Documents

Question 1

Federalist 10

Answer 1

a strong, united republic would be more effective than the individual states at controlling “factions”
 a large republic will help control factions because when more representatives are elected, there will be
a greater number of opinions. Therefore, it is far less likely that there will be one majority oppressing
the rest of the people.

Question 2

Brutus I

Answer 2

 an Antifederalist series of essays designed to encourage New Yorkers to reject the proposed
Constitution
 the immense power of the federal government requires the people to sacrifice their liberties
 a bill of rights was necessary to protect the people from the government
 Congress possesses far too much power: taxation, standing army, taxes, Elastic Clause
 a free republic cannot exist in such a large territory as the United States
 Judicial authority will broaden federal gov’t’s power (thus, tyranny)

Question 3

Declaration of Independence

Answer 3

All people created equal (Natural Rights of Life, Liberty, Property)
 Governments are created to protect these rights
 If Gov’t does not protect these rights, then the People have the duty to change/destroy
 Imperfect gov’ts should not be destroyed, only ones that seek to subject the People to Tyranny
(destruction of Natural Rights)

Question 4

Articles of Confederation

Answer 4

Confederation of states, with an extremely limited central government.
 limitations placed upon the central government rendered it ineffective at governing the continually
growing American states
 Each state remains sovereign
 Unicameral legislature, each state one vote
 No President, No Judiciary
 Could not force taxation; No standing Army

Question 5

Federalist 51

Answer 5

Proposes a government broken into three branches: Executive, Legislative, and Judicial.
 Each branch should be self-sufficient, but each should have some kind of power over the other in order
for them to keep each other from taking over the government.
 The Legislative branch needs to be split further into the House of Representatives and the Senate
because it’s the most powerful branch, and members of the Judicial branch need to be chosen by the
President with the Senate’s approval because they want qualified candidates for a position that lasts
for life.
 This style of government also helps keep down the power of factions, a recurring theme from
Federalist 10.

Question 6

Federalist 70

Answer 6

Argues that unity in the executive branch is a main ingredient for both energy and safety. Energy arises
from the proceedings of a single person, characterized by, “decision, activity, secrecy, and dispatch,”
while safety arises from the unitary executive’s unconcealed accountability to the people.
 Justifies executive strength by claiming that the slow-moving Congress, a body designed for
deliberation, will be best-balanced by a quick and decisive executive.
 Also maintains that governmental balance can only be achieved if each branch of government
(including the executive branch) has enough autonomous power such that tyranny of one branch over
the others cannot occur.
 Makes the case for duration, meaning a presidential term long enough to promote stability in the
government.
 Support can be defined as a presidential salary, which insulates government officials from corruption
by attracting capable, honest men to office.
 Support can be defined as a presidential salary, which insulates government officials from corruption
by attracting capable, honest men to office.

Question 7

Federalist 78

Answer 7

As “the weakest of the three departments of power,” the Judiciary needs strengthening.
 Without an independent judiciary, any rights reserved to the people by the Constitution “would
amount to nothing,” since the legislature cannot be relied upon to police itself.
 lifetime appointments, guaranteed “during good behavior” to insure that judges can resist
encroachments from the legislature (to which presumably they would be vulnerable by means of
bribes or threats)

Question 8

Letter from a Birmingham Jail

Answer 8

King argues that he and his fellow demonstrations have a duty to fight for justice.
 It is up to the oppressed to take charge and demand equality.
 Segregation is used to debase one population (blacks) while uplifting another (whites), which makes it
immoral in the eyes of God. Immoral laws are laws that are neither just nor fair. According to St.
Augustine’s logic, unjust laws aren’t actually laws, so they don’t have to be followed. King believes
people are under a moral obligation to oppose segregation by refusing to abide by the so-called laws
that govern the practice.
 White Americans who say they agree with the notion of desegregation but criticize the manner in
which civil rights activists go about achieving it are the biggest obstacle standing in the way of racial
equality. The demeaning and “paternalistic” attitude of white moderates shows a lack of real
understanding about the realities of segregation. It is this group that perpetuates the notion that time,
not human intervention, will be the great equalizer—which discourages others to join the campaign for
civil rights.
 The civil rights movement will ultimately be successful because “the goal of America is freedom.”