Discharge and Remedies Breach Flashcards

1
Q

What is discharge by agreement?

A

promise/obligations fulfilled, consent by parties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Discharge by performance?

A

satisfactory-precise and exact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Comply with description- Case Law

A

Re Moore Co v Laudarer Co 1921-canned fruits
Arcos v EA Ronaasen 1933- thickness of wood

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Developments in law on description of goods- Statutes

A

S11- CRA 2015
S13/14/15/15(a)- Sale of Goods Act 1979

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

S15 A- slight breach- case law

A

Hansen-Tangen 1976- osaka vessel, physical attributes did comply with description, therefore no breach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

entire obligation- general rule

A

Cutter v Powell 1775- 30 guineas, ship journey

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Quantum-merit- what one has earned

A

yes- Hoenig v Issacs 1952- substantial performance
no- Bolton v Mohodeva 1972- lack of substantial performance / Sumpter v Hudges 1898- lump sum contracts require work to be completed entirely

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Back to precise and exact- MUST BE ON TIME

A

Startup v Macdonald 1843- although late at night
HOWEVER….

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Is time the essence?

A

Principle from United Scientific Holdings 1978- not unless specifically stated otherwise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Non-performance of Obligation due to other party- jace jace

A

Planche v Colburn 1831- publish a book (jace- jace)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

When does breach lead to termination?- 2 ways

A
  1. Legal Right- Hongkong Fir Shipping v Kawasaki 1962- when breach is of an essential term and deprived of whole benefit/ and,or the other party cannot solely perform their part of the agreement
  2. Contractual Right
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Anticipatory Breach

A

before performance is due- principle from Hochster v De la Tour 1853
applied in Frost v Knight 1871- marriage case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Principle of Legitimate Interest, example and contrast, agreed sum claims

A

White v Carter 1961- Scottish law- advertisement case, party could fulfil their part of the agreement solely and were free to do so, despite repudiation of other party
CONTRAST
The Alaska Trader- no legitimate interest to repair the ship and claim for agreed sum

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Greys v Societe Generale London Branch, principle

A

Wrongdoer should not be allowed to choose when a contract ends, at the expense of innocent party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Define stipulation

A

a condition, requirement that is demanded as part of an agreement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

define condition

A

at the heart of the transaction, if is breached injured party may terminate contract and claim damages for any loss