DR GAPS Flashcards
Characteristics of Arbitration
Contract must specifically state that disputes are to be resolved by arbitration
Ruling enforceable in court
Must follow arbitration process unless parties agree otherwise
Strict rules of evidence do not apply
Decision is called a final award
Litigation
Decisions made by judge
Strict rules of evidence apply
Limitation
Limitation Act 1980
Measured from accrual of action or when C first gains knowledge
PI / Death - 3 years
Contract/Other Torts - 6 years
Clock does not start for minors until 18
Does not stop if C loses capacity
Does not run until fraud is discovered
Practice Direction - Pre-action conduct
If settlement is not achieved protocol lays groundwork for proceedings
PI Protocol Use and Aim
Mainly used for fast track
if it fails to achieve settlement then the claimant can issue proceedings
PI Protocol Claimant
Template letter covers:
- Summary of facts
- Details of injuries
-Impact of injuries
- Hospital attended
- Known financial losses
- Documents sought
- Requires response within 21 days
PI Protocol Defendant
Respond within 21 days
Then have 3 months to investigate claim
Denial must be supported with relevant evidence
Failure to follow practice directions
Sanctions
stay of proceedings to require compliance
Where to start proceedings - allocation between CC and HC
Cannot be started in the HC unless the value is more than £100k or £50k for PI
Straightforward claim of higher value can be started in CC
Part 8 Claims
Straightforward claim - no substantial dispute of facts
Issuing a claim
Stops limitation clock
Claim form sent to court
Adding, removing or substituting parties
Party may amend its statement of case at any time during proceedings with permission of court
Limitation applies
Service of proceedings
Sealed claim form must be served within 4 months inside jurisdiction
6 months outside jurisdiction
Service outside the UK
Permission not required if resident of the UK - otherwise requiried
Service of Particulars of Claim
Within 14 days of service of claim form
Service by Alternative Method
CPRs permit service by alternative method/place if there is good reason for it
Admitting claim
Court will issue judgement order
C can ask for time to pay
Acknowledging service and filing defence/counterclaim
Can request further 28 days by agreement - D must inform court of agreement (56 days in total)
Application would have to be made for longer extension
Disputing court’s jurisdiction
If application fails file defence within 14 days
Setting aside default judgement
Defendant has a real prospect of successfully defending the claim
AND
There is some other good reason why judgement should be set aside
D must act promptly
Settlement
Can reach settlement at any stage - will not carry weight unless terms of agreement unless embodied in court order (Tomlin order)
Part 20 Claim
Can be made without permission if issued before or at the same time as the defence is filed
party may serve a notice on another party that they must pay the serving party some or all of any payment if the serving party is ordered to pay the claimant
Responding to part 20 Claim
Defence / response within 14 days
Can obtain default judgement in usual way
Requests for further information
Make enquiries to other party - if they do not provide info in a reasonable period can make an application to court for further info
Objection to request for further information
Request is unnecessary, irrelevant or improper
Unable to provide information
Insufficient time to reply
It would conflict with overriding objective of CPRs
Privileged information
Amendments to statements of case
After service must have consent of all parties or permission of the court
Substituting party after limitation expiry
Limitation was current when proceedings were started and addition or substitution is necessary
Procedure for marking an interim application
Should be made as soon as it is apparent that it is necessary or desirable
If possible application should be made and heard at any hearing already listed
Should give at least 3 days’ notice unless there is a good reason - i.e. defeat purpose of application
Unless order
Made to force compliance with a rule of practice direction
Claim or part will be struct out for non-compliance