Deontological Ethics Flashcards
Outline Deontological Ethics
- Concerned with actions that are right or wrong in themselves
- Moral actions should be performed for their own sake
- ‘Deontology’ = Greek for “obligation”
- Hypothetical Imperative presents something to gain
- Catagorical Imperatives are moral, and do not depend on our preferences or desires
- Only humans are moral as we have free-will
- Maxims are underlying principles for our actions and should be derived from reason alone
- 1st Formulation: our maxims should be universalisable
- 2nd Formulation: others should be treated as ends in themselves
Outline the “Consequences of actions determine their moral value” criticism of Deontological Ethics (and reply)
Kant insists that consequences do not matter from a moral point of view. But SURELY consequences are a factor e.g. telling a lie to save a life - this should be seen as moral, but a lie wouldn’t align with Kant’s formulation
Reply: the murderer (from the example) would be immoral
Outline the “Problems with the application of the principle” criticism of Deontological Ethics (and reply)
-Maxims are always moral if the action could be consistently performed by anyone in a similar situation with the same reasons
-e.g. the maxim “Kill all the Jews” would comply
-Kant’s theory is too easy to satisfy
Reply: (2nd Formulation) The Nazis were aiming to produce a master race
Outline the “The value of certain motives and commitments” criticism of Deontological Ethics (and reply)
-Visiting a friend out of desire would have no moral worth
-However, visiting a friend out of duty/reason would be moral, according to Kant
-The theory removes us as emotional beings
Reply: Duty is misunderstood. Duty is not external but rather derived from judgement. Visiting a friend without the emotional component would be immoral. The flaw isn’t that actions are done from duty, but rather: having the rationale to understand the relevant duty determines morality.
Outline the “Conflicts of duty” criticism of Deontological Ethics (and reply)
What if we have to steal in order to keep a promise? ‘Keeping Promises’ and ‘Not Stealing’ are logical maxims or ‘perfect duties’ - which allow no exception
Reply: A collision of duties/obligations is inconceivable (in this case, the promise should not have been made)
Outline the “Too strict” criticism of Deontological Ethics (and reply)
Lying may be beneficial, but Kant’s theory is too rigid and allows for no exception
Reply: Universal principles need not be so specific, rather it should allow for differentiation on according to what is specific
List the 5 criticisms of Deontological Ethics
- Consequences of actions determine their moral value
- Problems with the application of the principle
- The value of certain motives and commitments
- Duty is misunderstood
- Too strict