Dispute Resolution Flashcards
Main Civil Courts
County Court, High Court (Tribunal and Appeal Tribunals), Court of Appeal and Supreme Court
County Court claims
Personal injury claim worth less than £50,000 or non personal injury claim worth up to £100,000
High Court claims
Over £100,000 or £50,000 claims can be in either court. Financial value of the claim (disregard interest, costs, counterclaim, contributory negligence and deduction of social security benefits), complexity of facts/legal issues/remedies/procedures or the importance to the public
High Court: Chancery Division
Insolvency and Companies list, Revenue List, Competition List, Business List, Property, Trusts and Probate List, Intellectual Property List
High Court: King’s Bench Division
General KBD List, Administrative Court, Planning Court, Commercial Court, Circuit Commercial Courts, Technology and Construction Court, Admiralty Court, Financial List (part of both KBD and Chancery Division and hears financial disputes of £50million or more in value)
Judges Hierarchy
County Court (Deputy District Judges, District Judges, Recorders or Circuit Judges), High Court (High Court Judges and High Court Masters), Court of Appeal (Judges of the Court of Appeal), Supreme Court (Justices of the Supreme Court)
Solicitors
Can only carry out advocacy in the Magistrate’s Court, County Court, Tribunals and Appeal Tribunals
Judicial Leaders
Lord Chief Justice (most important), Master of the Rolls (second most important), President of the Family and King’s Bench Division, Chancellor of the High Court
Overriding objective
Court to deal with cases justly and at proportionate cost (parties at equal footing, saving expense, proportionate dealings to the amount of money involved, importance of the case, complexity of the issues and financial position of each party), ensuring case is dealt with expeditiously and fairly, alloting to each case an appropriate share of the court’s resources, enforcing compliance with rules, practice directions and orders
Case analysis: Duty, breach, causation, loss, parties and limitation
Contract/tortious duty, breach of contract or tortious duty or both, did the breach of duty cause the claimant a loss, was it foreseeable (not too remote), what is the amount of the loss, who are the parties, who should the claimant bring its claim against, one or more parties, issues of limitation?
Burden of proof
Falls on the party who asserts it, the claimant must prove: duty, breach, causation and loss for negligence, duty(existence and terms of contract), breach, causation and loss for contract, the defendant must prove: contributory negligence (if any), why the defendant’s version of the facts is correct and hence the claimant’s version must be wrong
Standard of proof
Balance of probabilities, formal admissions, presumptions (the facts speak for themselves), inferences of fact
Costs
Solicitor’s fees, disbursements, court fees, counsel’s fees, expert’s fees, other costs(photocopying, travel costs, search fees)
Power
Court has a broad discretion to determine whether one party should pay the other’s costs or if each party will simply pay its own costs and how much should be paid
General Rule
Unsuccessful party will be ordered to pay the costs of the successful party and will normally follow the event
Discretion
Court can make a different order and will consider the conduct of the parties and whether a party has succeeded on all of its case or only part and the parties’ conduct (relation to ADR/offers to settle)
Example
When one party unreasonably refuses to engage in ADR the burden is on the unsuccessful party to show why there should be a departure from the general rule for this particular reason
Limit on recovery
If the court does determine that one party will pay another party’s costs, it will decide how much and when it should be paid and as a general rule will only allow a reasonable and proportionate sum to be recovered
Solicitor-client costs
indemnity principle provides that a party will not be able to recover a sum in excess of their liability to their own solicitor
inter-party costs
Actual figure for costs awarded by court which one party has to pay the other party
Non-party costs
court has jurisdiction to award costs against a non-party if it is just and are usually exceptional
Pre-Action Protocols
Consider whether another form of ADR might allow them to avoid proceedings, silence in response to an opponent’s suggestion of ADR can itself be deemed unreasonable conduct
Consequences of non-compliance
Increasing the amount of costs/interest to be paid while decreasing the amount to be received and court may stay the proceedings until compliance has occurred
Justified instances of non-compliance
Where a limitation period is about to expire it may be necessary to issue proceedings before there is time to comply with the pre-action requirements and ordinarily will need to apply for a stay of proceedings after issue in order that the pre-action procedure can be followed
Justified instances of non-compliance
Where there is another reason for urgent proceedings or for the element of surprise eg when a party can apply to court for a search order which allows an unannounced visit to the opponent’s premises to search for documents when it is feared that the opponent will destroy documents rather than honour an obligation to provide them to the claimant/court
Pre-action protocol for personal injury claims
Likely to be allocated to the fast track (value of up to £25,000)
Practice Direction
Applies to all cases but where a specific protocol applies, the provisions of that specific protocol override any conflicting provisions of the Practice Direction
Pre-action Protocol for Personal Injury Claims
Claimant should write letter of notification to potential defendant giving brief details, to enable defendant to notify its insurer, parties consider any rehabilitation needs (ongoing medical and care needs) and how to address them, claimant should write to defendant to give full details of the claim (Letter of Claim), defendant to acknowledge Letter of Claim within 21 days, defendant to investigate and send full letter of response within 3 months of letter acknowledging claim, if the defendant denies liability or quantum (or both) then the parties should disclose key documents, engage in appropriate negotiations and make proposals for settlement, claimant should send schedule of losses giving details of losses, joint selection of quantum expert (medical expert) or claimant discloses report and defendant sends written questions
Practice Direction
Claimant should write to potential defendant to give details of the claim (Letter of Claim), within a reasonable period (depending on complexity of claim), defendant should send a response letter which must either accept or reject the claim (in whole or in part) - giving reasons, parties should disclose key documents, engage in appropriate negotiations and make proposals for the settlement
Limitation Act 1980
If proceedings are not commenced within the relevant limitation period, the claimant will be barred from recovering damages and on this basis, the defendant will have a full defence
Personal Injury Claims
Claimant must bring the claim within 3 years of the lates of: the date when the cause of action accrued or the date of knowledge of the person injured
Fatal accidents
People who were dependent on the employee (children) can claim compensation from the employer, the claim cannot be brought if the person injured could no longer bring a claim (after 3 years from the later of date of death, the date of knowledge of the dependent)