Discounted Cash Flow - Basic Flashcards
Walk me through a DCF
A DCF values a company based on the Present Value of its Cash Flows and the Present value of its terminal value.
- Project out o company’s financials using assumptions for revenue growth, expenses and working capital, then you get down to Free Cash Flow for each year, which you then sum up and discount to a Net Present Value, based on your discount rate - usually the WACC
Once you have the PV of the cash flows, you determine the company’s Terminal Value, using either the Multiples Method or the Gordon Growth Method, and then also discount that back to its Net Present Value using WACC.
Walk me through how you get from Revenue to Free Cash Flow in the projections
Subtract COGS and Operating Expenses to get to Operating Income (EBIT). Then, multiply by (1 - Tax Rate), add back Depreciation and other non-cash charges, and subtract Capital Expenditures and the charge in Working Capital.
What’s an alternate way to calculate Free Cash Flow aside from taking Net Income, adding back Depreciation, and subtracting Changes in Operating Assets / Liabilities and CapEx?
Take Cash Flow from operations and subtract CapEx - that gets you to Levered Cash Flow. To get to Unlevered Cash Flow, you then need to add back the tax-adjusted Interest Expense and subtract the tax-adjusted Interest Income.
Why do you use 5 or 10 years for DCF projections?
That’s usually about as far as you can reasonably predict into the future. Less than 5 years would be too short to be useful, and over 10 years is too difficult to predict for most companies.
What do you usually use for the discount rate?
Normally, you use WACC, though you might also use cost of equity depending on how you’ve set up the DCF.
How do you calculate WACC?
The formula is cost of equity * (% Equity) + Cost of Debt * (% debt) * (1-Tax Rate) + (cost of preferred) * (% preferred)
How do you calculate the Cost of Equity?
Cost of Equity = Risk-Free Rate + Beta * Equity Risk Premium
How do you get to Beta in the Cost of Equity?
You look up the Beta for each comparable company, unlever each one, take the median of the set and then lever it based on your company’s capital structure.
Un-levered Beta = Levered / (1+((1-Tax Rate)*(Total Debt/Equity)))
Why do you have to un-lever and re-lever Beta?
Keep the apples-to-apples theme
When you look up the Beta on Bloomberg they will be levered to reflect the debt already assumed by each company.
Would you expect a manufacturing company or a technology company to have a higher beta?
A technology company, because technology is viewed as a “riskier” industry than manufacturing.
Let’s say that you use Levered Free Cash Flow rather than Unlevered Free Cash Flow in your DCF - what is the effect?
Levered Free Cash Flow gives you equity value rather than Enterprise value, since the cash flow is only available to equity investors.
If you use Levered Free Cash Flow, what should you use as the Discount Rate?
You would use the Cost of Equity rather then WACC since we’re not concerned with Debt or Preferred Stock in this case - we’re calculating Equity Value, not Enterprise Value.
How do you calculate the Terminal Value?
You can either apply an exit multiple to the company’s year 5 EBITDA, EBIT or Free Cash Flow (Multiples Method) or you can use the Gordon Growth method to estimate its value based on its growth rate into perpetuity.
This formula is Terminal Value = year 5 Free cash flow * (1+Growth Rate) / (Discount Rate - Growth Rate)
Why would you use Gordon Growth rather than the Multiples Method to calculate the Terminal Value?
In banking, you almost always use the Multiples Method to calculate Terminal Value in a DCF. It’s much easier to get appropriate data for exit multiples since they are based on Comparable Companies - picking a long-term growth rate, by contract is always a shot in the dark.
What’s an appropriate growth rate to use when calculating the Terminal Value?
Normally you use the country’s long term-term GDP growth rate, the rate of inflation, or something similarly conservative.
For companies in mature economies, a long-term growth rate over 5% would be quite aggressive since most developed economies are growing at less than 5% per year.