Definitions / discussion Flashcards
SEXUAL VIOLATION s128 Crimes Act 1961
(1) Sexual violation is the act of a person who—
(a) rapes another person; or
(b) has unlawful sexual connection with another person.
RAPE s128(2) Crimes Act 1961
Person A rapes person B if person A has sexual connection with person B, effected by the penetration of person B’s genitalia by person A’s penis,—
(a) without person B's consent to the connection; and (b) without believing on reasonable grounds that person B consents to the connection.
PENETRATION s2(1A), Crimes Act 1961
Introduction and penetration have the same meaning,
Introduction to the slightest degree is enough to effect a connection.
PENETRATION
Proof of penetration is required although the slightest degree of penetration is sufficient. Proof may be provided by a medical examination, the complainant’s testimony or the accused admissions
GENETALIA
The genitalia or genitals (literally: organs of generation) include the penis and testicles of a male, and the vagina and vulva of a female
GENETALIA s2 Crimes Act 1961
Genitalia includes a surgically constructed or reconstructed organ analogous to naturally occurring male or female genitalia (whether the person concerned is male, female, or of indeterminate sex)
PENIS
The male organ of reproduction
PENIS s2 Crimes Act 1961
Penis includes a surgically constructed or reconstructed organ analogous to a naturally occurring penis (whether the person concerned is male, female or of indeterminate sex).
MATTERS NOT CONSTITUTING CONSENT s128A Crimes Act 1961
- not protesting or offering physical resistance to use of force, threats of force to self or others, or fear of force to self or others
- asleep or unconscious
- so affected by drugs/alcohol they cannot consent
- so affected by mental or physical impairment they cannot consent
- mistaken ID
- mistaken as to nature and quality of the act
REASONABLE GROUNDS
The establishing of Reasonable grounds is a three step process
Subjective Test (1) Whether or not the complainant was consenting is a subjective test from the complainant’s point of view - ie, what was the complainant thinking at the time? Is she consenting?
Subjective Test (2) The second subjective Test is if she wasn’t consenting did the offender believe she was consenting – what was the offender thinking at the time? Did he believe she was consenting?
Objective Test -
If the offender believed the complainant was consenting, the third step is an objective test as to what a reasonable person placed in the same position as the defendant would have believed?
BELIEF R v GUTUAMA
Under the objective test the Crown must prove that “no reasonable person in the accused’s shoes could have thought that [the complainant] was consenting.”
AGE Q v FORREST and FORREST
The best evidence possible in the circumstances should be adduced by the prosecution in proof of [the victim’s] age”.
UNLAWFUL SEXUAL CONNECTION s2 Crimes Act 1961
Person A has unlawful sexual connection with Person B if Person A has sexual connection with Person B -
• without person B’s consent to the connection,
and
• without believing on reasonable grounds that person B consents to the connection
SEXUAL CONNECTION s128(3) Crimes Act 1961
(a) connection effected by the introduction into the genitalia or anus of one person, otherwise than for genuine medical purposes, of—
(i) a part of the body of another person; or
(ii) an object held or manipulated by another person; or
(b) connection between the mouth or tongue of one person and a part of another person’s genitalia or anus; or
(c) the continuation of connection of a kind described in paragraph (a) or paragraph (b)
INTRODUCTION
Introduction and penetration have the same meaning