direct realism Flashcards
perception
processes, capacities, abilities or faculties by which we gain awareness of physical objects
realism
the view that something exists independently of the mind. realism about perception is the view that the object of perception exist independently of the mind
direct realism (naive realism)
in perception, we are directly viewing mind independent objects
perceptual variation
(argument against direct realism)
- there are variations in perception
- our perception varies without corresponding changes in the physical objects we perceive
- therefore, the properties the physical objects have and the properties they appear to have are not the same
- therefore, what we are immediately aware of in perception is not exactly the same as what exists independently of the mind
- therefore, we do not perceive physical objects directly
response to perceptual variation
- it does not follow from the fact an object does not always appear as it really is, that it is not the object itself that is appearing to us
- we often do privilege certain appearances and circumstances, showing that some appearances are presenting the object as it really is
- eg the way the table appear to me, isn’t alway the way it is; we believe the table is rectangular even though it can appear to be other shapes from different angles
- this shows that direct realists need to distinguish between relational and non relational properties
relational properties
- properties that describe how one object relates to another
- eg ollie is the tallest person in the room
non relational properties
- properties that describe how an object is in itself
- eg ollie is 6 foot 3
illusion (argument against direct realism)
- when we perceive something as having property F, there is something that is F
- in an illusion, the physical object does not have property F
- therefore, in illusions, what has property F is something mental (and mental objects are mind dependent)
- illusions can be indistinguishable from veridical perceptions
- therefore, we see the same thing in illusions and veridical perceptions
- therefore, the immediate object of perception is mental and not physical
- therefore, direct realism is fake
response to the illusion argument
- eg a straw is water appear bent but we a still perceiving the straw which is straight
- the straw (property f) has the relational property of appearing bent because of the properties of the straw and the circumstances in which we perceive it
hallucination (arguments against direct realism)
- when we perceive something as having property F, there is something that is F
- in a hallucination, we don’t perceive a physical object at all
- therefore, in a hallucination, what has property F is something mental
- hallucinations can be indistinguishable from veridical perceptions
- therefore, we see the same thing in hallucinations and veridical perceptions
- therefore, the immediate object of perception is mental and not physical
response to the hallucination argument
- relational properties can’t help to explain hallucinations as you are not standing in relation to anything physical
- disjunctivism: hallucinations and veridical experiences are two completely different kinds of mental states. one is perceiving a physical object, the other is only appearing to perceive. we can’t tell the difference between them, but the does not mean they are the same
time lag argument (argument against direct realism)
- when we perceive something as having property F, there is something that is F
- due to time lag, the physical object we are perceiving may not exist
- what are perceiving does exist
- therefore, the immediate object of perception is mental not physical
response to the time lag argument
- the direct realist can accept that we see objects as they were not as they are
- we literally see the past