Drug Other Flashcards
Controlled drugs are imported by a variety of methods including:
- air and sea
- having drugs concealed in or on their person, or in their luggage
- have another person bring their drugs in for them
- send or have drugs sent by international mail or courier
- conceal drugs inside legitimate goods eg shipping containers
Importation process:
Is a process that commences at point of origin and continues until the drug has reached their ultimate destination in NZ
Importation continues while the goods are in transit and only concludes when they have reached their final destination and available to the consignee
Anyone who’ knowingly assists in facilitating the process up until that point may be liable as party to the importation
Criminal liability of importation:
Criminal liability arises as soon as the drugs cross NZ boarders, therefore the drug importer may be convicted under 6(1)(a) even if the drugs are intercepted by customs before reaching the intended recipient
Mens rea of importing:
The crown must prove the defendants conduct un some way contributed to the actual importation of the drug AND the defendants guilty knowledge. This includes proof that the defendant:
- knew about the importation
- knew the imported substance was a controlled drug
- intended to cause the importation
Wilful blindenss:
In terms of proving guilty knowledge, proof that the defendant deliberately turned a blind eye will suffice. (R v Martin)
- If crown can prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused has their suspicions aroused as to what she was carrying but deliberately refrained from making further enquiries or confirming suspicion because she wanted to remain in ignorance. if that is proved, law assumes knowledge on her part
Guilty knowledge:
For a person to be guilty of an offence relating to controlled drugs they must have guilty knowledge, someone who innocently possess something they genuinely believed was not a controlled drug has a defence.
It is not necessary for the crown to prove such knowledge, it will be presumed in the absence of evidence to the contrary. It is therefore up to the defendant to raise reasonable doubt as to their state of mind.
R v Strawbridge
Mistake as to nature of controlled drug:
s29 provides that it is not a defence that the defendant did not know the substance in question was the particular controlled drug alleged. for example supplying heroine if in fact defendant believed drug was cocaine.
Proving useable quantity:
While it is necessary that the amount of controlled drug is of a useable quantity, under s29A it is not necessary for the prosecution to prove that fact unless the defendant puts the matter in issue
Producing v Manufacturing a drug
Producing can be described as changing the nature of the original substance and;
Manufacturing as creating a different or new substance from the original materials
The offence is complete once the prohibited substance is created whether or not it is in a useable form
An analogue drug is:
Any substance (other specified 1,2,3) with a structure substantially similar to a controlled drug, has similar dangerous effects but is not specifically listed in the schedules act.
Cannabis preparations:
s29B deals specifically with cannabis preparations. Cannabis preparation is produced by subjecting plant to some kind of process that renders it unrecognisable as a plant material. It is up for prosecution to prove the preparation containing any THC.
Upgrades from class C controlled drug to class B cannabis preparation.
Offering to supply or administer drugs:
This provision prohibits arousing another persons interest in controlled drugs or tempting to use them; must prove
- the communicating of an offer to supply or administer a controlled drug (actus reus)
- an intention that the other person believes the offer to be genuine (mens rea)
Four propositions regarding an offer to supply:
- offer to supply is to be given its ordinary meaning and not any technical meaning
- there may be more then one person guilty of offering to supply in one transaction
- Offer to supply has a wider meaning and includes an offer to arrange for someone else to hand over a drug to the person to be supplied
- in criminal law, every party involved may actually offer to supply or be a party to such an offer, s66, includes intermediary agent,
Otherwise deals:
Is aimed at dealing in a drug in some means other than by distributing, giving or selling it, administering it, or offering to supply or administer it. eg barter or exchange
Person under 18:
Legislation recognises the vulnerability of the young people and the fact drug use is likely to have a greater impact on them than on a adult.
Proof of age:
Where age is an essential element of a charge, must prove victims age at time of offence. eg presenting birth cert and independent evidence identifying victim as person named on birth cert. R v Forrest and Forrest
Possession
Physical element; physical custody or control over drugs. Means person actually has drugs in custody or control. Potential custody or control: defendant can exercise control of property through agent, however this control must be established.
Mental element: combination of knowledge and intention. Knowledge in the sense of an awareness substance is in his possession and also have the knowledge that what is in his possession is a controlled drug. Intention; intended to have exercised possession.
Knowledge:
- The defendant must be aware that they possess the substance
- They identify the substance as a controlled drug, even if there is no substance to be analysed
- physical custody presumes knowledge, unless otherwise proven
Knowledge and intent:
- knows they have the substance
- knows the substances qualities
- intend to use the substance in a way that allows you to charge them with possession
Joint possession:
Where more then one person has access to the drugs of saleable quantity, however must prove that there was a shared intention to sell the drugs
Attempted possession:
It is an offence to attempt to gain possession of a drug, a charge which covers someone obtaining something innocuous in the mistaken belief that it is a drug
Possession in drug cases:
- knowledge that drug exists
- knowledge that it is a controlled drug
- actual physical control or some degree of control over it
- an intention to possess it.
Purpose:
aim or intention
Intention:
Two elements: intention to commit the act and secondly, an intention to get a specific result
Deliberate act:
Intent means the act or omission must be done deliberately, more then involuntary or accidental.
Intent to produce a specific result:
Means aim, object or purpose
Proving intent:
Onus is on prosecution to prove an offenders intent beyond reasonable doubt. Offenders admissions and circumstantial evidence (cash, scales, tick-list, packaging), statutory presumption under s6(6) in which intent can be inferred. including: R v Collister
- the offenders actions and words, before, during and after event
- the surrounding circumstances
- the nature of the act itself
Statutory presumption:
s6(6)- dealing with controlled drugs;
(6) a person is presumed until the contrary is proved to be in possession of a controlled drug for any of the purposes in subsection (1)(c,d,e) if he or she is in possession of controlled drug in an amount level, or quantity at or over which the controlled drug is presumed to be for supply
Presumption that drug is for sale or supply may be rebutted if the person is able to prove they did not intend to commit a dealing offence, notwithstanding the amount. Can also be charged with possession for supply if other circumstances provide GCTS the offence. eg admissions, packaging, large amounts of money, tick lists etc