Diminished responsibility Flashcards

criminal law paper 1

1
Q

What are the four key elements of diminished responsibility?

A

The four elements are:
1) An abnormality of mental functioning.
2) Arising from a recognised medical condition.
3) Substantially impairing the defendant’s ability to understand the nature of their conduct, form a rational judgment, or exercise self-control.
4) Providing an explanation for the defendant’s actions in the killing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How was abnormality of mental functioning defined in R v Byrne?

A

It was defined as a state of mind so different from that of an ordinary person that a reasonable person would consider it abnormal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What were the recognised medical conditions in Hobson and in Stewart?

A

In Hobson, battered woman syndrome was recognised.
In Stewart, alcohol dependency syndrome was recognised.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the authoritative source for conditions that will be included as recognised medical conditions?

A

The authoritative source is the World Health Organization’s International Classification of Diseases (ICD).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the three things, of which one must be substantially impaired?

A

1)The ability to understand the nature of their conduct.
2) The ability to form a rational judgment.
3) The ability to exercise self-control.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What does “substantially impaired” mean after R v Golds?

A

It means the impairment must be significant or weighty, rather than trivial or minimal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Which legal concept does “the abnormality must explain the killing” refer to?

A

This refers to causation; the abnormality of mental functioning must be a significant contributing factor to the killing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does R v Dietschmann tell us about intoxication?

A

The case established that a defendant can still rely on diminished responsibility if they have a recognised medical condition that substantially impaired them, even if they were also intoxicated.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Explain one criticism of the law on diminished responsibility.

A

One criticism is that the definition of “substantial impairment” remains vague and subjective, leading to inconsistent application by juries.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the reform suggested by the Law Commission?

A

The Law Commission suggested creating a clearer statutory definition of diminished responsibility to reduce ambiguity and improve consistency in its application.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly