DI Flashcards

1
Q

What is Validity

A

Degree measurement represents true value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is Reliability

A

Reproducibility of measurement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Subjective Outcomes

A

Likert Scales

Self-reported symptoms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Objective Outcomes –

Continuous Data

A
  • Lab values
  • BP
  • Weight
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Objective Outcomes –

Nominal Data

A
  • Death (yes/no)
  • ED admit count
  • MI
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID)

A

Amount of improvement that is important to patients

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Methods to determine MCID

A
  • Expert consensus
  • Anchor to independent categorical assessment scores
  • Distribution-based method relies on the statistical properties of the distribution of outcome
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Outcomes Important to Patients

A

Pain scales, depression scores

Delayed or reduced rates of death

Reduced hospitalizations or disease incidence

not lab valves

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is a surrogate endpoint

A

”A laboratory measurement or physical sign that is used in therapeutic trials as a substitute for a clinically meaningful end point that is a direct measure of how a patient feels, functions, or survives, and that is expected to predict the effect

of therapy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

common Surrogate

A
Osteoporosis
• BMD
Cardiovascular
• LDL cholesterol 
• LV Ejection fraction 
• Blood pressure 
• Premature ventricular 
contractions (PVCs)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Clinically Meaningful Endpoints

A
Osteoporosis
•Fractures
Cardiovascular
• CV death, MI, stroke 
• HF survival 
• CV death, MI, stroke 
• Fatal arrhythmia, sudden death
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Surrogate Endpoints Disadvantages

A
Trial too short to evaluate 
long-term side-effects
• Patients don’t relate their 
clinical experience to surrogate
• Intervention may affect 
surrogate endpoint but not clinical outcome
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Surrogate Endpoints Advantages

A

• Smaller sample size;
expose fewer patients
• Shorter trials / faster to market
• Easier to measure • Less invasive for patients

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Surrogates are justified for

A
  • Rare diseases (familial hypercholesterolemia)

* Slow developing but fatal diseases with no effective therapy (AML)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Composite Outcome Definition

A

• Combination of two or more related “component” outcomes
• Patients are
counted once if any of the
“component” outcomes occurs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Composite Outcome Disadvantages

A

• Can be misleading if the
treatment effect varies across the components and components have unequal importance
• Can be difficult to interpret

17
Q

Composite Outcome Advantages

A
• Improves statistical power 
(i.e. smaller samples)
• Allows use of multiple, 
similar outcomes (don’t 
have to choose)
18
Q

validity of composite outcomes

A

depends on similarity

in patient importance, treatment effect and incidence across the components.

19
Q

P-values

A
• Indicates precision in the 
abstract (i.e. rejecting the null). 
• Does NOT provide good 
indication of variability.
• Does NOT provide any 
indication of clinical significance.
• Less desirable
20
Q

Confidence Intervals (CI)

A
• Indicates precision in the 
abstract (i.e. rejecting the null). 
• Indicates variability (i.e. 
wideness of interval)
• Provides information 
about clinical significance
• More desirable
21
Q

Alpha (Type I) error

A

Inconsistent with other findings and wide variation

OR
• Inconsistent with other findings and close to null

22
Q

Type 2 (beta) error

A

Narrow CIs (little variation) but “touches” the null
AND Effect size within MCID
• Look for consistency with other findings

23
Q

Superiority Trial

A

New drug (e.g. Prilosec™) better than old drug (H2A) or placebo

24
Q

Non-inferiority Trial

A
New drug (e.g.  Nexium™) is no worse than old drug (e.g. Prilosec™) 
• No worse than a preset margin
25
Q

Equivalency Trial

A

New drug (e.g. generic omeprazole)
“equivalent to old drug (e.g. Prilosec™)
• No worse AND no better than a preset

margin

26
Q

delta (D)

A

clinically acceptable difference

D usually established from
pooled placebo controlled trials

• Treatments with CIs within the D are said to be “non-inferior” or “equivalent”