Drugs Flashcards
Dealing with controlled drugs - Section 6 Misuse of Drugs Act 1975
(1) no person shall—
(a) import into or export from New Zealand any controlled drug, other than a controlled drug specified or described in Part 6 of Schedule 3; or
(b) produce or manufacture any controlled drug; or
(c) supply or administer, or offer to supply or administer, any Class A controlled drug or Class B controlled drug to any other person, or otherwise deal in any such controlled drug; or
(d) supply or administer, or offer to supply or administer, any Class C controlled drug to a person under 18 years of age; or
(e) sell, or offer to sell, any Class C controlled drug to a person of or over 18 years of age; or
(f) have any controlled drug in his possession for any of the purposes set out in paragraphs (c), (d), or (e)
Dealing with Controlled drugs - Section 6 (2A) MODA 1975
Every person who conspires with any other person to commit an offence against subsection (1) commits an offence against this Act and is liable on conviction to imprisonment for a term—
(a) not exceeding 14 years where a Class A controlled drug was the controlled drug or one of the controlled drugs in relation to which the offence was committed:
(b) not exceeding 10 years where paragraph (a) does not apply but a Class B controlled drug was the controlled drug or one of the controlled drugs in relation to which the offence was committed:
(c) not exceeding 7 years in any other case.
Supplies equipment / precursors - Section 12A (1) MODA
(1)Every person commits an offence against this Act who supplies, produces, or manufactures—
(a) any equipment or material that is capable of being used in, or for, the commission of an offence against section 6(1)(b) or section 9; or
(b) any precursor substance—
knowing that the equipment, material, or substance is to be used in, or for, the commission of an offence against those provisions.
(3) Every person who commits an offence against this section is liable on conviction,—
(a) in the case of an offence against subsection (1), to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 7 years:
Possession of equipment / precursors - Section 12A (2) MODA
(2) Every person commits an offence against this Act who has in his or her possession—
(a) any equipment or material that is capable of being used in, or for, the commission of an offence against section 6(1)(b) or section 9; or
(b) any precursor substance— with the intention that the equipment, material, or substance is to be used in, or for, the commission of an offence against that provision.
(3) Every person who commits an offence against this section is liable on conviction,—
(b) in the case of an offence against subsection (2), to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 5 years.
What was held in R v STRAWBRIDGE
It is not necessary for the crown to establish knowledge on the part of the accused. In the absence of evidence to the contrary knowledge on her part will be presumed, but if there is some evidence that the accused honestly believed on reasonable grounds that her act was innocent she is entitled to be acquitted unless the jury is satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that this was not so.
What was held in Police v EMERALI
In any drug offence the quantity involved must be measurable and useable, The serious offence of possessing a narcotic does not extend to some minute and useless residue of the substance.
What was held in R v RUA
The words produce or manufacture broadly covers the creation of controlled drugs by some process which changes the original substance into a particular controlled drug.
What was held in R v DURING
An offer is an intimation by the person charged to another that he is ready on request to supply to that other, drugs of a kind prohibited by statute.
What was held in R v BROWN in regard to genuine offer
The making of such an intimation, with the intention that it should be understood as a genuine offer, is an offence
What was held in R v BROWN in regards to ways offer could arise
- Offers to supply a drug he has on hand
- Offers to supply a drug that will be procured at some future date
- Offers to supply a drug he mistakenly believes he can supply
- Offers to supply a drug deceitfully, knowing he will not supply that drug.
What was held in Warner v Metropolitan Police Commissioner - possession
The term possession must be given a sensible and reasonable meaning in its context. Ideally a possessor of a thing has:
- Complete physical control over it
- Knowledge of its existence, its situation and its qualities
What was held in R v MAGINNIS - supply
Supply involves more than a mere transfer of physical control and includes enabling the recipient to apply the thing to purposes for which he desires.
Define imports - Section 2 Customs and Excise Act 1996
In relation to goods, means the arrival of goods into NZ in any manner, whether lawfully or unlawfully from a point outside of NZ.
What must be proved to show guilty knowledge
- Knew about the drug offending; and
- Knew the substance was a controlled drug; and
- Intended to cause the drug offending
Define controlled drug - Section 2 MODA
Any substance, preparation, mixture or article, specified or described in schedules 1, 2, or 3 of this act, and includes any controlled drug analogue.