Descriptive theories of rationality Flashcards

1
Q

<p>Expected value theory</p>

A

<p>Your long-run “average”

What is to be expected if you choose an option an infinite number of times

EV = p(occurring) * (potential outcome) + p (not occurring) * (potential outcome)
</p>

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

<p>Saint Petersburg Paradox</p>

A

<p>EV (game) = .5(2.00) + .25(4.00) +
.125(8.0) ….

= 1.00 + 1.00 + 1.00..
= INFINITE AMOUNT OF MONEY
</p>

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

<p>

| Fechner&rsquo;s Law</p>

A
<p>
	Psychological intensity is a logarithmic f(n) of physical intensity Just noticeable differences</p>
<p>
	 </p>
<p>
	 </p>
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Utility Curve implies _____ ______

A

risk aversion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Concave Utility function: Gamble 1: What do you prefer
A: $100
B. .5 ($200)
.5 (0)
Concave utility function explains ____ _______

A

A: $100

Risk aversion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Expected Utility Theory is a _________ theory of behavior that does not explain ____?______; but how people….

A

Normative theory of behavior

Does not explain how people behave

how they SHOULD behave if they followed certain requirements of rational decision making

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the six principles of the expected utility theory?

A
principle 1: Ordering 
principle 2: Dominance 
Principle 3: Cancellation 
principle 4: Transitivity (EU Axiom)
principle 5: Independence 
Principle 6: Invariance (distribution of probabilities across alternatives)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Principle 1 of the EU:

Ordering

A

Principle 1: Ordering

Rational decision-makers should be able to compare alternatives

comparability Axiom of EU

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Principle 2 of the EU:

Dominance

A

Principle 2: Dominance

Car A is $ 15,000 and gets 35 MPG
Car B is $20,000 and gets 28 MPG

A = much better (it dominates) B

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Principle 3 of the EU:

Cancellation

A

Principle 3: Cancellation

Decisions are made by comparing differences.

Similarities cancel out

Independence Axiom (EU)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Principle 4 of the EU:

Transitivity (EU Axiom)

A

Principle 4: Transitivity (EU Axiom)

If A > B and B > C, then A > C

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Principle 5 of the EU:

Independence

A

Principle 5: Independence

The preference between two option must not be affected by a third outcome that is equal to both options)

pertains to well-defined preferences and assumes that two gambles mixed with a third one maintain the same preference order as when the two are presented independently of the third one

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Principle 6 of the EU:

Invariance (Distribution of probabilities across alternatives)

A

Principle 6: Invariance (Distribution of probabilities across alternatives)

A decision maker should not be affected by the way that the alternatives are presented

Ex) Choose between:
A two-stage lottery that pays out $100 if you win both stages (p= .50 to win at each stage), OR
25% chance to win $100 in a once-and-done lottery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Define: Axiom

A

a statement or proposition that is regarded as being established, accepted, or self-evidently true.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Expected Utility Theory Axioms:

EU established explicit axioms that underlie _______ _______ _______

When axioms are satisfied, a ________ ________ can be associated with each consequence.

A

Rational decision-making

Numerical measurement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Name three examples of Paradoxes in Rationality:
1)
2)
3)

A

1) Loss Aversion
2) Allais Paradox
3) Ellsberg Paradox

17
Q

Paradoxes in Rationality: Loss Aversion

A

Gamble 1: flip a coin: head: $10; tail: $0 vs. $5 for sure

Gamble 2: flip a coin: head: -$10; tail: $0 vs. -$5 for sure

Gamble 3: you are given $10, then play Gamble 2, people flip a coin

18
Q

Paradoxes in Rationality: Allais Paradox

A

Demonstrates the Independence Axiom

19
Q

Paradoxes in Rationality: Ellsberg Paradox

A

It is generally taken to be evidence for ambiguity aversion