Description Of Goods

Question 1

Beale v Taylor

-S13 SGA

Answer 1

T put an advert for a car in the newspaper and described as ‘Herald converatble’
However this was a cut and shut
Didn’t conform to the description

Question 2

Harrlington and Leinster Enterprises Ltd c Christopher Hull Fine art Ltd

S13

Answer 2

Sale of a painting described as being by the famous German artist munter
The painting was a fake
The buyer was a dealer in German art and as such an expert- there was no reliance on the seller and therefore no breach of S13

Question 3

Ashongton Piggeries Ltd v Hill

Answer 3

Feedstuff was sold to a mink breeder and the feedstuff killed many of his mink as it contained a substance toxic to them
Whilst this may have been a breach in other regards no breach of S13 as it was still feedstuff

Question 4

Border Harvesters ltd v Edwards engineering ltd

Answer 4

Described a certain type of grain dryer which if was although it did not achieve the stated capacity which it said it would- this was however not a S13 issue