DISPUTE ADVOCACY Flashcards

1
Q

What conditions need to be satisfied for an interim payment order?

**not evidence

A
  • D admitted liability to pay damages
  • C got judgement for damages against D to be assessed
  • If claim went to trial, claimant would obtain judgement for a substantial amount of money against the defendant
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What must the evidence demonstrate for an interim application costs order?

A

COSTS CERTAINTY
- Sum sought and why
- Likely final judgement sum
- PI — special damages, past and future loss

LEGAL TECHNICALITY
- Explain why the conditions are satisfied
- Fatal accidents — on whose behalf the claim is made and nature of the claim

Discretionary
- All other relevant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the general amount of money you an apply for in an interim application?

A
  • Must be an amount proportionate to the final judgement
    • Take into account contributory neg., set off and counterclaim
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the grounds for security for costs?

A
  • With regard to all circumstances of the case, it is just
  • One + of the prescribed conditions/rules are satisfied
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the conditions for security for costs?

A

ADDRESS
- Claimant is resident out of jurisdiction
- C changed address since claim started to try and make it more difficult
- C didn’t give an address in the claim form

NO MONEY
C is company, there is reason to believe will not be able to pay debts
C is a nominal claimant and there is reason to believe will be unable to pay D’s costs if ordered

ESCAPE ARTIST
C took steps with assets to make enforcement more difficult

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What does it mean for a claimant to be out of jurisdiction?

A
  • Individual: Habitual/normal residence
  • Company: where their central management/control is exercised
  • *Not England or Wales
    • OR Hague convention
      • UK, EU, Mexico, Singapore, Montenegro
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What do you have to show to prove a company won’t be able to pay debts?

A
  • Amount of likely costs
  • TEST: ‘WILL be unable’ not MAY… ‘REASON to believe WILL not be able”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What factors will the court consider regarding security for costs orders?

A

MAIN
- Ability of respondent to comply with security for costs order (b/c otherwise case is thrown)

LIKELIHOOD OF WINNING
- If D already admitted liability —> less chance of success B/C trial should continute
- Claim doesn’t appear genuine —> more chance of success

D’S A DOUCHE
- Delay —> less chance of success
- If D is responsible for C’s financial difficulties —> less success
- If D is using application aggressively —> less success

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the 3 guidelines for an interim injunction order?

A

Step 1: Is there are serious question to be tried?
Step 2: Would damages be an adequate remedy?
Step 3: The balance of convenience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How will the court determine whether there is a serious question to be tried for an interim injunction order?

A

Must be a pre-existing cause of action, is not an action on its own is a remedy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How will court consider whether damages are an adequate remedy for an interim injunction order?

A

Would money be adequate compensation if the harm caused by no injunction happened?

Is the other party likely able to pay those damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How will the court consider the balance of convenience for an interim injunction order?

A
  • Very broad range — consider: what carries the lesser risk of injustice
  • Equitable principals
    • Must have practical purpose
    • Clean hands
    • Excessive delay
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the grounds for summary judgement?

A
  • Claimant has no real prospect of success OR
  • D has no real prospect of successfully defending the claim AND
  • There is no other compelling reason why the case of issue should be disposed of at trial
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What does no real prospect of success mean for summary judgement?

A
  • Fanciful, imaginary or false
  • If there is ANY chance of success, will go through
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What does a compelling reason mean for summary judgement? (examples)

**to continue to go to trial

A

Case Could Strengthan in Future
- D needs more time to investigate
- Expert evidence is needed
- Scrutiny of key documents
- Multi-party litigation

Rights/Justice
- D has right to trial by jury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What must claimant show to be granted a default judgement?

A
  • Date judgement was entered, time for filing acknowledgement/defence had expired
  • Claim not admitted or satisfied by D
  • No application for summary or strike out has been made by D
17
Q

On what grounds can the court set aside a default judgement?

A

Court MUST set aside: If judgement was entered wrongly
- e.g., the conditions to set aside were not actually met

Court MAY set aside: If judgement was correctly entered

18
Q

What factors will the court consider when deciding whether or not to set aside a correctly entered default judgement?

A

- If D has a real prospect of defending claim
- If there is some other good reason, mostly from C’s failures/bad conduct:
- Claimant lulled the D into believing a claim was not forthcoming
- C failed to serve a response pack
- C raises issues which are in public interest
- Overriding objective
- Delays

19
Q

What else will the court consider when deciding whether or not to set aside default judgement?

20
Q

What are the tests in Denton?

A
  • Denton and Others
    • Is the breach serious or significant? If not — give relief
      • Imperilled hearing/disrupted litigation
      • NOT conduct of parties
    • If yes —> why did the default occur?
    • Evaluate all circumstances of the case
      • Override
      • Enforce compliance
21
Q

When is Denton used?

A

Relief from sanction
*also to set aside default judgement

22
Q

What will the court evaluate when considering relief from sanction?

A

General overriding objective

Denton

23
Q

What conditions have to be met so that the court MAY make a pre-action disclosure order?

A
  • Respondent AND applicant likely to be a party to subsequent proceedings
  • These docs would likely be included in standard disclosure of future proceedings (scope cannot be wider than ordinary standard disclosure)
  • Pre-Action Disclosure is desirable to
    • Dispose fairly of anticipated proceedings
    • Assist the dispute to be resolved without proceedings
    • Save money
24
Q

What is included in standard disclosure?

A
  • Documents which you rely and
  • Documents which
    • Adversely effect your case or somebody else’s
    • Support another parties case
  • Documents you’d be required to disclose by a practice direction
25
What grounds must be satisfied for strike out?
- Statement of case discloses **no reasonable grounds** for bringing or defending a claim - E.G., is not based in a matter of law, doesn’t give reasons for denial - Statement of case is an **abuse** of the courts process or likely to obstruct the just disposal of proceedings - ‘using that process for a purpose or in a way significantly different from its ordinary and proper use’ - There has been a **failure to comply** with a rule, practice direction or order
26
When will without notice applications be allowed?
PERMITTED WHEN **TIMING** - Urgency - Not enough time to serve notice before hearing date **COURT CHOICE** - Overriding objective is furthered - Court gives permission - Court order, rule or practice direction permits **Co-Operation** Parties consent
27
What will the court consider when looking at specific disclosure/inspection?
- Circumstances of the case - Overriding objective (proportionate, just) - If other party has ‘failed to adequately comply with directions for disclosure) —> will grant OR - Their disclosure was in fact adequate - More than standard disclosure is required here e.g., because these documents may lead to another train of docs
28
What will the court consider when deciding whether to make a third party disclosure order?
- Documents will have useful effect for either party - Overriding objective
29
What will the courts consider when deciding whether to make a Norwich pharmacol order?
- Ultimate wrongdoer (e.g., breacher) - There is a need for an order to enable action to be brought against the ultimate wrongdoer - e.g., info can’t be obtainable another way - Person against whom the order is sought must - Be more than a witness or bystander (some greater involvement, not necessarily in fault) - Be able to (or likely able to) provide the info - *Must be necessary and proportionate in all cases | e.g., order needed for medical info
30
What CPR section deals with summary judge?
24
31
What CPR section deals with strike out?
3.4
32
What CPR section deals with relief from sanctions?
3.9
33
What CPR section deals with specific disclosure?
31.12
34
What CPR section deals with default judgement?
12
35
What CPR section deals with setting aside default judgement?
13
36
When will the court allow additional witness evidence?
The Court will allow additional witness evidence if it is relevant, necessary for a just resolution, and proportionate, If deadlines have passed, the party must seek relief from sanctions under CPR 3.9, satisfying the Denton three-stage test."
37
What points are taken into account under the overriding objective?
Parties on equal footing Proportionate as to: - costs at stake - case importance - complexity - finances of each party - appropriate share of court resources - compliance
38