Diminished Responsibility - Paper 1 Flashcards

1
Q

When will D be able to use the defence of diminished responsibility?

A

If they are suffering from a mental health issue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Which Act of Parliament sets out the 3 stage test for diminished responsibility?

A

Section 52 Coroners & Justice Act 2009

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is Stage 1 of DR?

A

D must be suffering from an abnormality of mental functioning which arose from a recognised medical condition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the definition of abnormality of mental functioning?

A

A state of mind so different from that of ordinary human beings that a reasonable person would term it abnormal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Which case defined abnormality of mental functioning?

A

Byrne

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the examples of recognised medical condition?

A

Battered Wives/Spouse Syndrome (Ahluwalia)
Epilepsy (Campbell)
Chronic Depression (Seers)
Alcohol Dependency Syndrome (Stewart/Tandy)
Schizophrenia (Kay)
Personality Disorder (Martin)
Autism (Conroy)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is Stage 2 of DR?

A

The abnormality of mental functioning must substantially impair D’s ability to do one or more of the following: understand the nature of their conduct, form a rational judgement, or exercise self-control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the decision in Golds?

A

Substantial impairment must be ‘weighty, not trivial’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is Stage 3 of DR?

A

D’s abnormality must provide an explanation for the killing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does Section 2(1)(B) Amended Homicide Act 1957 state?

A

The abnormality will provide an explanation for the killing if it was a significant contributory factor to D doing what they did

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was the decision in Dietschmann?

A

If D was suffering from an abnormality and was intoxicated at the same time the jury must ignore the drinking and consider the abnormality alone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly