development of prosocial and antisocial behaviour Flashcards
define prosocial behaviour (CITE)
intentional, voluntary behaviour intended to benefit another (Eisenberg)
outline hoffman’s theory of empathy (year)
1st year of life: global empathy, no understanding of others’ feelings, just reflexes
2nd year of life: egocentric empathy. Capable of understanding that another person is distresses but attempts to help are often egocentric
early childhood: role taking skills develop and can respond less egocentrically
Global empathy example (CITE)
Dondi et al (1999) 2 day olds distressed at sounds of another infant’s cry
empathy and prosocial behaviour (CITE)
empathy plays an important role in the development of prosocial behaviour (eisenberg et al, 1983)
methods of measuring prosocial behaviour
reinforcement
induction
modeling behaviour
reinforcement (measuring prosocial behaviour)
Grusec (1991) rewards did not increase prosocial behaviour in 4 year olds
induction (measuring prosocial behaviour)
increased levels of empathy in 12-14 year olds (Krevans & Gibbs. 1996)
modeling behaviour
3 and 4 year olds were assigned to a caregiver who modelled altruistic behaviour and it was found that children can learn to be altruistic (Yarrow et al, 1973)
criticisms of studies of childrens development of prosocial behaviour
artificial and unfamiliar experiences, may involve deception.
measuring conformity rather than prosocial helpfulness
factors influencing prosocial behaviour
parental techniques
siblings
gender differences
cross-cultural differences
prosocial media
parental techniques (CITE)
Krevans & Gibbs (1996)
parents use of inductive discipline instead of power assertive was related to prosocial behaviour. children were more empathetic and therefore more prosocial
gender (CITE)
The results revealed marked gender differences in the development of prosocial behavior. For boys, levels of prosocial behavior were stable until age 14, followed by an increase until age 17, and a slight decrease thereafter. For girls, prosocial behavior increased until age 16 years and then slightly decreased. (Van der Graaf et al, 2017)
cross cultural differences
Children from Mexico, and the Philippines generally acted more prosocially than those from Japan, India, and the USA. The most prosocial children were from the most traditional society, Kenya. The most egoistic children came from the most complex modern society, the USA. Whiting and Whiting, 1975
prosocial media (CITE)
Results from 72 studies involving 243 effect sizes revealed that exposure to prosocial media was related to higher levels of prosocial behavior and empathic concern and lower levels of aggressive behavior. (COYNE ET AL, 2018)
forms of aggression
instrumental, hostile, indirect