Deontological Ethics Flashcards
Finnis book (1980)
Natural law and natural rights, which sets out a philosophical of law (jurisprudence) in which he argues that the basic functions of the legal system should be to promote the basic goods for all citizens.
Natural law theory
Aristotle was an early proponent that there was a natural justice, which was valid to everyone.
However, Natural Law theory was fundamentally developed by Aquinas (1225). Aquinas claimed Natural Law was an aspect of God’s eternal law, accessed through human, God given, rationality i.e. humans can reason that the purpose of life is to re-establish a right relationship with God.
Finnis natural law response
Finnis accepts the idea that there is a natural justice, that is applicable to all humanity. However, unlike Aquinas, he argues that Natural Law’s purpose is to ensure a person is able to live a worthwhile life and to ‘flourish’ i.e. to establish what is really ‘good’ for humankind.
Finish natural law rejection of Aquinas primary precepts
Finnis instead argues that to flourish humans need seven basic, self-evident, universal goods, which apply equally to everyone at all times.
• Finnis believed the basic goods exist independent of human thought, and so we can put them in ‘reality’ in the same sense that maths lives in reality.
Basic goods reasonings can be proved
Belied that the basic goods are evident from practical reasoning and not theoretical reasoning.
We can distinguish between theoretical reasons which describes what is true with practical reasons which describes how to act.
Basic good reasonings cannot be proven
Practical reasonings cannot be proven such as assumptions that experience corresponds to reality or the preference for a simple explanation over a complex one (the principle of Ockham’s Razor).
• However, if you deny principles like the above you will find it impossible to pursue knowledge and you won’t be able to get anywhere at all. Moreover, you can just see that principles, like the above, are true by simply looking around.
Finnis argument on basic goods are the same
They are self-evident truths. Therefore, they cannot be derived from God’s law, or logic, or the inclinations of a human brain. They just obviously exist i.e. if you deny them, you cannot get anywhere, you cannot make decisions about what is best for your life.
• Finnis calls them ‘basic goods’ because they are self-evident basic needs of all human beings.
List of seven basic goods
Life
Knowledge
Play
Aesthetic experience
Sociability (friendship)
Practical reasonableness
Religion
Seven basic goods (life)
covers various aspects of life from bodily health to procreation- in 2011 he added marriage between male and female to his book.
Seven basic goods (knowledge)
Means been well informed
Seven basic goods (play)
Refers to recreation,enjoyment and fun
Seven basic goods (aesthetic experience)
An appreciation of beauty and art
Seven basic goods (friendship and sociability)
Acting in interest of one’s friends
Seven basic goods (practical reasonings)
Using ones intelligence to solve moral problems such as what to do,how to live shaping ones character
Like Aristotle’s practical wisdom
Seven basic goods (religion)
A connection with and participation with the order that transcends individual humanity I,e concerns for answering ultimate questions but not necessarily been involved in religious institutions