Diminished responsibility Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What type of defence is this?

A
  • Partial
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Marine A

A
  • In Afghanistan him and his team came across an injured Taliban and Marine A shot him.
  • Appealed on the basis of DR
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Where did DM used to be found?

A
  • Section 2 Homicide Act 1957
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Where is the amended DM found?

A
  • Section 5(2) Coroners and Justice Act 2009
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Bernard Heginbotham

A
  • Slit his wife’s throat in an act of love

- Mercy killing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Iman Yousef

A
  • Stabbed daughter and doused her in acid

- Claimed she had heard voices to make her do this (paranoid schizophrenia)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the definition of DR under The Coroners and justice act 2009 ? (3 parts)

A

1- suffering an abnormality of mental functioning
2- Arising from a recognised medical condition which substantially impaired D’s ability to
-Understand nature of conduct
-Form a rational judgement
- Exercise self-control
3- AND provides an explanation for D’s acts and omissions in doing the killing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Brennan 2014

A
  • TJ should have removed murder charge from the jury as there was expert evidence to suggest DR existed
  • therefore he successfully appealed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Byrne 1960 (Leading case)

A
  • D killed and mutilated V in youth hostile
  • Claimed he could not control his perverted sexual urges
  • Lord parker CJ on abnormality of the mind ‘ A state of mind so different from that of ordinary human beings that the reasonable man would term it abnormal’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What did Lord Parker CJ define abnormality of the mind as?

A
  • ’ A state of mind so different from that of ordinary human beings that the reasonable man would term it abnormal’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Good thing about the amendment to abnormality of the mind to abnormality of mental functioning ?

A
  • There is no longer the need for a medical expert too prove the abnormality
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is a recognised medical condition?

A
  • Determined by the world health organisation guidance

- Can also draw upon expert medical advice to determine this

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Dowds 2012

A
  • Clarified status of world health guidance on what counts as a recognised illness
  • D killed wife when drunk and argued acute intoxication was listed in the world health organisation and therefore was an illness
  • Appeal failed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What 3 elements are included in a substantial impairment of the mental functioning?

A

1- Understand nature of his conduct
2- Form a rational judgement
3- Exercise self control

  • only one from this list is needed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Seers 1984

A
  • Defined substantial as a serious degree of impairment of mental responsibility
  • Was overruled in Golds
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Lloyd 1966

A
  • Defined substantial as anything more than trivial

- Overruled in Golds

17
Q

Golds 2016

A
  • D killed partner and had a recognised medical condition that had SOME impact on his ability to exercise self control but not serious impact
  • Current decisions on what substantial can be defined as
  • It means important or weighty
18
Q

How much of an explanation should the abnormality be for D’s conduct?

A
  • It should be a significant contributory factor

- It does not have to be the sole cause but must have contributed significantly

19
Q

Simester and sullivan 2016

A
  • Killing someone in order to satisfy a drug addiction