Determining Terms Flashcards

1
Q

UCC Risk of Loss - 3rd Party Carrier

A

Under the UCC, the risk of loss generally passes to the buyer when the buyer receives the goods.

But if the contract requires the seller to deliver the goods by third-party carrier, then the risk of loss passes to the buyer at different times depending on whether the contract is a:

  • shipment contract – does not require delivery at a particular location, so the risk of loss passes to the buyer when the goods are properly delivered to the carrier or
  • destination contract – requires delivery at a particular location, so the risk of loss passes to the buyer when goods are delivered at the named location.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Destination Ks

A

Destination contracts are often identified by the letters “F.O.B.” (free on board) followed by a location.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is a release?

A

A release is a writing that manifests an intent to discharge another party from an existing duty.

The UCC requires the release to be signed by the releasing party, but new consideration is not required for the release to be effective.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

PER bars evidence of:

Exceptions?

A
  • Evidence that is extrinsic to a written K is inadmissible to supplement or contradict K
  • Negotiations and agreements before K becomes integrated

Exceptions: EE may be allowed if either:

  1. K was only partially integrated; OR
  2. Additional terms would ordinarily be in a separate agreement.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

PER Exceptions: allows evidence of:

A

1) Mistake in the process of reducing an agreement to writing
2) Misrepresentation, fraud, duress, or illegality
3) Unconscionability (i.e., K involves some element of unfair surprise)
3) Condition precedent to agreement becoming effective
4) Modifications (oral or written) made after the writing
5) Meaning parties intended to give particular terms in the writing
6) UCC: a written K’s terms may be explained or supplements by evidence of a course of dealing, performance, or trade usage (can be used to show parties’ customs take precedence over an industry’s customs of trade)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

PER - UCC Partially integrated K

A

The UCC presumes that a written contract is partially integrated. As a result, evidence that supplements the written contract is admissible—but evidence that contradicts the writing is inadmissible—under the parol evidence rule.

Example: A written agreement between the jeweler and the goldsmith is partially integrated because it represents the parties’ final agreement for the sale of a ring—including the price, size, and type of gold. This writing expressly stated that the ring would be chosen only from the white gold ring designs. The goldsmith’s prior oral statement that he would also include rose gold ring designs contradicts the writing, so the court should not admit this evidence
In contrast, the writing made no mention of earrings. This means that the goldsmith’s prior oral statement to include a set of earring settings merely supplements the writing and is not barred by the parol evidence rule. As a result, the court should admit the evidence as to the earring settings.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Title and Good Faith Purchasers - Buyer in the ordinary course

A

A merchant entrusted with goods has the power to convey good title to a buyer in the ordinary course.

A buyer in the ordinary course is someone who buys goods:

(1) in good faith,
(2) without knowledge that the sale violates the owner’s rights to the goods, AND
(3) from a merchant in the business of selling goods of that kind.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

PER - UCC - Trade Usage

A

Regular practice or method of dealing in that particular business/industry

Under the UCC, a party may explain or supplement the terms of a written contract with evidence of trade usage—i.e., any practice or method of dealing in the particular business or industry that is observed with such regularity so as to justify an expectation that it will be observed in the instant case.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

PER - UCC - Course of Performance

A

Evidence of COP is admissible. Under the UCC parol evidence rule, course of performance can be used to supplement or explain the terms of a final written agreement.

COP = Sequence of conduct under contract involving repeated occasions for performance.

Course of performance > course of dealing & trade usage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

PER - UCC - Course of Dealing

A

Admissible

Sequence of conduct pertaining to previous contracts.

Course of dealing > trade usage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

PER - Evidence of Condition Precedent

A

Evidence used to establish a condition precedent that must occur before a contract becomes effective is admissible under an exception to the parol evidence rule.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Implied Warranty of Merchantability

A

The implied warranty of merchantability warrants that the goods sold are fit for their ordinary purpose, but this warranty is implied only when the seller is a merchant with respect to the goods sold.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Under the UCC, is a K presumed to be partially integrated or totally integrated?

A

Partially integrated.

However, that presumption goes away when the writing contains a merger clause—i.e., a clause that declares the written contract to be the complete and final agreement between the parties. The written contract will instead be deemed completely integrated.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

A written K is completely integrated if it contains a _______________.

A

A written contract is completely integrated if it contains a merger clause—i.e., a clause that declares the written contract to be the complete and final agreement between the parties.

As a result, the parol evidence rule bars the admission of prior or contemporaneous agreements that modify or contradict the terms of the writing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Installment K - UCC

A

Under the UCC, an installment contract is defined as a contract in which the goods are to be delivered in multiple shipments, and each shipment is to be separately accepted by the buyer.

Payment by the buyer is due upon each delivery unless the price cannot be apportioned.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

When is payment due under an installment K if the K does not specify?

A

Deliveries

  • Price for each installment generally due at time & place of each delivery
  • Seller’s damages for breach amount to missed payments
  • Buyer’s damages for breach amount to fair market value minus contract price for missed deliveries

Payments

  • Creditor’s damages for breach amount to missed payments
17
Q

Does the PER bar evidence of prior or contemporaneous communications between contracting parties when the evidence is offered to establish a defense to contract formation?

A

NO. The parol evidence rule does not bar evidence of prior or contemporaneous communications between contracting parties when the evidence is offered to establish a defense to contract formation (e.g., misrepresentation).

18
Q

Exceptions to the PER

A

Exceptions to parol evidence rule

Evidence of prior or contemporaneous oral or written agreement is admissible to establish:

  • whether writing is integrated and, if so, completely or partially
  • meaning of ambiguous term
  • defense to formation or enforcement (eg, fraud, duress, mistake)
  • ground for granting or denying remedy (eg, rescission, reformation)
  • subsequent contract modifications
  • condition precedent to effectiveness
19
Q

UCC - Presumption of partially integrated agreement

A

Under the UCC, a court should presume that a written contract for the sale of goods is only partially integrated. As a result, evidence of additional consistent terms is admissible unless the court concludes that the parties certainly would have included those terms in the writing.

20
Q

Integration

A

Complete integration

  • Writing that sets forth parties’ final agreement about all terms

Effect

  • Excludes parol evidence within scope of agreement
  • Parol evidence inadmissible to supplement (ie, add to) or contradict contract

Partial integration

  • Writing that sets forth parties’ final agreement about some terms

Effect

  • Excludes parol evidence inconsistent with agreement
  • Parol evidence admissible to supplement (not contradict) contract
21
Q

Buyer’s duty of good faith & fair dealing under requirements contract

A
  • Buyer must purchase goods in question from seller only
  • Requirements must approximate reasonably foreseeable figure
  • Reasonable elasticity in requirements permitted (so long as any variations are in good faith)
22
Q

A K is divisible if:

A
  • the parties’ duties can be broken down into at least two corresponding pairs of performances and
  • those pairs of performances can fairly be regarded as agreed (i.e., bargained-for) equivalents.

Courts prefer to interpret contracts as divisible for reasons having to do with fairness. However, courts will not do so if the contract expressly states that it is indivisible or payment is due upon completion of the entire contract.

23
Q

Under a UCC contract, if the buyer, before entering into the contract, has examined the goods as fully as the buyer desires, or has refused to examine the goods, is there any implied warranty with respect to defects that an examination would have revealed to the buyer?

A

NO. There is no implied warranty with respect to defects that an examination would have revealed to the buyer.

If a Buyer refuses to examine the goods, he waives any implied warranty of merchantability that would have otherwise attached to the sale.

24
Q

Employment contracts Duration and Termination

A

1) Definite duration
* Termination allowed only for cause or by mutual agreement
2) Indefinite duration / Permanent Duration

  • At-will employment can be terminated by either party at any time & for any reason
    • Exception: termination violates public policy
25
Q

What is the courts main concern in an declaratory judgment action between contracting parties?

A

This action for declaratory judgment asks the court to define the contracting parties’ rights and obligations under their agreement.

The court’s main concern is to give effect to the parties’ outward expressions of intent, so the court will interpret the contract according to its plain (ie, ordinary) meaning whenever possible.

Accordingly, if the contract’s language is clear and unambiguous, the court will stop its interpretive process with that language.*

*The court may go outside the four corners of the document to clarify the meaning of terms that are ambiguous (ie, subject to more than one reasonable interpretation) or overly vague (ie, imprecise).