Descartes (test 1) Flashcards
in the first meditation Descartes attacks a (then) widely held view about the foundation for sciential. what is the view he attacks?
- he is attacking the view that sense perception is a foundation for knowledge
- attacks the view that we gain knowledge from our senses
- attacks the idea of sense perception as a foundation for certainty
according to Descartes what does it mean to say that something is metaphysically certain?
something is metaphysically certain if there are no conceivable situations in which it could turn out to be false. there are no internal contradictions or inconsistencies.
state Descartes method of doubt
Descartes doubts everything that is not metaphysically certain. if it is not metaphysically certain than it can be doubted.
- if something is doubted it is ultimately not true/certain.
- if something is doubted one ought to refrain from believing it
give 2 conclusions from the wax example
- descartes uses the wax example to illustrate how some things/concepts of things are extended (like the concept of space)
- descartes refers to its change in space/form once it melts. it takes on a different perceptual form but it is still technically the same substance
- 1st conclusion- one cannot know about the nature of a substance or entity by means of the senses
- 2nd conclusion- one can only know about the nature of things through means of the intellect/mind
state the cogito
I think therefore I am
why is the cogito crucial for descartes argument
it is the first thing that descartes establishes to be true (metaphysically certain) and serves as the basis for the rest of his arguments
why is the cogito better for descartes than the ambulo
there is no way to doubt your own existence if it is based on thinking. you can’t deny your own thoughts but you can deny that you are walking.
descartes truth rule
everything that is clear and distinct id true
how does descartes use the cogito to establish the truth rule
- it is only in virtue of a clear and distinct perception that I have metaphysical certainty of my existence as a thinking being
- the cogito is the first thing that he finds to be metaphysically certain and clear and distinct
- therefore, if he finds other things that are clear and distinct they can be proven to be metaphysically certain
what are the 2 substantive premises of the dream argument
- there are no sure signs at t to distinguish being awake at t from being asleep and dreaming at t
- the perceptions I have while dreaming are not reliable indicators of the way things are, let alone metaphysically certain