Differential educational Achievement (Inequality) Flashcards
What are the three types of differential education achievement?
- Class and achievement
- Gender and achievement
- Ethnicity and achievement
What are the internal factors affecting class and achievement?
- Cultural factors
- Material factors
- Cultural Capital
Define ‘cultural deprivation’.
Being deprived of cultural values which facilitate educational success.
What four elements consist of cultural deprivation?
- Language
- Parent’s education
- Parent’s attitudes and values
- Working-class subculture
How is language believed to cause differential educational achievement?
It is believed by Basil Bernstein (1975) are two codes of language.
- Restricted Code: (Working Class)
Limited vocab, grammatically simple, descriptive and context bound. - Elaborated Code: (Middle Class)
Wider vocab, grammatically complex, speech is varied and communicates abstract ideas. It’s context free.
Basil Bernstein (1975) –> recognises that working class language it restrictive but also schools teach using the elaborated code without necessarily teaching children how to use it.
How does parent’s education believed to cause differential educational achievement?
Douglas (1964) - Working class parents have less value for education, they're less ambitious for for their children and less encouraging. They are also less likely to meet with teachers and discuss their child's progress.
Feinstein (2008) - Argues parent's own education is the most important factor. Middle class parents are better educated they give their children an advantage by socialising them.
How is parenting style believed to cause differential educational achievement?
(Attitudes and values)
- Educated parents are consistent with discipline and have high expectations for their children. They support achievement by actively encourage learning/exploring.
- Working Class parents: harsh and inconsistent parenting, discipline doing “as told/behaving” which prevents children from learning independence and self control.
How are parent’s education behaviours believed to cause differential educational achievement?
(Attitudes and values)
Educated parents are more aware of what children need, as a result they encourage behaviour such as; reading, teaching their children letters, numbers, colours shapes, songs and poems, ect…
They are more successful in establishing good relationships with teachers and better at guiding their children’s reactions at school to be positive.
How is parent’s use of income believed to cause differential educational achievement?
(Attitudes and values)
Bernstein & Young (1967):
Not only do educated parents typically have higher income, they also spend it in more beneficial ways. For example, they buy educational toys, books, games and activities that stimulate reasoning and intellectual skills. They also have a better understanding of nutrition and development.
Working class children don’t experience this and therefor start school without the intellectual skills to progress.
What are the four components of working class subcultures?
Barry Sugarman (1970):
- Fatalism:
‘What ever will be will be.’ There is nothing you can do to change your fate.
- Collectivism: Valuing being part of a group more than succeeding as an individual. Contrasts with middle class who view that an individual shouldn't be held back by the group .
-Immediate Gratification: Seeking pleasure in the present rather than making sacrifices to get rewards in the future whereas the middle class emphasise deferred gratification.
-Present-time orientation:
Seeing the present as more important than the future so therefor have no long-term goals.
Evaluate whether cultural deprivation is a myth?
Nell Keddie (1973): A 'myth' that victim blames. Failure at school can't be blamed on a culturally deprived home background. Keddie argues that child cant be deprived of their own culture. He argues that children are culturally different not deprived.
Tronya & Williams (1986):
The problem isn’t children’s code of language but the attitudes towards it. They argue that teachers have a speech hierarchy.
Blackstone and Mortimore (1994): Rejects that working class parents aren't interested in their children's education and argues that instead that the reasoning for attending fewer parents evening ect if due to working longer more irregular hours not because they don't want to attend. They may want to help their children but lack the knowledge or education to do so.
What three material factors cause differential educational achievement?
- Housing
- Diet & Health
- Financial Support
How is housing believed to cause differential educational achievement?
- Overcrowding:
Less room for educational activities, no room to do homework, disturbed sleep from sharing beds/bedrooms ect..
-Temporary Accommodation:
Lack of safe space to play, moving frequently may result in constant changes of school and a disrupted education.
-Affect on health and welfare:
Cold or damp housing may cause more ill health . Families in temporary accommodation may suffer more psychological distress, infections, and accidents resulting in absence from school.
Discuss Bourdieu’s three types of capital.
Economic Capital:
- Students can pay for private tuition which leads to educational capital.
Cultural Capital: - Leads to educational capital as education is geared towards middle-class culture and students with cultural capital can use it to their advantage.
Economic Capital:
- Allows students to take part in costly ‘cultural’ activities which boosts their educational capital.
Statistics to support class and achievement deprivation.
Attainment score of 8 - 2017
Disadvantaged: 37%
Non Disadvantaged: 49.8%
Difference of: 12.8%
FSM: 35%
Non FSM: 48%
Difference of: 13%
Statistics to support gender and achievement deprivation.
Attainment score of 8 - 2017
Girls: 49%
Boys: 43.7%
Difference of: 5.3%
Attainment score of 5 A* - C - 2015
Girls: 70.9%
Boys: 59.2%
Difference of: 11.7%
(supports the idea of coursework benefiting girls, but still a gap in 2017 when coursework was cut.)
(still not as significant as the gap for class)
What four factors affect the achievement of girls?
- Feminism
- Changes in the family
- Changes in women’s employment
- Changes in girls ambitions
How did ‘feminism’ affect the achievement of girls?
Second wave feminism and the introduction of the contraceptive pill in the 60s brought on a sexual revolution, shifting the attitudes of women.
McRobbie (1994)
- Content analysis of magazines in the 70s and 90s.
1970s: focused on cleaning, good housewife ect
1990s: focused on independence, careers, aspirations ect.
Acted as a catalyst for all other factors due to bringing on a change in attitude.
How did ‘changes in the family’ affect the achievement of girls?
Divorce Reform Act 1969 - increase in divorce rates which lead to matri-focal households.
This inspires girls to either be successful and independent like their mothers or to work hard and be independent so they don’t have to struggle like their mothers.
Also decrease in marriage and increase in co-inhibiting.
How did ‘changes in employment’ affect the achievement of girls?
Equal pay act: 1970
Sex Discrimination Act: 1975 (halved pay gap 30% - 15%)
Equality Act: 2010
Legislation gave women more opportunities in employment which raised their self esteem and aspirations.
How did ‘change in girls ambitions’ affect the achievement of girls?
Sue Sharpe (1994)
- Interviewed girls in the 1970s and 1990s about their ambitions for their futures.
1970s: Girls wanted love, children, marriage ect
1990s: Girls wanted qualifications, careers, independence ect
O’Conner (2006)
- Study of gilrs aged 14-17
- Found that marriage and children were not a priority or major focus of their futures.
- BUT: working class girls haven’t shifted towards these ambitions, still value love and marriage ect, arguably due to not believing academic success is achievable.
What are the six internal factors affect the achievement of girls?
- Equal opportunities policies
- Positive role models in schools
- GCSE and coursework
- Teacher attention
- Challenging stereotypes in the curriculum
- Selection and league tables.
How did ‘equal opportunities policies’ affect the achievement of girls?
Education Reform Act, 1988:
Removed inequality/sexism in the curriculum, both boys and girls learn’t all subjects.
Programmes like GIST and WISE encouraged girls into STEM subjects as well as create more opportunities.
How did ‘positive role models in school’ affect the achievement of girls?
More female teachers and headteachers in schools act as role models for girls.
However, SLT and STEM subjects are still dominated by men.
Secondary schools:
Headteachers 1992: 22%
Headteachers 2012: 37%
–> 10 years, increase of 15% in headteacher positions
Secondary schools:
Teachers 1992: 49%
Teachers 2012: 61%
–> 10 years, increase of 12% in headteacher positions
Primary schools:
Headteachers 1992: 50%
Headteachers 2012: 71%
–> 10 years, increase of 21%
Primary schools:
Teachers 1992: 81%
Teachers 2012: 86%
–> 10 years, increase of 5%