development of human rights in the uk Flashcards

booklet 2

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

when was the universal declaration of human rights formally adopted and by who

A

December 1948
by the UN

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what does article 1 of the udhr state

A

‘All human beings are born free & equal in dignity & rights’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

how many articles are there and what do they set out (litch don’t deep this)

A

30 Articles in total setting out 30 fundamental human rights, available to all human beings across the world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what are 2 issues with the udhr

A

1) UDHR is not a treaty so it doesn’t create legally binding obligations on UN member states
2) Nations disagreed on types of rights to include:
USA wanted mostly political rights such as right to vote; speak freely; choice of religion; not to be unlawfully detained
Soviet Union argued human rights were all about social/economic rights such as right to work, health care, education

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

after the udhr, what was drafted by 1950

A

General Assembly of UN does not have power to make international law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what act of the ECHR established the ECtHR

A

A.19 European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is the role of the ECtHR

A

Hears applications alleging that state is in breach of ECHR provision

Individual’s case is only heard if they have used all domestic remedies

ECtHR can issue judgements as well as advisory opinions

Court’s jurisdiction is recognised by all 47 member states of Council of Europe

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

how many judges are there

A

47- 1 from each state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what are 2 of the characteristics of these judges

A

must come from high judicial office in their own country & be of high moral character
retire at age 70

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what are 3 of the rules for these judges

A

they’re elected whenever the term of a current judge expires, or when a new state subscribes to ECHR
cannot hear or decide cases if they have a family or professional relationship with any of the parties
can only be dismissed from office if other judges agree by 2/3 majority that he/she has failed to fulfil conditions of the job

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Relationship with the European Court of Justice 

A

EU institutions must respect human rights under Article 6 Treaty of Nice
all members of the EU have also signed the ECHR so the ECJ (court for EU law matters) does refer to ECtHR case law & it treats ECHR as if it’s part of EU legal system

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Relationship to National Courts

A

Most of the 47 signatories have incorporated the ECHR into national law (like the HRA with the UK) so issues are dealt with in the national courts

An individual can only take a case to the ECtHR once they have (exhausted) used all avenues and remedies in national court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what are the 3 approaches to interpretation

A

balancing of rights
proportionality
margin of appreciation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is proportionality

A

unique to human right cases

asks whether the action taken by the government was “proportionate” in the circumstances which refers to whether the action is equally balanced with the harm it was trying to prevent.

E.g. Was the government action of lockdown proportionate to preventing the harm caused by Covid?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what 3 questions should be asked when considering proportionality

A

*If anything less restrictive could have been done instead?

*Were appropriate reasons given for the actions taken?

*Were safeguards inadequate?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is the margin of appreciation

A

how much leeway states are given to limit rights

17
Q

why is the margin of appreciation needed

A

It recognises that across the 47 nations there may be differing ideas in terms of priorities and cultural values

Therefore the ECtHR will give each nation some flexibility to interpret rights in a different way

The margin will vary from right to right, depending on the importance attached to the absolute protection of a right

18
Q

what is a wide margin

A

states allowed more flexibility to limit rights. This is more likely to be the approach given for articles where there is no European consensus on an issue, or where national security is involved

19
Q

what is a narrow margin

A

less flexibility to limit rights. This is used when there is a European consensus on the issue so there is no need to allow countries differing levels of freedom

20
Q

What happened in the case of Otto-Preminger Institute v Austria (1994)?

A

Austria banned a film which included erotic scenes between religious figures

The ban was allowed because the court accepted the religious nature of Austria as a country

In a more secular nation the ban may have been overruled