Depression Part 2 Flashcards
What is Contemporary Integrative Interpersonal Theory (CIIT)?
CIIT is a framework for understanding personality and psychopathology through recurring interpersonal dynamics and interactions, emphasizing agency (dominance–submission) and communion (warmth–aloofness) as core dimensions.
What are the six core assumptions of CIIT?
- Personality and psychopathology are expressed through interpersonal situations.
- Agency (dominance–submission) and communion (warmth–aloofness) organize interpersonal functioning.
- These dimensions apply across levels of experience (traits, behaviors, motives).
- Interpersonal behavior is driven by satisfying agentic and communal motives.
- The interpersonal transaction cycle predicts patterns of interaction.
- Persistent deviations from expected patterns indicate psychopathology.
What is the Interpersonal Circumplex (IPC) in CIIT?
The IPC organizes interpersonal behaviors along two axes:
* Agency: Dominance vs. submission.
* Communion: Warmth vs. aloofness.
It describes and predicts interpersonal patterns central to psychological distress.
What is the interpersonal transaction cycle in CIIT?
Dominant behaviors elicit submissive responses, and warm behaviors elicit warmth in return (complementarity).
Persistent disruptions in these patterns often signal psychopathology.
How does CIIT define the interpersonal situation?
An interpersonal situation involves the interaction of the self with others, either directly or as internalized representations, affecting agentic and communal motives, anxiety/security, and learning.
Pincus and Ansell (2003): “A pattern of relating self with others, associated with varying levels of anxiety/security, influencing self-concept and social behavior.”
How is CIIT applied in psychotherapy?
Noncomplementary responding:
* Disrupt maladaptive interpersonal cycles (e.g., responding to hostility with curiosity).
Therapeutic metacommunication:
* Openly discussing interpersonal dynamics to foster insight and behavioral change.
How do interpersonal styles affect therapeutic outcomes?
Warm and submissive styles: Stronger alliances, faster improvement, and better long-term outcomes.
Hostile and dominant styles: Greater challenges in forming alliances and sustaining treatment progress.
How are interpersonal styles linked to diagnoses?
Hostile-dominant styles: Common in antisocial personality disorder.
Submissive styles: Linked to major depression, often with chronic symptoms
What evidence supports CIIT’s interpersonal processes?
Pathological narcissism: Anger in response to perceived dominance.
Borderline personality disorder: Hostility in response to perceived coldness.
Complementary patterns (e.g., warmth eliciting warmth) predict stronger therapeutic alliances and outcomes.
What are the therapeutic goals of CIIT?
Identify and disrupt maladaptive interpersonal cycles.
Foster new social learning through noncomplementary responses.
Generalize insights to broader relationships, promoting healthier patterns.
What is the focus of Cuijpers et al. (2016)?
The study reports the effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) for treating Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and other anxiety-related disorders, emphasizing MDD.
Why are the effects of CBT often overestimated?
- Publication bias: Favoring studies with stronger findings.
- Low-quality trials: Limited rigorous evidence.
- Use of waiting list control groups:
- Waiting lists may create nocebo effects, worsening symptoms due to negative expectations.
How does the choice of control group affect CBT outcomes?
Studies using waiting list controls show larger effect sizes than those using:
* Care as usual (conservative controls).
* Pill placebo.
Waiting list control groups amplify apparent CBT effectiveness due to nocebo effects in controls.
What are the conclusions about CBT for MDD?
- CBT is “probably effective” for MDD, GAD, PAD, and SAD.
- Effectiveness is greater in studies with waiting list controls.
- Small number of high-quality studies limits certainty of effects.
What was the aim of Undurraga et al. (2017)?
To compare the effectiveness of tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in treating Major Depressive Disorder (MDD).
What were the hypotheses of the study?
- Minimal differences between TCA and SSRI efficacy.
- Trial improvements (e.g., larger participant numbers, longer duration) would not significantly alter efficacy ratings but might show differences in dropout rates.
What were the key results of the comparison between TCAs and SSRIs?
- Efficacy:
- No significant difference in short-term efficacy.
- Similar depression rating improvements for both drugs.
- Dropout rates:
- Higher dropout rates with TCAs compared to SSRIs.
- SSRIs had better overall tolerability.
What factors were unrelated to treatment responses?
- Trial size.
- Proportion of women participants.
- Mean drug dose.
- Initial depression ratings.
What are the overall conclusions from Undurraga et al. (2017)?
TCAs and SSRIs are similarly effective for treating MDD.
SSRIs are better tolerated, with fewer dropouts.
Larger, longer trials reinforce these findings without altering efficacy ratings.
What are common factors in psychotherapy?
Common factors are elements shared across all therapies, such as:
1. Therapeutic alliance (relationship between therapist and patient).
2. Patient’s understanding of their problem and potential solutions.
3. Credibility of the treatment.
What was Rosenzweig’s Dodo Bird Verdict (1936)?
Rosenzweig suggested that all therapies are equally effective, sparking ongoing debate about whether differences in therapeutic outcomes are due to specific techniques or common factors.
What are Jerome Frank’s four common factors of psychotherapy?
- A functional relationship between therapist and patient.
- A credible explanation for the treatment.
- Specific procedures presented in an organized way.
- A therapeutic environment conducive to healing.
What is the contextual model of psychotherapy?
The most developed common factors model, emphasizing:
1. Real relationship: Authentic connection between therapist and patient.
2. Expectations/hope: Therapy instills hope and provides tools for change.
3. Specific therapeutic elements: These activate expectations and produce tangible benefits (e.g., improved social skills in interpersonal therapy).
How do common factors contribute to therapy outcomes?
- 30% of change is due to common factors.
- 15% is attributed to specific therapeutic techniques.