Disclosure Flashcards
Four jurisdictional requirements for statutory pre-action disclosure
1) Respondent likely to be a party
2) Applicant likely to be a party
3) Respondent’s duty would extend to disclosure, if proceedings had started
4) Disclosure is desirable in order to (a) dispose fairly; OR (b) assist the dispute to be resolved without litigation; OR (c) save costs
Three things for which an application for specific disclosure can be made
1) disclose documents or classes of documents
2) carry out a search
3) disclose documents following a search
Test for whether court will allow an application for specific disclosure
The court will apply the overriding objective. In particular, it will consider whether
1) the documents are relevant
2) the documents are within the party’s control
Two things a court order for pre-action disclosure MUST do
1) require the respondent to specify what documents (or classes) the respondent must disclose
2) require the respondent to specify documents that
(a) are no longer in his control OR
(b) over which he claims a right to withhold inspection
Two things a court order for pre-action disclosure MAY do
1) require the respondent to indicate what has happened to any documents which are no longer in his control
2) specify the time and place for disclosure or inspection
Two things a court order for disclosure against a non-party MUST do
1) require the respondent to specify what documents (or classes) the respondent must disclose
2) require the respondent to specify documents that
(a) are no longer in his control OR
(b) over which he claims a right to withhold inspection
Two things a court order for disclosure against a non-party MAY do
1) require the respondent to indicate what has happened to any documents which are no longer in his control
2) specify the time and place for disclosure or inspection
Test for whether court will allow an application for disclosure against a non-party
1) Whether it is likely to support the case of the applicant or adversely affect the case of another party
2) Whether disclosure is necessary in order to fairly dispose of the claim or to save costs
Main purpose of a Norwich Pharmacal order
To allow the claimant to discover the identify of an (alleged) wrongdoer
Characteristics of parties against whom a Norwich Pharmacal order may be brought
“Facilitators” - meaning they are innocently caught up in the wrongdoing.
They must be more than a mere witness.
Three requirements before a Norwich Pharmacal order can be granted
1) a wrong has been carried out (or arguably)
2) there is a need for the order, to enable the action to be brought against the wrongdoer
3) the party against whom the order is sought is
(a) a facilitator; and
(b) likely to be able to provide the information necessary
Two things the parties must do to dispense with disclosure by agreement
1) record the agreement in writing
2) lodge the agreement with the court
PD31A, para 1.4
Test for a document qualifying for public interest immunity from disclosure
Whether disclosure would be “injurious to the public interest” (Burmah Oil).
Consequence of failure to disclose a document, or refusal to allow inspection of it
Party not able to rely on it, unless the court gives permission - r.31.21
Consequence of making a false disclosure statement, without an honest belief in its truth
Contempt of court proceedings may be brought - r.31.23