Disclosure and Inspection Flashcards
What is the difference between disclosure and inspection?
Disclosure is the process by which a party tells the other that they are in possession of a document. Inspection is the process by which the other party requests to look at it.
What is the extent of the duty that parties are under to search for documents for the purposes of disclosure?
The duty is to conduct a reasonable search.
What is standard disclosure?
A party must disclose documents which they intend to rely on, regardless of whether they help or hinder their case
The standard direction in the fast track is for parties to file and serve all documents on which they intend to rely on no later than 14 days prior to the trial date.
False, this is for the small claims track
What is pre-action disclosure?
Order made by court specifying what documents that a party should disclose to another before proceedings are issued
What are the considerations when determining whether a document needs to be disclosed?
- What is a party required to disclose?
- Is the document within the party’s control?
- Does the party have the ability to prevent another party from inspecting the document?
What happens if a party no longer has physical possession of a document?
It still needs to be disclosed, but an explanation of how the document was lost must be included.
What is the only reason for a party to be able to deny inspection of a document?
When the document is privileged.
What are the three types of privilege?
- Legal Advice privilege
- Litigation privilege
- Without Prejudice privilegeha
What is the document used for disclosure?
Form N265
What is an order for specific disclosure and when should a party request it?
An order for another party to disclose specific documents. Made when a party feels the other party has not searched for a document well enough.
What is a an order for non-party disclosure?
When a party to proceedings does not have an original document, but a third party does.
A claimant is bringing an action against a defendant for breach of contract. The court orders that disclosure take place on the standard
basis.
Which of the following best describes the duty to search for documents that the parties are under?
A. The parties are under a duty to make an adequate search for all documents required under the appropriate basis for disclosure. The
extent of the search should be limited to only documents that are directly relevant to the claim.
B. The parties are under a duty to make an extensive search for all documents required under the appropriate basis for disclosure. The
extent of the search should be anything remotely related to proceedings, however minimal.
C. The parties are under a duty to make a reasonable search for all documents required under the appropriate basis for disclosure.
The extent of the search should be proportionate in line with the overriding objective.
D. The parties are under a duty to make a reasonable search for all documents required under the appropriate basis for disclosure.
The extent of the search should be anything remotely related to proceedings, however minimal.
E. The parties are under a duty to make an extensive search for all documents required under the appropriate basis for disclosure. The
extent of the search should be proportionate in line with the overriding objective.
C. The parties are under a duty to make a reasonable search for all documents required under the appropriate basis for disclosure.
The extent of the search should be proportionate in line with the overriding objective.
A company is a defendant in an action for breach of contract against them. The claimant is arguing that the defendant took the wrong
details for an order, and instead of supplying 100 brochures in fact supplied and invoiced for 1,000 brochures. Disclosure is ordered on
the standard basis as part of the directions order. During the defendant’s search for documents, they come across a written letter from
the claimant which specifies that she would like the defendant to supply 100 brochures.
Which of the following best describes the defendant’s position?
A. The defendant does not have to disclose the document as it is clearly adverse to their case.
B. The defendant must disclose the document as even though it is clearly adverse to their case, the document falls within the test for standard disclosure.
C. The defendant must disclose the document as it has been discovered as part of a reasonable search.
D. The defendant must disclose the document but can withhold inspection on the basis that the document is privileged.
E. The defendant does not have to disclose the document on the basis that the document is privileged.
B. The defendant must disclose the document as even though it is clearly adverse to their case, the document falls within the test for standard disclosure.
A claimant commences proceedings against a defendant for breach of contract. Shortly after the proceedings were issued, the
claimant’s solicitor wrote to the defendant stating that it was clearly not in any of the parties’ interests for the matter to proceed to court,
that the claimant recognised that both parties could have conducted themselves more appropriately, and that the claimant therefore
wished to negotiate. The letter included an offer to settle but was not marked ‘without prejudice’. The defendant did not accept the offer
to settle and refused to negotiate further, and so the litigation continued.
Which of the following best describes whether the claimant is entitled to withhold inspection from the defendant?
A. The claimant cannot withhold inspection. The letter was sent to the defendant and they have therefore already seen it.
B. The claimant cannot withhold inspection. It was not marked ‘without prejudice’ and therefore cannot benefit from without prejudice privilege.
C. The claimant can withhold inspection. The letter contains an offer to settle and is therefore by its very nature privileged.
D. The claimant can withhold inspection. Although the letter was not marked ‘without prejudice’, it can still benefit from being covered
by without prejudice privilege if it is clearly a genuine attempt to settle.
E. The claimant can withhold inspection. It has resulted from advice given to the claimant by his solicitor and therefore can benefit from
legal advice privilege.
D. The claimant can withhold inspection. Although the letter was not marked ‘without prejudice’, it can still benefit from being covered
by without prejudice privilege if it is clearly a genuine attempt to settle.