Diagnostics Quiz Flashcards

1
Q

what is sensitivity? What does it mean if it is high or low?

A

propotion of diseased animals that will test positive
high: you’ll be able to “catch” the diseased animals and there will be low false negatives, your positives will be more likely to be true positives
low: you’ll miss a lot of the diseased animals so you may have false negatives and you may not trust a positive result very much

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is specificity? What does it mean if it is high or low?

A

specificity is the proportion of the non diseased animals that will test negative
high: it means you’ll catch all the healthy or undiseased animals and there is a low chance of false positives
low: a lot of healthy animals will appear diseased, you’ll miss some of the healthy ones, and there is a high chance for false positives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

explain spin & snout

A

SpIN: you need a high specificity to rule IN disease because if specificity is high there is a low chance for false positives which means you can trust the positive test result
SnOUT: you need a high sensitivity to rule OUT disease because if sensitivity is high there is a low chance for false negatives which means you can trust a negative test result

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is analytic sensitivity and specificity?

A

analytic sensitivty refers to the minimum amount/concentration an assay/test can detect
analytic specificity: the ability of the assay to only react to one compound and not cross react

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

in a select point or cuttoff test, like the lactate example, what happens if you maximize sensitivity? what happens if you maximize specificity?

A

maximizing sensitivity means there will be few false negatives but there WILL be false positives, so you’ll think there’s more diseased animals than there is
maximizing specificity means there will be few false positives but there WILL be false negatives, meaning you could “miss” some of the diseased animals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is positive predicted value? what is it influenced by?

A

PPV: true positives/test positives
influenced by pretest probability and specificity (low false positives)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is negative predicted value? what is it influenced by?

A

NPV: true negatives/test negatives
influenced by pretest probability and sensitivity (low false negatives)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what happens to our faith in a positive or negative test result when the pretest probability or true prevalence increases?

A

our faith in a negative result decreases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what happens to our faith in a positive or negative test result when the pretest probability or true prevalence decreases?

A

our faith in a positive test result decreases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is a likelihood ratio of a positive test?

A

true positives/false positives , aka, how likely is this animal to be diseased if it has tested positive?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is a likelihood ratio of a negative test?

A

true negaties/false negatives , aka, how likely is this animal to be not diseased after testing negative?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

for series testing, who is considered positive? how are series tests usually done?

A

only those that are positive for ALL tests
these tests are usually done sequentially

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

for series parallel testing, who is considered positive? how are series tests usually done?

A

those who test positive for only ONE of the tests
usually done at the same time, simultaneously

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what are we trying to increase when we use series testing?

A

we are increasing diagnotic specificity because we want to reduce false positives and we want our negatives to be true negatives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what are we trying to increase when we use parallel testing?

A

increase diagnostic sensitivity because we want to reduce false negatives and we want our positives to be true positives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

if we are doing surveillence testing, what do we want to be high, and what kind of testing should we use?

A

we want a positive test to truly be positive (low false negatives), so we want a sensitive test, and we should use parallel testing (even if they test positive to one test they are considered disease positive). You’re being more cautious here

17
Q

if we are doing a confirmatory test to make a diagnosis, what do we want to be high, and what kind of testing should we use?

A

you want a negative test to truly be negative (low false positives), so we want a specific test, and we should use series testing (they are only considered disease positive if they test positive for ALL tests). You don’t want to treat a serious condition that they may not actually have.

18
Q

what is the difference between census and sampling testing? pros and cons for each?

A

census is sampling the entire population. It is expensive and not feasible. sample testing is a subgroup of the population selected to represent the entire population. It is prone to biases and errors

19
Q

if you want to detect disease prescence in a population, what information do you need to know (6 things)?

A

-populations size you are going to sample (you can figure this out with epitools based on the level of prevalence you want to be able to detect)
- the sensitivity and specificity of the test you’re using
- expected number of affected animals (approximate)
- acceptable error level of confidence level
- desired precision or decimal places
- the upper limit of sample size (how many could we ACTUALLY sample?)

20
Q

describe the difference between a type I and type II error

A

type I: concludes an association when there isn’t one (conclude a herd diseased when they arent)
type II: concludes there is no association when there is one (condlude a herd isn’t diseased when they are)

21
Q

describe the difference between random sampling, systemic random sampling, and stratified random sampling

A

random sampling: use numbers from a hat or software to randomly select a portion
systemic random sampling: selecting at an interval, like selecting every 3rd animal that comes through the chute, etc
stratified random sampling: assign srata groups then randomly select animals within those groups (age, sex, BCS, etc)

22
Q

what is herd sensitivity? what is it influenced by?

A

probability that an affected herd will yield a positive herd level test (have at least one positive). Influenced by indivudual Se and Sp, herd prevalence, and number of animals sampled

23
Q

what happens to herd sensitivity when you increase the number of animals sampled? What happens to herd sensitivity when you increase herd prevalence?

A

it increases for both (it’s easier to find a diseased animal if you sample more of them, and it’s easier to find a diseased animal if there are more diseased animals in your population to begin with)

24
Q

what is herd specificity? what is it infleunced by?

A

probability that an unaffected herd will yield a negative level test. influenced by the individual sp level and number of animals sampled

25
Q

what happens to herd specificity when you increase the number of animals sampled? what happens when you decrease the test specificity? What if there is a change in prevalence?

A

it decreases if you increase number of sampled animals (if you test more animals, chances are you’ll eventually find a diseased one) it decreases if you decrease test specificity (if your test isn’t as specific there will be more false positives) and it has NO effect on prevalence (because if they are unaffected the prevalence should be zero anyway)