Describe the optimal nutritional strategy for recovery from prolonged exercise and discuss how recovery duration would influence your recommendations. Flashcards
Is nutritional strategy during recovery more vital during short term (<8 hours) or long term recovery?
Short term
Describe the nature of glycogen repletion
> Biphasic (fast then slow phase).
Proglycogen stored first, then macroglycogen.
Auto-regulated process, where glycogen stores determine the rate of repletion/storage.
How does delayed (2 hour) feeding impact muscle glycogen repletion vs immediate CHO feeding in the short term (2 hrs) and long term (8hrs)?
- What’s the reference for this?
- Betts & Williams (2007)
More rapid rate of muscle glycogen recovery w/ immediate feeding.
Much higher muscle glycogen after 2 hours w/ immediate feeding. No differences after 8 hours. (also shown in Parkin et al, 1997)
Why does immediate CHO feeding result in higher rate of glycogen repletion in early stages vs. delayed feeding?
Muscle is very responsive to insulin post-exercise and delaying feeding leads to rapid reversal in exercise-induced increases in glucose uptake.
Describe the role of insulin in muscle glycogen repletion
hint: there are 4
> Stimulates translocation of GLUT4 from storage vesicle to plasma membrane, more GLUT4 on membrane to take up glucose.
Helps keep GLUT4 on membrane
Increases intrinsic activity of GLUT4 on membrane
Stimulates glycogen synthase, which converts G-6-P (product of incoming glucose) into muscle glycogen
What timing recommendations would you give for post-exercise CHO intake when recovery period is short (e.g. comp day or multiple training sessions)?
- Give reference(s) to back up your point.
Important to ingest CHO asap post-exercise when recovery period is short as muscle is most responsive to insulin and therefore rate of muscle glycogen storage is higher.
Feeding little and often to keep insulin levels high and GLUT4 transporters on muscle membrane.
- Betts & Williams (2007)
- Ivy et al (1998)
What timing recommendations would you give for post-exercise CHO intake when recovery period is long (e.g. the next day)?
Not necessary to ingest CHO immediately post-exercise.
Personal preference can be taken into account without major detriment to recovery.
This applies to both timing and type.
- Betts & Williams (2007)
How may frequency of CHO intake post-exercise affect subsequent performance?
- Give a reference.
More frequent CHO ingestion during 4 hour recovery period may increase reliance upon CHO oxidation in following bout, however, no detriment to TTE in a run.
- Siu et al (2004)
Describe the study methods and results of Blom et al (1987).
Cycle to exhaustion followed by 6 hr recovery with ingestion of GLU, SUC or FRU.
Glu + Suc had faster muscle glycogen synthesis than fru. Fru better for liver glycogen, therefore, ingest sucrose for muscle and liver glycogen repletion.
Glu faster than Fru because higher GI.
How may a CHO’s GI impact recovery of muscle glycogen post-exercise?
- Give a reference
- Kiens et al (1990)
Prolonged cycle followed by 6 hours recovery ingesting either LO or HI GI CHO.
HI GI had sig higher glycogen synthesis after 6 hours, but no difference at 14 hours.
How may GI of CHO ingested prior to exercise impact performance?
- Give a reference
- Wu & Williams (2006)
Low GI CHO ingested 3 hours prior to TTE run at 70% VO2 max resulted in greater TTE and fat oxidation than high GI meal.
Describe your recommendations for GI of CHO ingested between a short and long recovery period.
Short term (<6-8 hours) it's important to have GI carbs to maximise glycogen synthesis. Longer term it doesn't matter much. Moderate recovery periods it may be useful to have high GI first to maximise glycogen repletion and then low GI ~3 hours prior to repeat performance to increase fat oxidation and performance (Wu & Williams, 2006).
How does glycogen repletion post-exercise differ with varying CHO forms (liquid vs. solid) ingested?
- Give a reference and describe the study
- Reed et al (1989)
Prolonged cycle followed by 4 hour recovery ingesting either liquid or solid CHO.
No sig differences between the two in terms of muscle glycogen repletion.
Describe the limitation to Reed et al’s 1989 study into how CHO type effects muscle glycogen repletion and give the real world implications of this.
CHO dosages were relatively tame compared w/ modern standards (0.75 g/kg/h).
Higher dosages may mean liquid could be taken in easier and better tolerated in the gut than solid.
Also liquid gives added benefit of hydration.
Why is it difficult to ascertain the smallest amount of CHO needed to maximise rate of muscle glycogen storage?
Confounding influence of other factors (e.g. type and timing of CHO ingestion).