democracy + participation Flashcards
direct democracy
voters in direct democracies make their own political decisions and are directly involved in the process of political decision making. eg petitions, referendums, rallies, protests
pros of direct democracy
- enhanced political participation
- increased legitimacy
- transparency
- direct accountability
- encourages broad political debate
- reduces influence of special interests
cons of direct democracy
- risk of populism and emotional decisions
- low participation and voter fatigue
- complexity of issues
- tyranny of the majority
- difficulty in managing national issues
representative democracy
in a representative democracy, citizens vote for an individual to represent them in the making of laws and political decisions. eg members of parliament speak for a majority (question time, debate, laws)
pros of representative democracy
- expertise in decision making
- protection of minority rights
- accountability
- deliberation and debate
cons of representative democracy
- low participation levels
- inaccurate representation
- self interest
- delegates vs trustees
similarities of direct + representative democracy
- allow voters to make important decisions
- use mandates from the public to make decisions
differences of direct + representative democracy
- direct: voters make decisions on their own, uses mandates from public votes
- representative: representative makes decisions on behalf of others, each votes may be worth a different amount depending on the constituency size, votes for representatives are taken as a mandate
mandates
when a political party or decision maker has the authority to make decisions of put a policy into place. winning a seat in an election gives the member of parliament a mandate from their voters.
the case for democratic reform: democratic deficit
the belief that democracy is not working as intended and is failing to ensure appropriate accountability and legitimacy. in the uk, this refers to problems with representative democracy in practice.
examples of a democratic deficit
- low voter turnout
- the first past the post voting system
- institutions like the house of lords
- the eu
types of democratic reform
- electoral reform: moving away from the fptp system
- house of lords reform: stopping heriditary peers
- online voting
- compulsory voting
- lowering the voting age
the case against electoral reform
- importance of pressure groups: minority representation
- no demand for major reform
- media scrutiny
- election participation
suffrage
suffrage, of having the franchise is the right to engage in politics and vote in an election. ‘extending’ the franchise means increasing the number of people who can vote.
problems with the uk franchise
- in the early 1800s only 400k people could vote
- constituencies were boroughs or counties
- some wealthy individuals could vote multiple times, but others could not vote at all
- different boroughs had different rules on who could vote
- women + working class men were excluded