Democracy And Participation Flashcards
What the functions of democracy
Representation - People need to put their views across to the government.
Participation – must be a way to be engaged and involved in political process. Accountability-the government must explain their actions.
Power dispersal-power must be spread between different bodies of government. Legitimacy-branches of government should have legal authority and fairly represent the people.
Education-the political process is open to all to educate citizens to make informed decisions
Types of democracy
Liberal democracy - the right to vote is widespread and representatives act in the interests of everyone in society. An emphasis is to protect the rights of individuals.
Majoritarian democracy- the will and desires of the majority of population are the prime consideration of the government.
Pluralist -competition between groups who represent different concerns. Power is evenly distributed across society. The government is neutral and makes decisions based on argument.
Presidential democracy-the executive is elected separately from legislative and is chosen by and directly accountable to the people
Direct democracy -refers to any occasion where citizens are involved in the decision-making process.
Representative democracy-describes any system where people transfer the power to make decisions to an elected representative
Positive and negative aspects of democracy in the uk
Positive
free and fair elections, universal suffrage, the party system, pressure groups, Parliamentary sovereignty and devolution.
Negative
Un elected elements, turn out, West Lothian question, voting system, weakness of electoral system and lack of entrenched rights
Positive aspects of representative democracy
Everyone is represented by an MP
FPTP provides a clear winner
variety of parties
everyone over 18 can vote
pressure groups represents a variety of interests and people
new groups and parties are formed easily to deal with issues
the electoral commission makes elections fair
Negative aspects of representative democracy
FPTP means MPs mostly don’t win a majority
the electoral system leads to wasted votes and unproportional outcomes
safe seats lead to lack of meaningful choice the electoral commission cannot regulate all spending by parties
difference in size and wealth means competition in pressure groups is unfair
Arguments for direct democracy
Pure form of democracy
increases legitimacy in decisions improves participation and engagement
it works, Switzerland regularly uses this to make decisions
Arguments against direct democracy
Not practical to always do due to the amount of issues
Tyranny of the majority - minority groups have concerns overlooked
It undermines elected representatives
Low turnout makes elections illegitimate
People may vote on emotion and not what’s best
Facts on UK democracy
Safe seats: Liverpool, Walton labour won 86% of the vote with MP Dan Carden. However in Sheffield Hallam the Lib Dem safe seat since 2005 lost to MP Jared O’Mara in 2017.
2015 election 29% of the commons were women and 7% were from ethnic minorities
Turnout: 2001 59%, 2005 62%, 2010 65%, 2015 66% and 2017 69%.
Great reform act 1832
Led by middle class campaigners. This extended the vote to 300,000 people, based on property rather than land. However only 5.6% of the population could vote. Middle class created by the industrial revolution, they contributed more to the economy than the super rich so they got the vote
Representation of the people’s act 1918
Extended the franchise to all women over 30 and all men over 21.
Occurred as women were starting to work and pay tax and men were rewarded for fighting in the war
Representation of the people’s act 1928
Extended the franchise to everyone 21. Due to the NUSEC. They campaigned peacefully and succeeded to extend the franchise under Stanley Baldwin’s government
Representation of the people’s act 1969
Anyone over 18 could vote, due to the work of the Larry committee set up in 1965. Hey suggested everyone over 18 should have the vote as everyone over 18 were considered as adults
Suffragists and suffragettes
Suffragists - (NUWSS) set up by Millicent Fawcett in 1897. Non militant group, who had 100,000 members in 1914. They campaigned for women’s voting rights
Suffragettes - (WSPU) set up by Emily Pankhurst. Aims were to securing equal voting rights, female only membership, to be a group of actions not words and to focus on political equality. Violent actions were used
Chartists
Working class movement in 1836. Aims were to get the vote for every man over 21, MPs don’t have to own property, paid MPs, equal voting constituencies and elections each year for parliament
They had two groups
Moral force chartists led by William Lovett, they were a peaceful group
Physical force Chartists led by Feargus O’Connor, they were a violent group
Chartists failed due to lack of funding, different aims and lack of leadership
Extending the vote in the UK today
Prisoners - they don’t have the vote. In the 1990s John Hurst began a legal campaign to extend the franchise. The high court dismissed this in 2001 but in 2005 the European court on human rights declared this was a violation of human rights but the UK government ignored this.
16 year olds - votes at 16 is a campaign by a variety of groups. This is showing impact as 16 local councils, Scottish parliament, the welsh and Northern Irish assembly all support this campaign