DR Amending SoS Flashcards
Changing Parties & Amending Causes of Action
When does a party require the court’s permission to amend a statement of case?
When a statement of case has been served and the written consent of all the parties has NOT been given
BEFORE Limitation period has expired
- Must be an issue between a new party & existing party which is connected to the matters in dispute AND…
- It is desirable to add the new party to resolve all matters in dispute between new & existing party
AFTER Limitation period has expired
- Cause of action: only allowed if…
a) the NEW cause of action arises out of the same facts or substantially the same facts as already in issue; OR
b) the new cause of action is an original set-off or counterclaim
c) the court directs that the limitation period will NOT apply in a personal injury action (court has discretion to disapply time limit if satisfied it is equitable to do so) - Adding Parties:
a) the Limitation Period was CURRENT when proceedings actually started; AND
b) the addition/substitution is NECESSARY, i.e., the court is satisfied that:
i) the new party is to be substituted for one that was named in CF by mistake for the new party;
ii) the claim cannot properly be carried on by/against/original party UNLESS the new party is added or substituted
iii) the original party has died or had a bankruptcy order made against them and interest/liability passed to the new party
Additional considerations of the court for adding, removing or substituting parties
- The main test to be satisfied is that the amendment is desirable
- The court will also consider the policy objective of enabling parties to be heard if their rights may be affected by a decision
- Consider the overriding objective
Permission / consent to add a party
- No one can be added as a claimant without his/her consent
- If someone refuses to be added as a claimant, they can instead be added as a defendant
The court’s permission is always required to add, remove or substitute a party, unless the claim form has not yet been served
Change in name or different person?
The court applies the Sardinia Sulcis test: ‘has the intended defendant been identified in the statements of case by reference to a description more or less specific to the particular case?’
- If yes: the amendment may permitted by the court under CPR 19.6(3)(a)
- If no: the court cannot permit the amendment