DR Advocacy Tests Flashcards
What is an application for a ‘summary judgement?’
A summary judgement is form of interim application whereby the applicant asks the court to enter a judgement before the matter has gone to trial.
What is the test the court will apply when deciding whether to grant summary judgement?
The court’s power is discretionary. The court will consider whether the applicant has demonstrated:
- That the other party has no real prospect of successfully brining/defending the claim; and
- There is no other compelling reason why the matter should be disposed of in court
What is a default judgement?
A default judgement is entered against a defendant if they fail to file their defence in the permitted time constraints. It prevents them from filing a defence which they can rely on
What is the test the court will apply when deciding whether to set aside default judgement?
The court must set aside a default judgement if it was entered before the time period for the defendant to file their defence had expired, or if an application for summary judgement/ more time to pay was pending or if the matter had already been settled.
The court has discretion to decide whether or not to grant a default judgement. They may grant if the applicant can show:
- The defendant has a real prospect of successfully defending the claim; OR
- There is another compelling reason why the judgement should be set aside/ the defendant should be allowed to defend the claim.
The court must also consider whether the application to set aside the default judgement was made promptly.
What is application for security of costs?
An interim application the defendant can make if they are concerned the claimant may not have the funds to pay their costs in the event that the claimant loses.
Court can require the claimant to pay in a bond/ security into court
What is the test the court applies when deciding whether to grant a security for costs order?
The court has discretion whether or not to grant a security of costs order.
May grant if the applicant proves one or more of these grounds:
- The claimant is a company
- . The claimant is not resident in the jurisdiction;
- There are reasonable grounds for believing that the claimant would be unable to pay the defendant’s costs if they lost;
- The claimant is a nominal claimant and there are reasonable grounds for believing that the claimant would be unable to pay the defendant’s costs if they lost the litigation;
- The claimant has changed their address since the litigation began in an attempt to avoid the consequences of litigation;
- The claimant gave a false or inaccurate address;
- The claimant has dealt with their assets in such a way that enforcing an order against them would be difficult
What is a prohibitory interim injunction?
A form of interim order whereby the applicant asks the court to enforce an injunction which prevents another party from doing something. Enforceable in contempt of court proceedings.
What is the test the court will consider when deciding whether to order a prohibitory interim injunction?
This is a discretionary order. The court may enforce it if the applicant can prove:
- There is a serious question to be tried; and
- That damages would not be an adequate remedy for loss suffered; and
- The balance of convenience falls in favour of an interim injunction
Court may consider whether applicant would be willing to give a cross undertaking in damages in the event that the court decides the injunction was wrongly ordered.
What is a variation of directions?
The court has the authority to vary the directions imposed under the CPR if it is in line with the overriding objective.
What will the court consider when deciding whether to vary its directions?
The applicant must first refer to the directions under the CPR it is seeking to vary. If it is seeking to vary the disclosure requirements, for example, should refer to CPR 31 and if seeking to vary expert requirements CPR 35.
Should then state how variation will allow court to deal with claim in line with the CPR overriding objective- to deal with cases fairly, proportionately, and at a reasonable cost.
What is an unless order?
An unless order is a form of interim application.
Served on a party who has breached court order stating sanctions to be imposed unless they comply with certain requirements.
What will the court consider when deciding whether to enforce an unless order?
The court has discretion whether to enforce an unless order. The applicant must show that:
- The other side has breached a court order; and
- They have complied with the court order; and
- Enforcing the unless order is in line with the CPR overriding objective to ensure compliance will court orders/ deal with matters fairly, proportionately and at a reasonable cost
What is an application to strike out?
A form of interim application to strike out (cancel) the claim.
What must the court consider when deciding whether to strike out a claim?
The court has discretion whether or not to strike out a claim. May strike out a claim if an applicant can prove:
- That the statement of case discloses no reasonable ground for defending/ bringing the claim; or
- The claim or defence is an abuse of court process; or
- There has been a breach of procedural rules, failure to pay court costs or court order
When would the court impose sanctions?
Sanctions may include a claim being struck out if a party has failed to comply with a court order/ rule/ practice direction/sanctions for non-payment of court fees