Dispute Resolution Flashcards
What is the overriding objective?
1.1 - Dealing with cases justly and at proportionate cost
How does S52(2)(a) of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 define a CFA?
‘an agreement with a person providing advocacy or litigation services
which provides for his fees and expenses, or any part of them, to be payable only in specified
circumstances’
What are the requirements for a valid CFA under ss 58 and 58A of the Courts and Legal
Services Act 1990?
(a) may be entered into in relation to any civil litigation matter, except family proceedings;
(b) must be in writing; and
(c) must state the percentage by which the amount of the fee that would be payable if it were
not a CFA is to be increased (the success fee). (additional - fee cannot be more than 100%)
If a client has a CFA and wins the case a success fee is usually payable, can this be recovered from the other side?
No
Name advantages and disadvantages of arbitration as a form of ADR
Advantages -
- may be quicker
- less formal and private
- solutions reached are often practical
- decision is binding (can apply to High Court as if it was a court judgment (AA Act 1966 S66)
Disadvantages
Certain remedies such as injunctions are not available
may not receive depth of investigation that a court can provide
not always cheaper
What does Rule 1.4(1)(2)(e) say about ADR?
It encourages the parties to use an alternative dispute resolution procedure if the court considers that
appropriate and facilitating the use of such procedure.
What ADR process does this describe?
A third party receives written statements from both parties. Following that, the mediator will discusses the case with
the parties on a WP basis. He can then move the parties towards
constructive solutions to the problem.
Mediation - remember do not have to be in the same place, mediation can take place by telephone.
Describe ‘Med-arb’
Parties agree to submit their dispute to mediation and, if this does not work they will refer to arbitration.
Describe ‘mini trial’ or ‘structured settlement procedure’
Parties appoint a neutral siting as a chairman of a tribunal composed of himself and senior reps of both parties. They will then hear/read the cases, negotiate with the help of an independent arbitrator.
Describe ‘Expert Appraisal’
Parties refer dispute to expert in a disputed field. His opinion is not binding but may influence negotiations.
What method of ADR is this?
A former judge or senior counsel give a quick prelim view on the legal position havign heard from the parties. It is an agreement between the parties whether this will be binding.
Judicial appraisal
What is the difference between expert appraisal and expert determination?
Parties agree expert to decide case and agree to accept decision and can sue in breach of contract if they do not.
Difference between expert determination and arbitration?
Cannot be enforced as a court order but may be enforced in breach of contract. Unlike arbitrator expert may be sued in negligence.
Describe final offer arbitration
The parties can instruct their chosen neutral that they will both make an offer of the terms on
which they will settle, and that he must choose one of those two offers and no other solution.
62 Civil Litigation
Neither party can afford to make an unrealistic offer, because that will mean that the neutral
will choose the opponent’s offer. Thus, at least in theory, the offers are likely to be realistic.
Describe Early Neutral Evaluation
this method allows the parties to instruct their chosen neutral to make a
preliminary assessment of the facts at an early stage in the dispute. Normally the parties
submit written case summaries and supporting documents. The evaluator then makes a
recommendation. This very often helps the parties to negotiate a settlement (or move to
another ADR method), avoiding the expense of litigation. Rule 3.1(2)(m) of the CPR 1998
provides that the court may take any step or make any order for the purpose of managing the
case and furthering the overriding objective (see 1.1.1), including hearing an early neutral
evaluation with the aim of helping the parties to settle the case