Deindivduation Flashcards

1
Q

What is de-individuation?

A

The loss of self-awareness, identity and of individual accountability when part of a relatively anonymous group, consequently leading to aggressive behavior.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does Gustav Le Bon say?

A
  • An individual is transformed when apart of a crowd
  • The anonymity, suggestibility and contagion mean that a ‘collective mind’ takes possession of the individual
  • As a consequence the individual loses self control and acts in a way that goes against personal social norms.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What happens when the individual disregards societal norms?

A

internal inhibitions are weakened

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What emotions does the individual lack?

A

guilt, fear and shame

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How do people in a crowd act?

A

impulsive, irrational, emotional and antisocial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Where is attention focused when in a state of de-individuation?

A

attention focused outward

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Describe the Halloween study by Diener et al (1976)

A
  • confederate presented bowl of candy to trick or treaters
  • IV were if kids came in group or alone and if they were forced to make the identity visible
  • When came to door, confederate leaves momentarily and tell kids to take 1 piece of candy
  • another experimenter observed how many children took more than one piece of candy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does Zimbardo’s research on de-individuation suggest?

A

That anonymity (key component of de-individuation) increases aggression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Describe Zimbardo’s study (procedure)

A
  • 4 female undergraduates
  • required to deliver electric shocks to another student to aid learning
  • Half ppts wore bulky lab coats and hoods hid their faces
  • Sat in separate cubicles
  • Other ppts given large name tags + introduced to each other by names
  • Also able to see each other when seated at shock seat
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What were the findings of Zimbardo’s study?

A
  • ppts in de-individuation condition were more likely to press a button that they believed would give shock to a ‘victim’ in another room
  • They held the shock button for twice as long as did the identifiable ppts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What factors increase the feeling of anonymity?

A
  • altered state (alcohol/drugs)
  • uniform
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What does anonymity diminish?

A

diminishes own awareness of own individuality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

As own individuality is diminished, how does the individual feel?

A

unaccountable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

When we are easily identifiable what happens?

A
  • own knowledge of societal norms prevent uncivilised behaviour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

A03 Explain research in support of gender differences in de-individuation

A
  • Cannavale et al found that male and females respond different under de-individuation conditions
  • Increased aggression in all-male group
  • Not in all-female groups
  • Was also found by Diener et al who found greater disinhibition of aggression (i.e. removal of the normal inhibition that prevents aggression) in de-individualised males than de-in females
  • One possible reason for these gender differences is that males tend to respond to provocation in more extreme ways than females and these tendencies are magnified under de-individuation conditions (Eagly 2013)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

A03 How has research into de-individuation been applied to the real world?

A
  • Mann used de-individuation to explain bizarre aspect of collective behaviour - the ‘baiting crowd’ and suicide jumpers.
  • Mann analysed 21 suicide leaps reported in newspapers (USA) in the 1960’s 1970’s.
  • 10 out of 21 where crowd watched, baiting occurred
  • These incidents occurred at night, large crowd and some distance from the jumper
  • (particularly when the jumper was above them)
  • All these states produce de-ind
  • power of baiting crowd also evident in analysis of 60 lynchings in US between 1899-1946 (Mullen)
  • More people = more savagery
  • Two studies lend support to notion of anonymous crowd as a de-ind ‘mob’
17
Q

A03 Is de-individuation a universal behaviour?

A
  • Dramatic support for the deadly influence of de-ind comes from study by anthropologist Robert Waston.
  • Collected data on which warriors in 23 societies changed their appearance prior going to war
  • and the extent to which they killed, tutored or mutilated their victims
  • societies where warriors changed their appearance (paint, costumes) were more destructive compared to those who didnt
  • Result of this study reveal significant relationship between de-ind and aggressive behaviour in warfare