democracy and participation Flashcards
2wwhat are voters like in direct democracies
make their own political decisions and are directly involved in the process of political decision making
- they vote themselves on policies and laws which are made by government
- decisions reached by a majority voting decision
e.g. some important decisions made by referendums
how are referendums an example of direct democracy
citizens directly vote on issues, government creates policy based on respone
e.g. uk eu referendum 2016, 33 million uk citizens voted- 51.89% voted leave
alternative vote referednum 2011, 19 million voted against alternative vote system - chose to keep fptp
how are online petitions an example of direct democracy
uk parliament setting up platform for citizens to make and sign online petitions
if petition gains over 100,000 signatures, then parliament may debate the topic (but this topic must be sponsored by the backbench business committee)- so arguably not entirely a direct democracy
example (1.6 million signing petition to stop us president donald trump from making a state visit to the uk- mps then debated trumps visit to parliament, changed it from a state visit to working visit in 2018)
how are rallies and protests an example of direct democracy
groups of people worried about government or political actions, (gather to demonstrate their support of disapproval)
- however government do not respond to these protests
examples-
2017, thousands of citizens protest in london aginst governments economic and political decisions (people disapproving of austerity measures)
2010, thousands of students in london marching to protest against tuiton fees
what are advantages of direct democracy
citizens become educated on key political issues (alternative vote referendum 2011 educated public on different kinds of voting ) - education
transparency- ensures a strong level of openess between citizens and the government
cooperation- people more likely to engage in political process if they believe their opinion will make a difference
argued to be purest type of democracy, - does not involve any interpretation
all votes are counted equally, (representative democracies- some constituencies are bigger than others- bigger constituencies each vote coutns for less)
in direct democracies, each vote counts the same amount towards important decisions
wishes of the people- direct democracy ensures the will of the people is clear, government is given clear directive to act
disadvantages of direct democracy
those voting may not be experts, public has to make important political decisions but voters may be less knowledgable and less able to make an informed decision than a representative politician
-it is impractical- direct democracy system is very time consuming, expensive, not practical to make frequent decisions
(for big countires with millions of citizens it is especially difficult) e.g. cabinet office: total cost of 2016 eu referendum was $142.4 million(including cost of running polling station and counting vote)
a direct democracy system can be manipulated: way that questions are phrased and timing of them can manipulate results
e.g.2016 eu referendum was changed from yes/no to remain/leave
(yes no quesitions many benefit the yes side )
electorate can be influenced by influential political figures, campaigns or media
-people may vote with emotion rather than considering all options available
representative democracy?
In a representative democracy, citizens vote for an individual to represent them in the making of laws and political decisions.
how does representation work in a representative democracy
elected representatives from organised parties make decisions on behalf of their voters
-regular elections give respresentatives authority and make system more legitimate
uk is a representative democracy, mps are elected to parliament by electorate in general election
mps in uk are accountable to citizens who have voted for them
political power in uk mainly held by representatives (not public)
role of members of parliament in a representative democracy
in general elections, voters vote for a candidate to represent local area called a constituency- there are 650 constituencies so 650 representatives voted for by citizens
winning candidate gains a seat in house of commons
(representatives act on behalf of constituency in parliament)
uk general elections in a representative democracy
elections take place every 5 years in may
(parliament can decide to hold an election earlier in a vote of no confidence in government or 2/3 voting in favour of a general election)
- most recent was december 2019, conservatives won 43.6% popular vote
role of question time in a representative democracy
mps question members of government on issues they are responsible for, often be on matters of concern to their constituents
prime minister’s question time, takes place once a week, leader of the opposition and mps question the prime minister on significiant issues (often on behalf of the voters they represent)
role of debate in a representative democracy
mps can propose and debate and debate themselves in parliament(on various issues which will have importance for the voters they represent )
role of laws in a representative democracy
way in which mps vote on laws in parliament can be based on representing views of constituents e.g. mp ken clarke , anna soubry voted in favour of giving parliament a vote on any brexit deal which is reached - represnting constituents and going against conservative party
advantages of a representative democracy
Representative democracy can mean that decisions are made with expertise, represent the voting public, are practical, and decision-makers are held accountable.
1- representation: representatives mean all in society are accounted for
-protected interests of minority groups
-they put together interests and demands of voters and making policy proposals that work best
(voters in direct democracies, lots of different demands and difficulties in those decisions)
2-expertise: representatives better informed to make political decisions, greater expertise and knwoledge than rest of population
(public educated on public policy and current political issues)
3-accountability=public and institutions can hold representatives accountable, in direct democracies it is harder to hold people as a whole accountable
4-practicality- citizens cannot always be expected to make decisions, election of representatives act on their behalf - more practical and beneficial
disadvantages of representative democracy
Representative democracy can have some disadvantages, such as the exclusion of minorities, the limited accountability of representatives and when representatives don’t act in the public’s interest.
1-delegates or trustees, act as delegates: express the view of those they represent
(or as trustees), have more freedom to choose actions they think will be best for constituents: if a trustee, but voters want them to be delegate- they may not accurately represent wish of voters
2- inaccurate representation, parliament may not have descriptive representation (same charatceristics as those they are representing) e.g. 29% of MPs are privately educated, only 7% of UK is.
may not have substantive representation, (represnetatives advocating on behalf of certain groups) e.g. david cameron push to legalise gay marriage in uk- not gay
_parliament needs both to properly represent
3-self interest, representatives choosing to act in their own best interest, or in best of a select few constituents rather than all
4-low participation levels: if few participate in elections, representatives not accurately reflecting those they represent in parliament
(turnoutn for eu parliament election- 35.6% in 2014 so more marginal and radical parties have seats)
(ukip won 26.6% of uk popular vote in european parliament but at 2-15 general election only won 12.6 % of vote)
trustees
act in best interest of constituents
delegates
express view of constituents
examples of representative democracy
1962 orpington by election
substantive
acting on behalf of certain groups
similarities between direct and representative democracies
both allowing voters to vote to make important decisions
use mandates from public to make decisions
differences between direct and representative democracies
each voter makes decisions on their own in direct democracies
representative- reprresentatives making decisions on behalf of voters
-each vote may be worth different due to different size of constituency
direct democracy uses mandates from public votes
representatives-votes for a representative is taken as a mandate or votes for several representatives
mandate
when political party or decision maker has authority to make decisions/ put out policy
winning a seat in election gives members of parliament a mandate from their voters
case for democratic reform
There have been some calls for democratic reform in the UK, as institutions may not represent the public to the best of their ability.
democratic defecit
democracy was not working as intended- failing to sufficiently hold people accountable , failing legitimacy
(problems with representative democracy in practice)
demorcratic defecit example case- low voter turnout
uk election turnout fell after 1997
(although rising again)
eleciton turnout low in elections other than general election, such as european parliament and location elections 35.6% in 2014 eu parliament election
democratic defecit- example case, the voting system
fptp creates two party system
parties without any large, country-wide base finds it hard to gain seats
-two main parties can win less than 40% of vote but still win majority
-fptp creates safe seats, one party is almost certain to win (opposition voters may feel their interests unrepresented)
-in votes with many candidates, popular vote may split candidate with low vote may win
(IN belfast 2015, winning candidate had 24.5% of vote)