DELICT Flashcards
Dorset Yacht v The Home Office [1970] AC 1004
…
Damnum injuria datum
Loss wrongfully caused
Damnum absque injuria
loss without wrong
Solatium
award for pain and suffering
Patrimonial loss
tangible economic losses - medical expenses, loss of earnings
culpa tenet suos auctores
fault adheres to its author
Stewart v Adams 1920 SC 120
boat owner hire a joiner to do some repairs on boat, - boat on filed. ‘ the pursuer’s cow was poisoned by the scrapings while grazing. The boat owner was held liable, as he had failed in his duty to ensure that the poisonous scrapings were removed, it being recognised that such duty could not be delegated to the contractor.
Muir v Glasgow Corp 1943 SC (HL) 46
delegation of responsibility safely to carry an urn full of hot water past of group of children into a narrow corridor was held sufficient to discharge the duty of care owed by the manageress to the children.
Woodland v Essex CC [2014] AC 537
Young girl, swimming lesson, brain damage when she got into difficulties during swimming lesson. The Supreme Court overturned the decision of Court of Appeal and found that the education authority owed a non-delegable duty to schoolchildren with regard to the functions it was entrusted to perform. Lord Sumption - 5 criteria that would, outside of statutory duty, higway and hazard cases, give rise to a non-delegable duty of care.
Dorset Yacht v Home Office [1970] AC 1004
‘Prison officers were held to owe a duty of care to the owners of property situated beside a campsite where the officers were employed to supervise young offenders on a camping trip.’
Delict
law of obliogations, contract arises from agreement whereas delict arise ex lege, involuntary obligation; a civil wring created by (a) the deliberate or negligent breach of a legal duty; or (b) a wrongful act against another person
Sources of Delict
Roman Law - aquilian liability Institutional writing case law statute nominate delicts
causation is important to establish the link between wrong and loss
.
Negligence could be presumed res ipsa loquitur
from the thing itself
Ansell v Waterhouse 1817 M&S 385
English law was willing to accept liability in cases where an act or omission was ‘contrary to the duty that the law costs’