development of prosocial and antisocial behaviour Flashcards
define prosocial behaviour (CITE)
intentional, voluntary behaviour intended to benefit another (Eisenberg)
outline hoffman’s theory of empathy (year)
1st year of life: global empathy, no understanding of others’ feelings, just reflexes
2nd year of life: egocentric empathy. Capable of understanding that another person is distresses but attempts to help are often egocentric
early childhood: role taking skills develop and can respond less egocentrically
Global empathy example (CITE)
Dondi et al (1999) 2 day olds distressed at sounds of another infant’s cry
empathy and prosocial behaviour (CITE)
empathy plays an important role in the development of prosocial behaviour (eisenberg et al, 1983)
methods of measuring prosocial behaviour
reinforcement
induction
modeling behaviour
reinforcement (measuring prosocial behaviour)
Grusec (1991) rewards did not increase prosocial behaviour in 4 year olds
induction (measuring prosocial behaviour)
increased levels of empathy in 12-14 year olds (Krevans & Gibbs. 1996)
modeling behaviour
3 and 4 year olds were assigned to a caregiver who modelled altruistic behaviour and it was found that children can learn to be altruistic (Yarrow et al, 1973)
criticisms of studies of childrens development of prosocial behaviour
artificial and unfamiliar experiences, may involve deception.
measuring conformity rather than prosocial helpfulness
factors influencing prosocial behaviour
parental techniques
siblings
gender differences
cross-cultural differences
prosocial media
parental techniques (CITE)
Krevans & Gibbs (1996)
parents use of inductive discipline instead of power assertive was related to prosocial behaviour. children were more empathetic and therefore more prosocial
gender (CITE)
The results revealed marked gender differences in the development of prosocial behavior. For boys, levels of prosocial behavior were stable until age 14, followed by an increase until age 17, and a slight decrease thereafter. For girls, prosocial behavior increased until age 16 years and then slightly decreased. (Van der Graaf et al, 2017)
cross cultural differences
Children from Mexico, and the Philippines generally acted more prosocially than those from Japan, India, and the USA. The most prosocial children were from the most traditional society, Kenya. The most egoistic children came from the most complex modern society, the USA. Whiting and Whiting, 1975
prosocial media (CITE)
Results from 72 studies involving 243 effect sizes revealed that exposure to prosocial media was related to higher levels of prosocial behavior and empathic concern and lower levels of aggressive behavior. (COYNE ET AL, 2018)
forms of aggression
instrumental, hostile, indirect
theories of aggression
freuds instinct theory (1930)
lorenz’s ethological theory (1966)
frustration-aggression hypothesis (Dollard et al, 1939)
Bandura’s social learning theory (1973)
Social learning theory
Bandura, 1973
Bobo doll study (Bandura & Ross, 1961)
observing aggressive behaviour could legitimise it whether positively or negatively reinforced
freud’s instinct theory
1930
aggression stems mainly from a powerful death wish possessed by all people
lorenz’s ethological theory
1966
aggression is ritualistic and comes frmo inherited fighting instinct
frustration-aggression hypothesis
dollard et al 1939
aggression is the result of blocking or frustrating a person’s efforts to attain a goal
factors that influence aggression
frustration
attribution bias
attention seeking
rejection
parental practice
gender
attribution bias (CITE)
hostile attribution bias (Dodge & Price, 1990)
these biases were positively correlated with undersocialised aggressive conduct disorder (as indicated by high scores on standardised scales and by psychiatric diagnoses), with reactive-aggressive behaviour, and with the number of interpersonally violent crimes committed
rejection (CITE)
(Yue, 2023)
Peer rejection was positively correlated with overall aggression
parental practice (CITE)
(Kawabata et al, 2011) Positive parenting, psychologically controlling parenting, negative/harsh parenting, and uninvolved parenting. The meta-analyses demonstrated that more positive parenting was associated with less relational aggression