Disclosure and Inspection Flashcards

1
Q

What is disclosure?

A

Stating to another party that a document exists or has existed. Parties will often have obligations to disclose documents that support them and that are adverse to their position.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is inspection?

A

The party to whom a document has been disclosed looking at a document.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the purposes of disclosure and inspection?

A

Help to clarify the issues that are in dispute;
Enable parties to evaluate the strength of the claim against them;
Encourage settlement;
Ensure the court has all the facts and evidence before it in order to deal justly and appropriately with the case.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How does the court arrive at a disclosure order in the small claims track?

A

Directions are given on allocation. The usual order is that at least 14 days before the date fixed for the final hearing, each party must file and serve on every other, copies of all documents on which they intend to rely at the hearing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Where does the obligation to give disclosure come from?

A

There is no automatic obligation to disclose anything - obligation comes from a court order.

Usually given on allocation or at a case management conference.

Party can also apply for order of disclosure at a later stage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How does the court arrive at a disclosure order in the fast track?

A

Court will usually give directions on allocation. Usual is to give ‘standard disclosure’, but court may order something less.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How does the court arrive at a disclosure order in the intermediate and multi-tracks?

A

More complex - parties must complete a disclosure report to be filed and served not less than 14 days before the first CMC.

Not less than 7 days before the first CMC, consider the issues in the case and enter into discussions to seek to agree a draft disclosure order which they will then ask the court to make.

At CMC court will decide what form of disclosure is most appropriate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is a disclosure report?

A

It briefly explains what relevant documents exist/may exist;
Where and with whom they are;
How any electronic docs are stored;
An estimate of broad range of costs that could be involved in giving standard disclosure in the case; and
Which of the disclosure directions are to be sought.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What happens at the CMC regarding disclosure?

A

Court uses disclosure report and any other info to consider whether standard disclosure is too expensive, considers what disclosure order to make. Can make any order relating to disclosure that it thinks is appropriate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the usual procedure for disclosure order in the small claims track?

A

Disclosure order included in directions given on allocation.

14 days before hearing, file and serve docs relying on.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the usual procedure for disclosure order in fast track?

A

Disclosure order included in directions given on allocation.

Usual order = standard disclosure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the usual procedure for disclose in multi-track?

A

Disclosure report is filed and served not less than 14 days before CMC.

Conversation between parties not less than 7 days before CMC

Court makes appropriate disclosure order - no usual order.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Generally, copies of documents need only be disclosed if…

A

They contain a modification, obliteration or other marking to feature which itself satisfies the test for standard disclosure, or the party has never had the original or no longer has it in its control.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Is there a continuing obligation of disclosure?

A

Yes - any duty continues until proceedings are concluded. Party must serve disclosure docs which come within its control or were created after the date it originally gave disclosure if they fall within disclosure obligations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the rule regarding subsequent use of disclosed documents? What are the exceptions?

A

A party to whom a document has been disclosed can only use it for the purposes of the proceedings in which it has been disclosed, not for other proceedings.

Exceptions:
- Document haș been read to or referred to by the court at a hearing in public.
-Court gives permission.
- Person who disclosed document and person to whom document belongs agree.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What does standard disclosure require?

A

Party disclose only the documents on which he relies, and the documents which adversely affect his own case, adversely affect another party’s case, or support another party’s case, and the documents which he is required to disclose by a relevant practice direction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Document can include…

A

Digital recordings, emails, photos, texts and voicemails, metadata.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Key questions to ask in standard disclosure:

A
  1. Is it a document?
  2. Is/was it in the party’s control?
  3. Does it fall within standard disclosure?
16
Q

What is a disclosure list, how is it used?

A

Standard disclosure is performed by each party making a list of docs and serving it on other party - usually simultaneously.

Three parts - I have control, you can inspect.
I have control, you cannot inspect. (can say generically e.g. correspondence between me and my solicitor rather than each individual doc).
I have had docs, they are no longer in my control.

16
Q

What does ‘in a party’s control’ mean?

A

Doc is/was in physical possession, party has/had a right to possession, party has/had a right to inspect or take copies of document.

17
Q

What constitutes a reasonable search for the purposes of standard disclosure?

A

Depends on number of docs, complexity, significance of docs. Court must take into account overriding objective and in particular the principle or proportionality.

18
Q

Where is the disclosure statement? What is it?

A

It is part of the disclosure list - sets out the extent of the search made, certifies the party knows its duty to disclose and that it has carried out that duty to the best of its knowledge.

Must be signed by the disclosing party, or an appropriate officer of the company who identifies themselves and states why they are the appropriate person.

19
Q

What is inspection?

A

A party has a right to inspect a document that has been disclosed?

19
Q

When does a party not have a right to inspect a disclosed document?

A

The document is no longer in the disclosing party’s control.

Allowing inspection would be disproportionate.

Right/duty to withhold inspection. (privilege)

20
What are the most important types of privilege?
Legal advice privilege, litigation privilege, without prejudice communications.
21
What is redaction?
Blanking out parts of a document.
22
Is redaction permitted?
Confidentiality or commercial sensitivity does not justify redaction. However, it may be possible if: There is a clear and distinct part of a document which does attract privilege, but the remainder does not. The information is totally irrelevant to the dispute. When it comes to listing redacted documents in a disclosure list, the redacted version of the document will be listed in the first part of the list of documents and will be made available for inspection with the appropriate parts covered over. The un-redacted version will be listed generically in the second part of the list of documents – inspection refused.
23
What is a waiver of privilege?
Party can allow inspection of a privileged document if it considers that the document helps its case.
24
When can there be a waiver of privilege?
Waiver of privilege in part of a wholly-privileged document will lead to waiver of privilege over the remainder of the document, unless it deals with entirely different subject matter: a party cannot ‘cherry pick’ certain parts of a privileged document to reveal to the other side/the court. Waiver of privilege in one document can lead to privilege being lost in other documents, if it would be unfair to allow the party waiving privilege not to put those documents before the court / opponent too
25
Who has the burden of proof if there is debate over whether a document is subject to privilege?
The party claiming privilege.
26
What is the procedure for inspection?
A party wishing to inspect docs must send a written notice of its wish to do so to the other side, and other side must allow inspection within seven days of receipt of the notice. Can ask for copies as well or instead with an undertaking to pay reasonable copying charges. These must be provided within seven days of receipt of the request.
27
What is legal advice privilege?
A document which is a confidential communication between a lawyer and a client and was prepared for the dominant purpose of giving or receiving legal advice. Solicitors memoranda and notes are communications for the purposes of the test, but will only be privileged if prepared in relation to confidential work undertaken for their client for the purposes of legal advice.
28
What is litigation privilege?
Document which is a confidential communication which passed between lawyer and their client or between one of them and a third party, where dominant purpose in creating doc is to obtain legal advice, evidence, or info for use in the conduct of litigation which was at the time reasonably in prospect.
29
What is a without prejudice communication?
A document whose purpose is to settle a dispute. Courts will look at substance rather than form.
30
What is the procedure for a specific disclosure application?
Application must be made by application notice, specify the order sought including listing the documents sought in a schedule to the order. The more specific list, more likely application is to succeed; and be supported by evidence.
30
Will the application for specific disclosure be successful?
(a) The court will take into account all the circumstances of the case; (b) The court will in particular take account of the overriding objective (including, for example, the proportionality and reasonableness of making an order for specific disclosure); and (c) If the court decides that the party against whom specific disclosure is sought has ‘failed adequately to comply with the obligations imposed by an order for disclosure’, the court ‘will usually make such order as is necessary to ensure that those obligations are properly complied with’.
31
What is an order for specific disclosure?
An order that a party must do one or more of: Disclose documents/classes of documents specified in the order. Carry out a search to the extent stated in order. Disclose any docs located as a result of that search. Usually order made after standard disclosure has occurred, but can be any time after proceedings have been issued.
31
What is the procedure for a non-party disclosure application?
Must be made by application notice, specify order sought including listing documents sought, be supported by evidence, require respondent to specify those docs which are no longer under their control or which they have a right to withhold from inspection.
31
When would the court make an order for pre-action disclosure?
(a) The respondent is likely to be a party to subsequent proceedings; and (b) The applicant is also likely to be a party to those proceedings; and (c) If proceedings had started, the respondent’s duty by way of standard disclosure (CPR 31.6) would extend to the documents or classes of documents which the applicant seeks (so the scope of a pre-action disclosure order cannot be wider than that of an ordinary standard disclosure order); and (d) Pre-action disclosure is desirable in order to (i) dispose fairly of the anticipated proceedings; (ii) assist the dispute to be resolved without proceedings; or (iii) save costs.
32
What are the requirements that must be fulfilled before the court will consider making an order for non-party disclosure?
The documents are likely to support the applicants case or adversely affect he case of one of the other prates to proceedings, and disclosure is necessary in order to dispose daily of the claim or to save costs.
33
What are the rules for costs with non-party disclosure?
Usual presumption is that the applicant pays costs of respondent. May be rebutted if non-party respondent has acted unreasonably in opposing the application and any previous disclosure requests.
34
What is a Norwich Pharmacal Order?
Provides a solution where court proceedings cannot be commenced because the identify of the defendant is unknown. It orders the respondent, who is not the defendant, to disclose information allowing the claimant to sue the right defendant.
35
When will court grant a Norwich Phrarmacal Order application?
Three conditions: (a) a wrong must have been carried out (or arguably carried out) by an ultimate wrongdoer (for example, a tort, breach of contract or crime); (b) there must be the need for an order to enable action to be brought against the ultimate wrongdoer (so it is unlikely an order will be obtained if the information can be obtained another way) (c) the person against whom the order is sought must (i) be more than a mere witness / bystander (they must have some greater involvement, but not necessarily any fault); and (ii) be able to (or likely be able to) provide the information necessary to enable the ultimate wrongdoer to be sued. A Norwich Pharmacal order must be necessary and proportionate in all the circumstances of the case.