Doctrine of subrogation & contribution Flashcards
What is subrogation
Insurer claims against third party for damage caused to insured
John Edwards v Motor Union
States that the principal of subrogation is that it does not become operative until actual payments are made by the insurer
Morris v Ford Motor
Court held that where the risk of a servant’s negligence is covered by insurance, his employer can’t seek to make him liable nor can subrogation occur
Page v Scottish Corpn
Insurers had no right to be subrogated to because they had not settled in all the clad under the policy relating to the accident
Scottish Union & National insurance v Co
Insurer couldn’t claim under subrogation because despite them making payment they did not settle policy requirements which included fixing the car
HSBC Rail(UK) v Network Rail
Insurer is only able to sue under the insured’s name
Simpson & Co v Thompson
Insurers can’t claim under subrogation where the property and cause of damage are both owned by the insurer thus insured can’t sue themself
Castelliain v Preston
An insurance policy is a contract of indemnity thus insurers can only recover what they paid to the vendor
What’s Contribution
This is where insured takes out more than one policy on the same risk thereby giving the insurers an option to each contribute to the loss
Contribution exist were more than one policy exit at the same time
Yorkshire insurance v Nisbet Shipping
Insurers can’t recover more than they paid the insured from the insured
The Sea insurance v Hadden
Abandonment entitles the insurers to every benefit the insured’s entitled to in respect of the contract but nothing more