Delegated Legislation Flashcards
Delegated Legislation
Primary source of law in this country
Purely practical bc Parliament have limited time, so detailed rules are drawn up by another body who may be experienced in that issue.
3 reasons why DL is needed
- An emergency
- New law for specific area
- New law on a technical matter; eg health
ENABLING ACT
- Parliament gives authority for others to make laws, provides a broad framework as to what they want the new law to be about, others fill in details.
Types of DL
1) Statutory instruments or regulations
2) Orders in council
3) Bylaws of local authorities
3a) Bylaws of other authorities
Statutory Instruments or regulations
- Rules or regulations for area of government the government ministers are responsible for
1) Minister for Transport deals with road traffic regulations RTA
2) Education act amended by Education Minister
Orders in council
- Drafted by government and given formal approval by King and PRIVY COUNCIL usually in time of national emergency when Parliament isn’t sitting
- enabling act that give King & Privy council authority to make laws is EMERGENCY POWERS ACT 1920 & CIVIL CONTINGENCIES ACT 2004
EXAMPLES
1) Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 to make weed a class C
2) Transferring responsibilities between government departments
3) Made funding terrorist illegal after 9/11 - UN ACT
Bylaws of local authorities
- LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT 1972
Dog fouling illegal - CLEAN NEIGHBOURHOOD & ENVIRONMENT ACT 2005.
Bylaws of other authorities
Public bodies and some companies can make laws within their area which affect the public.
- RAILWAY ACT 1933; Railway companies issue by-plans of behaviour of public on their trains.
Controls of Delegated Legislation
1) Control by Parliament (Statutory Instruments)
2) Control by the Court (UV RULE)
Control by Parliament
- 3 Statutory instruments
Power to make DL must be governed by an EA passed by P so P is in broad control, also maintain control through PARLIAMENTARY SOVEREIGNTY which means they can at any time revoke a piece of DL or pass legislation on the same subject as DL which would contradict it.
Parliament can write any of the following into the enabling act as a method of control:
1) AFFIRMATIVE RESOLUTION PROCEDURE
2) NEG RESOLUTION PROCEDURE
3) SCRUTINY COMMITEE
AFFIRMATIVE RESOLUTION PROCEDURE
AFFIRMATIVE RESOLUTION PROCEDURE
- SI not law until parliament vote & say YES; 28-40 days
(Parliament can only approve or withdraw, CANT ALTER)
NEGATIVE RESOLUTION PROCEDURE
NEGATIVE RESOLUTION PROCEDURE
- Many SI’s subject to this so DL will become law unless rejected by P within 40 days
(No requirement for MPs to look at legislation, so only a few are seen)
SCRUTINY COMMITTEE
SCRUTINY COMMITTEE
- Members of both houses, review all SIs and refer them back to P if they:
> Go beyond power given to them in EA
> Not been made according to method stipulated in EA
> Unclear
(Can’t alter a statutory instrument)
Control By the Court (KBD)
To question DL in court you must personally be affected by DL and must take action within 3 months of it becoming law.
DL can be challenged by the court and were necessary declared ULTRA VIRES (beyond the power)
Any DL declared ULTRA VIRES is VOID & INEFFECTIVE
3 approaches to the UV rule as regards DL:
1) SUBSTANTIVE ULTRA VIRES
- Minister has exceeded power given to him - R V HOMES SECRETARY
2) PROCEDURAL ULTRA VIRES
- Minister has failed to follow some procedure specified - AYLESBURY MUSHROOMS
3) UNREASONABLE REGULATIONS
- established in WEDNESBURY CORRUPTIONS CASE commonly known as ‘wednesbury unreasonableness’
Effectiveness / Problems of Judicial Controls
> Publication is limited so people don’t know about the DL
> Individuals may not realise they can challenge the DL
> Judicial review process is expensive
> The DL has got to affect individual before they can challenge it in court, and the challenge has to be within 3 months of the publication of DL
> Even when faced with opportunity to review DL, judges can only declare it void not amend it