled drug
- intent to possess the drug
- actual physical control or some degree of control over it
Possession definition
- actual custody or control
This includes potential custody or control - thus “subject to his control which is in the possession of another”
An example of this is a person is storing their drugs at a friends house. The defendant can exercise control of property through an agent however exercise of control must be established.
- mental element
Knowledge and intention to possess it.
Knowledge - the defendant must be aware they possess the substance
That it was a controlled drug
Lack of knowledge due to memory loss - court of appeal held this matter should be retrial
If more than one person has access of drugs of a saleable quantity
They may be charged jointly with possession but must prove there was a shared intention to sell the drugs
Attempted possession
It is an offence to attempt to gain possession of a drug. A charge which covers someone obtaining something innocuous in the mistaken belief that it is a drug.
Possession of drug cases
In drug cases it is necessary for the crown to that the defendant had:
- knowledge the drug exists
- knowledge it is a controlled drug
- actual physical control or some degree of control over it
- An intention to possess it
Intent
In criminal law there are two specific types of criminal intent:
- deliberate act
An act or omission deliberately done and musty be more than accidental
- produce result
Aim, object, purpose
Proving intent/proving in drug cases
R v collister. A persons intent may be inferred from the circumstance and a persons words and actions at the time of, before, after the incident and the nature of the act itself.
In drug cases intent may be proven by:
- admissions
- circumstantial evidence (scales, point bags, cash, tick lists)
- statutory presumption under s6
Statutory presumption
S6(6) of MODA 75 creates a presumption of law that if a person has possession of a specified amount of any drug, that the person will be presumed to have that drug for one purpose set out in 6(1)(C) or 7(1)(d) unless they can prove otherwise
The presumptive amount may be rebutted if the person is able to prove , on the balance of probabilities, that they did not intent to commit a dealing charge and that it was for personal use as they are a heavy drug user
Heroin - 0.5g
Cocaine - 0.5
Lysergide lsd - 2.5ml or 100 flakes/tabs
Meth - 5g
MDMA - 5g/100 pills
Cannabis resin or extract - 5g
Cannabis - 28g or 100 cigs
What are the penalties for committing an offence against subsection 1 of s6 MODA
A - life
B - 14 years
C/ any other - 8 years
What is the definition of imports
The arrival of the goods into New Zealand in any manner, whether lawfully or unlawfully, from a point outside of New Zealand
Saxton v Police
Imports case law
The import includes to introduce from abroad or to cause to be brought in from a foreign country
The importing process. When does it start and finish?
Importation is a process that commences at the point of origin and continues until the drugs have reached their ultimate destination in New Zealand.
Criminal liability arises as soon as the drugs cross New Zealand’s border and may therefore be convicted under s6(1)(a).
However this does not end a the border, the process continues whilst goods are in transit and only concludes once they reach their final destination and are available to the consignee.]
Anyone who knowingly assists up to that point may be liable as a party to the importation.
R v hancox
Imports case law
The bringing of goods into the country or causing them to be brought into the country does not cease as the aircraft or vessel enters New Zealand’s territorial limits. Importing into New Zealand for the purpose of 6(1)(a) is a process.
The element of importing exists form the time the goods enter New Zealand untill they reach their intended destination.
Section 6(1)(a)
Imports into New Zealand
Elements:
- imports
- any controlled drug
Imports:
Means the arrival of goods in New Zealand by any manner, whether lawfully or not, from a point outside New Zealand.
Saxton v Police:
To import means to introduce from abroad or to cause to be brought in from a foreign country.
R v Hancox
The bringing of goods int the country or causing them to be brought into the country does not cease as soon as the air craft of vessel enters New Zealand’s territorial limits.
Any controlled drug:
SPAM +CDA
Guilty knowledge
KKI
-Knew it was a controlled drug
- knew it was an offence
- intent to commit the offence
R v strawbridge:
Knowledge will be presumed unless there is evidence to the contrary. The accused must prove they acted innocently and had no knowledge to be acquitted
Usable quantity:
R v Emerali - possession does not extent to some minute or useless residue.
Men’s rea of importing
The crown must not only prove that the defendants conduct in some way contributed to the actual importation, they must also prove the guilty knowledge.
This will involve proof that the defendant:
- knew about the importation
- knew the imported substance was a controlled drug
- intended to cause the importation.
Wilful blindness
In terms of proving guilty knowledge for an import, proof of the defendant deliberately Turning a blind eye to the facts will suffice
Definition of New Zealand
Means the land and waters enclosed by the outer limits of the territorial sea of New Zealand. The outer limit of the territorial seas is 12 Nautical miles from the land mass of New Zealand.
Section 2 MODA 75
Controlled drug:
Means any SPAM + CDA
What is the CDA
Means any substance that has a structure substantially similar to that of any controlled drug but does not include:
- any substance described in schedules 1,2,3
- any pharmacy-only medicine or prescription medicine or restricted medicine within the meaning of the medicine act 1981
- an approved product within the meaning of the psychoactive substances act 2013
Name the class A, B, and C drugs and their statutory presumptions
A:
- heroin 0.5g
- Cocaine 0.5g
- lysergide LSD 2.5g or 100 flakes/tablets
- Meth - 5g
B:
- MDMA 5g or 100 tablets
- cannabis oil
- amphetamine
- GHB (fantasy)
- morphine
- opium
- pseudoephidrine
C:
- cannabis seeds/plant 28g or 100 cigs
- CDA
R v Strawbridge
Guilty knowledge:
Knowledge will be presumed unless there is evidence to the contrary. The accused must prove they acted innocently and had no knowledge to be acquitted.
R v emerali
Usable quantity
Possession does not extend to some minute or useless residue
R v rua
Producing/manufacturing
The words produce or manufacture in 6(1)(b) broadly cover the creation of controlled drugs by some form of process which changes the original substances into a particular controlled drug
Definition of producing
To produce means to bring something into being, Igor to bring something into existence from its raw materials or elements