Diastereocontrol in Acyclic systems 1 Flashcards
Describe molecular orbitals for Pi-bond
- P-orbital lobes within the antibonding pi* orbital are bent outwards
- This has stereoelectronic implication for the chemistry of the C=O bond
What are the stereoelectronic implications of the molecular orbital bending
- The lowest conformation of acetaldehyde is one in which a C-H bond eclipses the C=O group as this gives the best orbital alignment for two stabilising sigmaC-H–>pi*-O interactions
- This hyperconjugative interaction is also part of the reason that ketones are less reactive than aldehydes as there are more of these interactions to stabilise the C=O group
What is the approach trajectory of nucleophiles to C=O bonds
- Burgi-Duntz angle
- 107+-2 Degrees
Why is the Burgi-Duntz angle the approach trajectory
- Maximises bonding
- Minimises antibonding
What is the conformation of an acetaldehyde undergoing nucleophilic attack
- Not the same as its ground state lowest energy conformation
- A staggered reactive conformation is adopted
- Enables a sigma* C-H–>pi*C-O LUMO-lowering interaction which makes the C=O bond a better acceptor of electron density
- Anti periplanar relationship between nuc and C-H bond lowers LUMO
What model is used to explain addition of nucleophiles to alpha-chiral aldehydes/ketones
- Felkin-Anh model
What dictates the Felkin-Anh model
- Alpha-substituents are electronically similar but differentiated by size
- TSs are reactant like (early) rather than product-like (late)
- Reaction occurs via the most reactive conformation of the carbonyl compound (sigma* orbital perpendicular to C=O bond)
What are the rules of the FA model
- The largest group is placed perpendicular to C=O to minimise steric interaction with incoming nucleophile- lowers LUMO
- Nuc approaches at 107 degrees
- Nucleophile approaches antiperiplanar to the C-L bond to give the best stereoelectronic interaction between the sigma-donor (sigmaNu-c) and sigma acceptor (sigma*C-L)
- Nuc prefers attack alongside the smaller group S than the medium group M for steric reasons
What happens when an electronegative heteroatom substituents on the alpha-stereocentre
- For aldehydes/ketones with heteroatom (x) alpha-substituents (e.g. O,N,S,Hal) the most reactive conformation is one where the C-X bond is perpendicular to the C=O group
- C-X bonds are generally better sigma-acceptors than C-H or C-C bonds (lower energy sigma*C-X orbitals) and offer greater hyperconjugative stabilisation in the transition state
What elements have the best acceptor ability of sigma bonds
- Acceptor ability of sigma bonds increases when going to the end of a period and down the group
- Enhancement of the acceptor ability of sigma bonds within periods parallels the increase in electronegativity of X
- whereas augmentation of acceptor ability in groups is opposite to the changes in electronegativity of X and is a consequence of lowering the energy of sigma*C-X orbitals
What is the Cornforth-Evans model
- Alternative to FA model based on dipole-dipole interactions
- says most reactive conformation is one in which the C=O group and polar C-X bond are opposed in order to minimise dipole-dipole repulsion
- In simple cases will lead to same prediction as polar F-A model
What is the cram chelate model
- Chelation effects can overturn the polar FA model
- Cram chelate model used when aldehydes/ketones bear an alpha-heteroatom substituent capable of chelation to a metal ion
- Predicts the opposite diastereomer to the polar F-A model
- R group is antiperiplanar to Nu
What are common alpha-heteroatom substituent groups that result in chelation
- Almost always -OR groups
- But can occur with other lewis basic moieties (OH,SR,NR2)
- OSiR3 tend to chelate very poorly or not at all
- Mg2+, Zn2+, Cu2+, Al3+, Ce3+ Ti4+ are all excellent chelators and Li+ as have high charge densities
- Na+ and K+ are poor chelators as low charge density
Are syn and anti descriptors product or mechanism dependent
- Soft descriptors
- Depend on how the chemist chooses to define the main carbon chain
- Product not mechanism dependent `
What does the partitioning between Cram chelate and polar FA pathways depend on
- dependent on the O-protecting groups
- Also dependent on the solvent and strongly Lewis basic solvents can suppress chelation by competing for the lewis acidic metal