Drug Misuse And Trafficking Act Flashcards

1
Q

What is R v Dunn discuss?

A

The Crown only need prove that the accused had in his possession a prohibited drug. It is not necessary to establish that he knew that it was a prohibited drug of the kind charged.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Where do you find the drugs and quantities in the Act?

A

Schedule 1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What does section 43 of the Act cover?

A

Analyst Certificate is Prima facie. Do not need an expert certificate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is Moors v Burke about?

A

It states it doesn’t have to be in someone’s physical possession to have possession. It could be locked in a locker, it must be somewhere that they exclude others from. “Actual possession does not have to be in the present manual custody of the defendant, but can be stored elsewhere as long as the exclusion of all others” “has exclusive right or power to place hands on it”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is R v Fillipetti about?

A

If multiple people have access/possession of the drug, you cannot prove beyond reasonable doubt who was in possession. You must be able to exclude all others.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Scicluna v R is about what?

A

Drugs located in a bed side draw, it was inconceivable that an occupant of the bedroom would not have knowledge of what was in the bed side draw.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What does Williams v The Queen state about minute quantities of drugs?

A

The drug must be seen collected and weighed. Also used.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

If an item comes into your possession briefly, can it constitute an offence as per principle in R v Todd?

A

No, it is not just brief/momentary possession, you must also have knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Where do you find the definition of supply?

A

Section 3 of DMTA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the definition of supply?

A

Sell, distribute, agreeing to supply, offering, keeping or having in possession for sale, or sending, forwarding, delivering or receiving for sale or on sale,

or authorising, directing, causing, suffering, permitting or attempting any of those acts or things.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What does sell mean?

A

Dealing in, agreeing to sell, or offering or exposing for sale, or keeping or having in possession for sale, or sending, forwarding, delivering or receiving for sale.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Where do you find the traffickable quantity?

A

Column 1 of Schedule 1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the admixture rule?

A

What ever the drug is mixed with will be the weight of the drug. So baking soda with cocaine

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

An offence under part 2, division 1 of the DMTA is deemed to be a what?

A

A summary offence as per section 9. Therefore there is a statute of limitations as per section 179 of the CPA.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What section would you find the penalty for an offence under part 2, division 1?

A

Under section 21.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the value of a penalty unit and where would you find that legislated?

A

It is $110 and under section 17 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act

17
Q

What does He Kaw Teh v The Queen state?

A

That you must have knowledge and be in possession of a drug to be guilty of the offence. You cannot just have one.

18
Q

What do you need to prove for an offence under section 11 (possession of equipment for admin)?

A

Proof of intent for future use.

19
Q

What section is supply under?

A

Section 25

20
Q

R v Brown states what about an offer to supply fake drugs?

A

You will be guilty of an offence if you believed you were purchasing drugs. Even if an analysis reveals that it was not a drug

21
Q

What section of the act is the deeming provision?

A

Section 29. Do not charge under this.

22
Q

For a deemed supply offence is it sufficient to just have the traffickable quantity of drugs in your possession?

A

No, there must be some other indicia of supply. Baggies, scales etc

23
Q

What is Carey v NSWCCA say about a supply to the owner of the drugs?

A

It will not be a supply if someone who is holding drugs for another returns them to their rightful owner.

24
Q

What is a section 25A offence?

A

An ongoing supply on more than three occasions within 30 consecutive days.

25
Q

What does section 40 state?

A

For purpose of supply if you believe or purport it to be a drug then you are guilty of supplying that drug

26
Q

What is the Hamzy principle?

A

You can prosecute a supply prohibited drug case on an indictment that alleged a single count of supply between dates where several acts where committed in the course of an ongoing criminal enterprise.

27
Q

R v Kirkwood?

A

Watering a plant can constitute cultivation

28
Q

What is the definition of cultivate?

A

In regards to prohibited plants:

(a) sow or scatter the seed produced by the prohibited plant, and
(b) plant, grow, tend, nurture or harvest the prohibited plant.

29
Q

Define cannabis leaf?

A

means any plant or part of a plant of the genus Cannabis includesthe achene and seed

does not include:

(a) cannabis oil,
(b) any fibre of any such plant or part from which the resin has been extracted, or
(c) cannabis plant

30
Q

Is forgetting a prohibited drug is in a specific place a defence?

A

No, R V Martindale (forgotten possession)

31
Q

Explain s29

A

S29 is a deeming provision. Drug weights of trafficable amount and over is taken for supply. Mechanical section only, not offence creating section.

32
Q

Momentary possession in R V Thomas?

A

Somebody yelled out “Police”. Deft thew drugs off balcony which were owned by another person. Deft had knowledge of drugs. Possession was proved.