Dissolution and Divorce Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Non-Marital Relationship Dissolution

What are the formal nonmarital structures?

A
  • domestic partnerships (file notice of dissolution at govt office)
  • civil unions (dissolve same manner as marriage)
  • reciprocal beneficiaries
  • designated beneficiaries

if no state involvement in creation of non-marital, no state involvement in dissolution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Fault-Based Divorce

What does a spouse have to do to prove fault-based divorce?

A
  • file a divorce petition in an adversarial proceeding
  • prove that the D spouse’s conduct violated statutorily enumerated ground for divorce, and
  • establish that the moving spouse is innocent and blameless

if the moving spouse has any fault, no divorce is granted.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Fault-Based Divorce

What were the grounds for fault-based?

A
  • Cruelty
  • Adultery
  • Indignities to the Person
  • Actual or Constructive Desertion
  • Willful Neglect

the concept of guilt/innocent, fault/liability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Fault-Based Divorce

Why choose fault-based divorce?

A
  • PRACTICAL: can be a factor in context of spousal support, child custody, and division of property.
  • CULTURAL: may give client satisfaction of moral settlement and showing who’s right or wrong; related to shame in culture, fault could alleviate that.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Fault-Based Divorce

What are the benefits and consequences of fault?

A
  • encourages foresight before getting married
  • if divorce is easy, then people could get married for practical reasons because it’s easy to get out of.
  • state involvement gives sense of closure
  • accused spouses may assert defenses
  • has to prove other party’s at fault
  • negative effect on children
  • for adultery, requires third party to appear and corroborate.
  • incentivizes adversarial nature which leads to more disputes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Fault-Based Divorce

What do courts consider when assigning fault?

A
  • who caused the marriage to end or assign blame?
  • who is morally at fault?
  • who caused the downfall of marriage?

asks judge to rely on moral intuition of right/wrong

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Benscoter v. Benscoter

What is Indignities to Persons?

A
  • course of conduct that displays problematic behavior
  • if provoked by other party, not eligible for divorce unless retaliation=excessive.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Benscoter v. Benscoter

On what grounds is divorce not eligible under?

A

illness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Benscoter v. Benscoter

What is the holding and reasoning of the Court?

A
  • Mr. B wasn’t eligible for divorce because illness is not grounds for divorce.
  • The standard for fault is to determine whether the accused spouse is truly at fault
  • and then determine whether the moving spouse is an “innocent and injured spouse”
  • in this case, Mr. B was having an affair so not innocent.
  • Court decides not to find him at fault because does not want to let him off easy and does not want wife to be left without support since she’s ill.

verbal abuse was not sufficient to show indignities to a person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Rankin v. Rankin

How do you prove cruel & barbarous treatment?

A
  • must show actual violence or reasonable apprehension of the same + endangers the life or health and renders cohabitation unsafe.

verbal abuse was not sufficient and conflictng evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Rankin v. Rankin

How do you prove desertion?

A

*must be shown that the spouse has been “willfully and maliciously put out in the common habitation by force or justifiable fear of immediate bodily harm or locked out against his will.”

no evidence he didn’t return bc of fear

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Rankin v. Rankin

Holding?

A
  • moving spouse must prove fault by clear & convincing evidence.
  • unhappiness alone does not merit divorce.
  • Demonstrates the need to meet specific fault-based criteria and the court’s focus on determining the “innocent” spouse.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Ricketts v. Ricketts

Holding?

A
  • Living in separate bedrooms or ceasing marital relations doesn’t establish desertion because the couple agreed to the arrangement.
  • actual desertion is the leaving; constructive desertion is render continuance of the marriage unbearable – here it is the departing party who has the cause of action for divorce
  • grants a limited divorce which allows them to live separately but does not sever marital bond
  • there must be intent to leave marriage
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Ricketts v. Ricketts

What are the two types of divorce talked about in this case?

A
  • a limited divorce which allows them to live separately but does not sever marital bond
  • in contrast, absolute divorce severs bond and entitles spouse to remarry
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Kucera v. Kucera

What fault-based defense is used in this case? What is the effect?

A
  • A showing of recrimination = divorce automatically denied. No discretion.
  • Recrimination = legal defense to divorce by making similar allegations to other parties.
  • Both parties verbally abused each other
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Gilmartin v. Gilmartin

how do you show condonation?

A
  • In order to show condonation by his wife (of his porn addiction), wife must have actual knowledge of the marital misconduct on which allegations of fault are based and have voluntarily resumed the relationship (inference of forgiveness without express statement)
  • each ground of marital fault must be individually condoned to be successful.

she did not know that he was still watching porn and that he was seeing other women online, and lied to her.

sex can be evidence of forgiveness, but not always.

17
Q

Fault-Based Defenses

What are the fault-based defenses?

A
  • Recrimination
  • Condonation
  • Connivance (consented to/encouraged misconduct beforehand)
  • Collusion (conspired to allege wrongdoing)
18
Q

No-Fault Divorce

What are the bases for no-fault?

A
  • Incurable insanity
  • Irreconciable differences

court will assess whether marriage has truly failed and beyond rehabilitation

19
Q

Desrochers v. Desrochers

Holding?

A
  • Two-year separation and insistence on divorce show marriage breakdown.
  • focuses on the irretrievable breakdown of the marriage rather than specific fault.
20
Q

No-Fault Divorce

What is the set standard on irreconciable differences?

A
  • vague but
  • The test is the existing state of the marriage;
  • is the relationship irretrievably broken or not?
  • instead of looking at who did what and when, that is a question of fact.
  • and the standard of review on appeal is going to be highly deferential to the TC’s determination
  • one party wanting to continue the marriage may be evidence of possible reconciliation, but it is not a bar to divorce.
21
Q

Nieters v. Nieters

Holding?

A
  • Court must find evidence of irreconcilable differences for no-fault divorce dependent on statutes.
  • shows the varying standards for proving irreconcilable differences
  • wife contested no-fault, and court agreed because not enough evidence.
22
Q

Nieters v. Nieters

What factors were relevant under this statute?

A
  • Adultery and petitioner finds it intolerable
  • Respondent behaved in way petitioner cannot reasonably live with
  • Respondent abandoned petitioner for a continuous period of time for a least six months
  • Parties have lived separately and apart by mutual consent for a continuous twelve months
  • That the parties have lived separate and apart for a continuous period of at least twenty-four months
23
Q

Sinha v. Sinha

Holding?

A
  • Intent to end marriage must precede the separation period for no-fault divorce.
  • Physical separation alone is insufficient.
  • Highlights the requirement of both separation and the intention to dissolve the marriage.
24
Q

No-Fault Based Divorce

What are the factors for no-fault generally?

A
  • Mutual consent for divorce
  • Mutual separation
  • Length of separation
  • Cohabitation after separation
  • Unilateral divorce
  • Judiciary inquiry – the Nieters court identified specific factors indicating a breakdown while Desrochers declined to specify particular factors
25
Q

Boddie v. Connecticut

Holding?

A
  • Denying access to divorce due to court fees violates Due Process.
  • recognizes a fundamental right to access courts for divorce.
  • State monopoly on divorce requires providing a pathway, even for those unable to pay fees.