Discharge Of Contract Flashcards
What is meant by discharge of contract?
Ending obligations under the contract, usually when primary obligations have been met
What case contains the strict rule on performance?
Cutter v Powell
Cutter v Powell Strict Rule
Strict/perfect rule should be complete performance of all obligations then the contract is discharged
Cutter v Powell Case
Cutter died on voyage. Failed to complete contract so no obligation to pay
Acros Ltd v E A Ronaasen & Son (Quote)
Wooden staves sixteenth of an inch narrower than asked
Lord Atkin “a ton does not mean about a ton, or a yard about a yard, if a seller wants a margin he must and in my experience does stipulate for it”
What case apples the strict rule even in an ancillary obligation?
ReMoore & Co v Landover & Co
ReMoore & Co v Landover & Co
Quantity tins where sent in different to description but total quantity correct - i strict rule applied then packaging is included in description
What dies “De minimise non curat léx” mean?
“the law does not concern itself with trifles”
Trifles - matters of no value or importance
Reardon Smith Line Ltd v Hansen-Tangen
Judge would not accept repudiation where term was mere technicality discrimination shipyard and job number
What are some exceptions to the strict rule?
- Divisible contract
- Part performance
- Substantial performance
- Prevention of performance
- Tender of performance
- Time of performance
What is meant by a divisible contract + case?
Made up of various parts that can be discharged separately
Taylor v Webb
Taylor v Webb
Contract divisible - lease premises - repair and maintain - tenant could not legitimately refuse payment
What is acceptance of part performance + case?
Shortfall of delivery or service not carried out fully - only when victim has choice of whether or not to accept
Sumpter v Hedges
Sumpter v Hedges
Builder ran out of money unable to complete work. Landowner had no choice but to complete work as otherwise would have had partially complete buildings
What is meant by Substantial Performance + case?
Party has done substantially what is required - party can recover amount appropriate to what has been done
Dakin & Co v Lee