Democracy and Participation Flashcards
Examples of direct democracy
referendums, public consultations, focus groups
Who are directly elected?
US President / Mayor
Advantages of Direct Democracy
- gives equal weight to all votes
- encourages popular participation in politics
- people take responsibility for own decisions
- reduces dependency on representatives
- develops sense of community
- encourages genuine debate
Disadvantages of Direct Democracy
- impractical in a large heavily populated modern state
- representatives are more trusted and have the expertise to make complex decisions
- more open to manipulation by others e.g. pressure groups and media
- minority viewpoints often disregarded
How does a representative democracy work?
voters elect representatives to make decisions on their behalf
in an election parties will put forwards policies and the voter makes a choice
if representatives do not satisfy voters they can be held to account and removed at the next election
Advantages of Representative Democracy
- most practical in a large modern state
- issues need rapid response
- in theory politicians are better informed than the average citizen
- reduces ‘ tyranny of the majority ‘
- representatives can be held account at elections
Disadvantages of Representative Democracy
- reduces active participation
- not always truly representative of wider public (often run by elites pursuing their own agendas
- minorities still remain underrepresented as politicians are more likely to follow views of the majority
- politicians skilfully avoid accountability (dead cat/ red meat)
- politicians may be corrupt and incompetent
Positive Aspects of UK Government
- devolved government (scotland, wales, NI, london are all allowed their own elected bodies to make local decisions
- independent judiciary (judges in court make decisions based on law not politics)
- free media (the media can report on anything it wants and can criticise the government freely (however, Gary Lineker 2023))
- free and fair elections
- wide range of political parties and pressure groups
Gary Lineker 2023
taken off air following a critical tweet on government’s asylum policy
compared rhetoric of governments to that used in Nazi Germany
Negative Aspects of UK Government
- FPTP underrepresents minority viewpoints
- Unelected House of Lords (lacks democratic legitimacy)
- Lack of protection for citizens rights
- Control of sections of the media by powerful business interests
Why is voter turnout decreasing?
- society has become more consumerist (people make their minds more on an individual basis)
- social media (enables young to exchange political views and participate in online campaigns without engaging in the real world)
- political apathy
- political hapathy
Political Apathy
lack of interest or awareness of contemporary events and political issues that affect society
Political Hapathy
people are generally contented and see no need to push for political change
Examples of well attended demonstrations
fuel prices, Iraq War, fox hunting and student tuition fees
Why was there a low turnout in 2001 and 2005?
booming economy and presumably levels of contentment were higher
Why was there a higher turnout in 2010 election?
less optimistic in terms of economy
time of austerity
What does political participation depend on?
the issue at stake
Turnout for Scottish Independence Referendum
84.6%
Turnout for 2016 EU Referendum
72.2%
How many constituencies did there used to be?
two
country (mainly rural areas)
boroughs (towns)
Who was voting restricted to?
freehold property owners
What issue did 1832 Great Reform Act address?
the issue of ‘rotten boroughs’
redistributed the constituency seats more line with population
Who did the 1832 Great Reform Act grant the right to vote to?
smaller property holders and tenant farmers in the counties
What percentage of population were entitled to vote after 1832 Great Reform Act?
5%
1918 Representation of People Act
all men over 21 and women over 30
1928 Representation of People Act
terms for men and women to vote equalised
full adult suffrage (both can vote at 21)
What year was full adult suffrage achieved?
1928
1969 Representation of People Act
voting age reduced to 18
Difference between suffragist and suffragette?
suffragist - someone who peacefully campaigns for women’s right to vote
suffragette - someone who used violent means to campaign for women’s right to vote
When did suffragette movement start?
1866
John Stuart Mill proposed an amendment that would allow men and women equal voting terms but was rejected 194 votes to 73
NUWSS
1897
suffragists
gradualist strategy
non violent tactics
WSPU
1903
Pankhurst
‘Deeds Not Words’
wanted to heighten the profile of the suffrage movement in the media and parliament, e.g. law breaking, violence, hunger strikes
How did WW1 have an effect on suffrage movement?
Many women were employed in key industries to the war effort e.g. factories and weapon manufacturers
Women’s experiences in the war raised their self image and sense of individual identity
What are the recent debates on extending the franchise?
16 year olds
prisoners
foreign nationals with indefinite leave to remain in britain
people with UK passports living abroad
Extending Franchise to 16 Year Olds
Temporarily received right to vote in Scottish Independence Referendum in 2014
Credited with the much higher turnout in that vote
Arguments FOR extending franchise to 16 year olds
- youth interests are currently neglected by politicians who know they don’t need the votes of those under 16
- would strengthen political interest and engagement amongst young people
- 16 year olds can already join the army, have sex, get marriage and leave home etc
- high turnout of 2014 Scottish Independence Referendum
Arguments AGAINST extending franchise to 16 year olds
- Most still live with parents, in education rather than full time employment
- Most have an incomplete understanding of and lack of interest in politics
- Childhood and adolescence should be a time of personal development and enjoyment not of weighty political responsibility
- Young people are not permanently denied representation (unlike women in the past)
- Turnout may decrease as 16-17 year olds may be less likely to vote therefore undermining legitimacy of elected governments
Arguments FOR Compulsory Voting
- gives greater democratic legitimacy to the elected government
- enforces greater participation in democratic process
- would solve participation crisis
- encourages voters to become better informed about political issues
- reduces tyranny of the majority
Arguments AGAINST Compulsory Voting
- violation of civil liberties as it would be an abuse of freedom
- does not guarantee a better engaged or more informed electorate
- significant extra administrative costs
- may increase the number of ill thought out and wasted votes