Drug Dealing (Liability) Definitions Flashcards

1
Q

Controlled drugs are imported into New Zealand by air and sea using a variety of methods. Commonly drug importers will:

A
  • have drugs concealed in or on their person, or in their luggage
  • have another person (a ‘mule’) bring the drugs in for them
  • send or have drugs sent by international mail or courier
  • conceal drugs inside legitimate goods, for example within shipping containers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are key points regarding the liability for importation, IE: when is a person still liable for the offence?

A

R v Hancox - “The element of importing beings when the goods arrive in New Zealand, until when they reach their immediate destination” i.e., they are available to the consignee or addressee.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

List some examples of Class A controlled drugs described in Schedule 1 ?

A

Class A controlled drugs are classified as such as their misuse poses a ‘very high risk’ of harm to individuals and to society.

Examples:

  • Cocaine
  • Heroin
  • Lysergide (LSD)
  • Methamphetamine
  • Psilocybine (found in magic mushrooms)

Note - the synthetic drugs AMB-FUBINACA and 5F-ADB have now been classified as Class A controlled drugs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

List some examples of Class B controlled drugs described in Schedule 2?

A

Class B controlled drugs are those that pose a ‘high risk of harm’ and include:

  • Amphetamine
  • Cannabis preparations (such as cannabis oil and hashish)
  • GHB (Fantasy)
  • MDMA (Ecstasy)
  • Morphine
  • Opium
  • Pseudoephedrine
  • Ephedrine
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

List some examples of Class C controlled drugs described in Schedule 3?

A

Class C controlled drugs pose a ‘moderate risk of harm’ and include:

  • Cannabis plant
  • Cannabis seeds
  • Benzylpiperazine (BZP)
  • Controlled drug analogues
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What two elements must the prosecution prove when dealing with an ‘offering to supply or administer charge’?

A
  • the communicating of an offer to supply or administer a controlled drug (the actus reus)
  • an intention that the other person believes the offer to be genuine (the mens rea).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Statutory Presumptive Amount

LSD
Heroin
Cocaine
Meth
MDMA
Cannabis Oil
Cannabis Plant

A

Schedule 5 MODA 1975

LSD - 2.5mg or 25 flakes, tablets
Heroin - 0.5g
Cocaine - 0.5g
Meth - 5g
MDMA - 5g or 100 flakes, tablets
Cannabis Oil - 5g
Cannabis Plant - 28g or 100 cigarettes

Where a controlled drug is not specified in Schedule 5 the presumptive amount for that drug is 56 grams.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Define “Supply”

A

“To furnish or provide something that is needed or desired”.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Define: ‘Intent’

A

Firstly there must be an intention to commit the act, and secondly an intention to get a specific result

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Define ‘Controlled Drug Analogue’

A

Any substance with a structure substantially similar to a controlled drug.

All analogues are class C drugs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

In drugs cases it will be necessary for the Crown to prove that the defendant had:

(KKCI)

A
  • knowledge that the drug exists
  • knowledge that it is a controlled drug
  • actual physical control or some degree of control over it
  • an intention to possess it
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Circumstantial evidence from which an offender’s intent may be inferred can include:

A
  • the offender’s actions and words before, during and after the event
  • the surrounding circumstances
  • the nature of the act itself.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

In drugs cases additional evidence of intent to supply may be inferred from:

A
  • admissions
  • circumstantial evidence (packaging, scales, cash, tick lists etc)
  • the statutory presumption under section 6(6).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Where age is an essential element of a charge, the prosecution must prove the victim’s age at the time of the alleged offence, what evidence would this consist of?

A

In practice this generally involves producing the victim’s birth certificate in conjunction with independent evidence that identifies the victim as the person named in the certificate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Proving possession of controlled drugs in New Zealand requires proof of two separate elements.

R v Cox held the two separate elements to be proved are….

A

Physical Element:
This element requires physical custody or control over the drugs.

This can be either actual or potential.

Mental Element:
The mental element requires a combination of knowledge and intention.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the difference between Producing v Manufacturing

A

Producing = changing the nature of the original substance

Manufacturing = creating a different substance from the original materials

17
Q

Define Analouge

A

Any substance with a structure substantially similar to a controlled drug

18
Q

How may a Defendant rebut that a drug is not for supply ?

A

They must prove on the balance of probabilities that they did not intend to commit a ‘dealing’ offence