DESTINATION OVER Flashcards

1
Q

two species of destination

A
  1. TO A whom failing B- A= institute BORIS is either- CONDITIONAL INSTITUTE or SUBSTITUTE
  2. survivorship (to Aand B between them and the SURVIOR)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Paxton trs v cowie

A

ACCRETION. to A and B pressumped to mean to A and B and the survivor unless the WORDS OF SEVRENCE USED. to A and B EQUALLY between them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

frasers trs

A

Accretion. in the class of legacies accretion applied notwithstanding words of severance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

suc scot act 2016 s.6(2)

A

where a direct descentdant of a deceased legatee dies pre legatee vests. the decendants issue alive at the time are entitled to ben of the legacy. UNLESS IT IS CLEAR THE TSTATOR INTENDED OTHERWISE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

s. 6(3) and 6(2) suc scot act

A

conflicts between destinations over
express destination over prevail over any implied
6(3)- states conclusively that the testator intended otherwise than the decendent inheriting
accourding to 6(2) IF THE LEGACY
1. is to the deceased legatee and to the survivor of them
2. is to the deceased legatee whom failing another person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

s.5 and 11 1964

A

s.6 1964 equivolant of rep in legitim and free estate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

vesting

A

legal rights, prior rights s. 2 intestate succession unconditional legacies take affect almost immediately on death of DE CUJUS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Ademption

A

testatator gifts specific property when dies. but this property is no longer in their estate the gift = void

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

cobbans exs

A

ADEMPTION. it is settled, for the better or worse, that ademption is a q of fact and NOT of Intention

they DONT OWN IT THUS NO LEGACY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

ogavillie - forbes

A

ADEMPTION land transferred by company as sole shareholder of the land to the company.
CANNOT BE THE OWNER OF TRANSFERED LAND

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

tenant trs

A

ADEMPTION tenant inchoate sale transfer. transfer must be reg with company. transfer had begun had the property. PROPERTY NOT ADEEMED STILL IN ESTATE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

meeres dowels ex

A

LEGITIM REI ALIENAE.
ex instruction that it should be purchased if they knew they were not the owner and could prove intention that they would like the exec to purchase IT CAN BE VALID

if the testator believed the thing belonged to them by usuage OR bequesthing it the ben could not just claim its value IT IS NOT PART OF ESTATE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

anti ademption clause

A

or such house I own at the time of death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

death of legatee

A

lapse

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

EXPRESS DESTINATION OVERS

A

go beyond the testator survivorship clause.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

croziers trustee v Underwood

A

EXPRESS DESTINATION OVERS the term “their” was an express residuary legacy.

17
Q

Erskine 111

A

a legacy is valid though there should be an error in the name of the legatee provided his description id him sufficiently above allnothers

18
Q

cathcarts trs v bruce

A

the court determined her intent as to who she meant using a letter she wrote to ex where she referred to two young men. thus making it only possible that it was the boys of GEN james bruce

19
Q

nasmyths trs v NSPCC

A

whilst probs meant the Scottish charity cannot go beyond clear words used her. clearly wasn’t proven

20
Q

couper v valentine

A

my wife mrs X. My WIFE A CONDITION? HELD no whilst not wife she was still clearly id 2016 act legacy to divorce spouse change this

21
Q

orminston ex v laws

A

my fiancé mrs s. WAS BNEVER FIANCE.
had married someone else
BUT she was clearly ID so could claim

22
Q

class legacy

A
gives legacy to T's children. so its a class of people.
identification of legatees
23
Q

bequest to charity

A

Interpretation of: ID of legatees. if charity does not exist

24
Q

Abatement

A

estate inadequate because of groos estate OR

groos estate big enough but net estate too smallPECUNIARY LEGACIES ABATE BEFORE SPECIAL

25
Q

WHAT ORDER DO LEGAVIES ABATE

A

gen legacies ( money ect)
residuary ( I will leave whats left to)
universial (a legacy that discpenses of entire estate)

26
Q

j CHALMERS

A

LEGACIES may be conditional but not all contions are valid

27
Q

demonstrative legacies

A

reid trs v dawson